Nadal will be new year end #1

sureshs

Bionic Poster
http://sports.yahoo.com/ten/news;_y...DmWcgv7YF?slug=ap-atpfinals&prov=ap&type=lgns

Nadal: In ‘perfect shape’ going into ATP finals
By MATTIAS KAREN, AP Sports Writer
2 hours, 12 minutes ago

Buzz up! 0 PrintLONDON (AP)—All the involuntary rest because of injuries gives Rafael Nadal a good feeling heading into the season-ending ATP World Tour Finals.

When most players are nursing weary bodies after a long season, Nadal says things couldn’t be better.

“I’m in perfect shape, both mentally and physically,” Nadal said Friday. “I’ve had the best end of the season in my life.”

However, freshness comes at a steep cost. Knee tendinitis prevented him from defending his Wimbledon title and an abdominal injury forced another layoff after the U.S. Open.
Now the second-ranked Spaniard says he has returned to top form after reaching the Shanghai Masters final last month and the Paris Masters semifinals last week.

“I am close to my absolute best. I am playing well,” Nadal said. “And this situation, getting to play against the best players in the world, is perfect for me.”

The ATP World Tour Finals, the latest incarnation of the nearly 40-year-old elite season-ending tournament, features eight of the top players in the world, with a round-robin before the semifinals and final.

Nadal’s first match will be against rival Robin Soderling on Monday, giving him a chance to avenge his surprising fourth-round loss at the French Open against the Swede. Soderling qualified for the event as an alternate after Andy Roddick pulled out with a left knee injury.

Nadal said he’s more worried about Novak Djokovic in his group than Soderling or even top-ranked Roger Federer. He insists the third-ranked Serb is playing the best tennis of his life.

Djokovic defeated Nadal in the Paris semifinals en route to his second straight title, after beating Federer in the Swiss Indoors final the previous week.

“If I play my best tennis, and he plays like he did (in Paris), it’s going to be almost impossible” to beat him, Nadal said.

Djokovic, the defending champion at Shanghai last year, said he’s got a lot more to play for than just the rich prize. An undefeated champion will take home $1.63 million, with $120,000 knocked off for each loss in the round robin.

“I rate the world tour finals, besides grand slams, as the biggest event in our sport,” Djokovic said. “So being a title defender is a big responsibility.”

Djokovic plays Nikolay Davydenko in the first round, while Federer’s group includes U.S. Open champion Juan Martin del Potro, Andy Murray and Fernando Verdasco.

Federer, who lost to Julien Benneteau of France in the second round in Paris last week, will play Verdasco on Sunday in his first match in London’s O2 Arena. Federer said he can’t take any match for granted.

“At the very last tournament of the season, we could be sent home packing with three defeats,” Federer said. “But we can also go home having the best feeling in the world after beating all your closest rivals you’ve had through the year.”

Federer will be protecting his No. 1 ranking. Nadal has a slim chance of taking the top spot if he wins the event and the Swiss star has a poor performance.

“I’m aware of it. I’d be lying if I say I’m just here to play well,” Federer said. “Definitely, I’m here to win the tournament and try to stay No. 1 in the world.”

Nadal tried to downplay his chances of returning to the top of the rankings.

“If I win the tournament, it doesn’t matter to me if I’m No. 10,” he said. “The rest of the things, No. 1, No. 3, it doesn’t matter.”

AP Sports Writer Chris Lehourites contributed to this report.
 

joeri888

G.O.A.T.
So? What does this article proof? Nadal claims to be close to his best, so does Federer, yet both had bad results last week. I think neither will win it, ergo Federer will finish the year as no. 1
 

OddJack

G.O.A.T.
Nadal is nowhere close to his best. If tony is wise, he should be preparing him for FO. Play less matches, stay injury free.
 

Talker

Hall of Fame
Nadal is nowhere close to his best. If tony is wise, he should be preparing him for FO. Play less matches, stay injury free.


Same way I see it. There will be no time to "play into shape", it's going to be tough from the first match.

The only one going in looking good is Nole, but even he may be worn down from previous weeks.
 
I don't understand that. Rafa has zero points to defend, and Djokovic all points there are to geT?

The points from 2008 TMC have already been removed. So the points from the upcoming WTF will just be added to what they have now. Djokovic has a chance to overtake Nadal, and Nadal has a chance to overtake Fed, but they are both very, very slim.
 

RelentlessAttack

Hall of Fame
lmfao, they've all been talking so confidently, are they admitting to tanking in recent tournaments where they put up lackluster performances?
 
umm... doesn't look like he is that confident

welcome to Nadal's signature self-effacing PR remarks. Remember all the post match interviews after having beaten Federer betw. '05 and '07? You gotta give his PR team props.

"I'm playing da greatest in de history, no?"

Yes, Djokovic thrashed Nadal in Paris, but Nadal expects to win every match he plays on every surface, which is what makes him so beasty.
 

CMM

Legend
welcome to Nadal's signature self-effacing PR remarks. Remember all the post match interviews after having beaten Federer betw. '05 and '07? You gotta give his PR team props.

"I'm playing da greatest in de history, no?"

Yes, Djokovic thrashed Nadal in Paris, but Nadal expects to win every match he plays on every surface, which is what makes him so beasty.
He's too good to be true, no?:)
But I think he is. Admitting that Fed is the GOAT has nothing to do with him wanting to win. I saw a video of a 12 years old Nadal who lost a final at a small tournament and he was as modest and humble as he is now. Do you think that he had a PR team then?:shock:
 

dr325i

G.O.A.T.
I don't understand that. Rafa has zero points to defend, and Djokovic all points there are to geT?

The points are already deducted.

1 Federer, Roger (SUI) 10,150
2 Nadal, Rafael (ESP) 9,205
3 Djokovic, Novak (SRB) 7,910
4 Murray, Andy (GBR) 6,630 (6,830 after today's match)

So if Djokovic were to repeat last year's success and Nadal lose all three matches in the group, or even win only one (which is possible), Novak would be a new #2.

Similarly, if RF were to screw up (unlikely) and Nadal were to win the whole thing (unlikely), Rafa would be a new #1.

Finally, if Novak loses two out of three group stage matches and Murray takes it all, Murray would reclaim the #3 position...
 

clayman2000

Hall of Fame
The points are already deducted.

1 Federer, Roger (SUI) 10,150
2 Nadal, Rafael (ESP) 9,205
3 Djokovic, Novak (SRB) 7,910
4 Murray, Andy (GBR) 6,630 (6,830 after today's match)

So if Djokovic were to repeat last year's success and Nadal lose all three matches in the group, or even win only one (which is possible), Novak would be a new #2.

Similarly, if RF were to screw up (unlikely) and Nadal were to win the whole thing (unlikely), Rafa would be a new #1.

Finally, if Novak loses two out of three group stage matches and Murray takes it all, Murray would reclaim the #3 position...

Would Del Po take no 4 if he wins the title, and Murray looses his next 2 matches? :):):)
 

Lsmkenpo

Hall of Fame
Federer is now guaranteed to end year as 1. He had to lose all his matches and Rafa needed to win all of his to overtake him.

Congrats!! Roger is #1
 

Rhino

Legend
Federer is now guaranteed to end year as 1. He had to lose all his matches and Rafa needed to win all of his to overtake him.

Congrats!! Roger is #1

Not quite yet. These are the two remaining scenarios for Nadal...

1. If Nadal is an undefeated champion at the Barclays ATP World Tour Finals (winning all-three round-robin matches, a semi-final and final) he will earn the maximum 1,500 points. If that happens, Federer would need to either win all three round-robin matches OR reach the final to beat out Nadal for the 2009 ATP World Tour Champion title.

2. If Nadal goes 2-1 in round-robin play and wins the title he will earn 1,300 points. If that happens, Federer would need to either win two round-robin matches OR win one round-robin match and reach the final to beat out Nadal for the 2009 ATP World Tour Champion title.
 

Blinkism

Legend
25 for each?

And they play against Czech Republic on clay?

It's not 25 for each, but it's complicated- it ends up being 50 points added to Nadal's tally if he wins 2 singles matches (winning 1 would give him no extra points).

Yeah, they play Czech Republic (Stepanek/Berdych) on clay. Nadal's DC singles counterpart would be Ferrer, I believe.
 

joeri888

G.O.A.T.
It's not 25 for each, but it's complicated- it ends up being 50 points added to Nadal's tally if he wins 2 singles matches (winning 1 would give him no extra points).

Yeah, they play Czech Republic (Stepanek/Berdych) on clay. Nadal's DC singles counterpart would be Ferrer, I believe.

If he can't beat Berdych and Stepanek on his favourite surface if that can give him the year end no. 1 ranking, he's gone completely. I don't believe that. So the gap between Rog and Raf practically is 895 points. Would be tough to swallow if you lose it by 5 points.
 

Carsomyr

Legend
It's not 25 for each, but it's complicated- it ends up being 50 points added to Nadal's tally if he wins 2 singles matches (winning 1 would give him no extra points).

Yeah, they play Czech Republic (Stepanek/Berdych) on clay. Nadal's DC singles counterpart would be Ferrer, I believe.

If Nadal was truly gunning for it; for instance, if indeed it came down to the DC final, Nadal would indeed have to win two singles matches.

However, let's be real; this is Czech Republic vs. Spain on clay. The Spaniards should have no problem wrapping up this tie 3-0. Would Nadal be scheduled to play the dead rubbers?
 

Blinkism

Legend
If Nadal was truly gunning for it; for instance, if indeed it came down to the DC final, Nadal would indeed have to win two singles matches.

However, let's be real; this is Czech Republic vs. Spain on clay. The Spaniards should have no problem wrapping up this tie 3-0. Would Nadal be scheduled to play the dead rubbers?

Yeah, but David Ferrer is going to lose. The dude hasn't played since Montreal.

Also, the Czechs have a much more superior doubles team.
 

joeri888

G.O.A.T.
If Nadal was truly gunning for it; for instance, if indeed it came down to the DC final, Nadal would indeed have to win two singles matches.

However, let's be real; this is Czech Republic vs. Spain on clay. The Spaniards should have no problem wrapping up this tie 3-0. Would Nadal be scheduled to play the dead rubbers?
Yes, if that gives him the year end ranking, yes. Therefore the relevant gap is 895 points in my eyes.
 

Carsomyr

Legend
Yeah, but David Ferrer is going to lose. The dude hasn't played since Montreal.

Also, the Czechs have a much more superior doubles team.

Hmm, I see you shifted the tone in your post. I think it would be terrible sportsmanship for the Spaniards to tank a match so Nadal can end the year as #1. Like you said, The Czechs have a good doubles team, with Stepanek likely being the best doubles player on either team. If they threw Ferrer's match, and ended up losing the doubles, there's no guarantee they would win the rubber that Nadal didn't play. To lose the Davis Cup to be the superficial #1?
 

Blinkism

Legend
Hmm, I see you shifted the tone in your post. I think it would be terrible sportsmanship for the Spaniards to tank a match so Nadal can end the year as #1. Like you said, The Czechs have a good doubles team, with Stepanek likely being the best doubles player on either team. If they threw Ferrer's match, and ended up losing the doubles, there's no guarantee they would win the rubber that Nadal didn't play. To lose the Davis Cup to be the superficial #1?

I'm just sayin', David Ferrer was an odd choice when Robredo, Verdasco, and Ferrero would be better choices. Ferrer is really rusty, not having played in a while.

Also, the Czech's have the 2009 French Open (and US Open) Doubles Champion on their side, Lukas Dlouhy.

It's likely that Nadal will get 2 matches in at the Davis Cup.
 

Carsomyr

Legend
I'm just sayin', David Ferrer was an odd choice when Robredo, Verdasco, and Ferrero would be better choices. Ferrer is really rusty, not having played in a while.

I suppose, although Ferrer has played in like six tournaments since Montreal, including Valencia a couple of weeks ago. Hasn't played well, mind you, but he was there. :razz:
 

Blinkism

Legend
I suppose, although Ferrer has played in like six tournaments since Montreal, including Valencia a couple of weeks ago. Hasn't played well, mind you, but he was there. :razz:

Has he really?

Dude's been a complete ghost, then. He's fallen off the map since the clay season.
 

edmondsm

Legend
This is a terrible fail thread. The title of the thread is Nadal will be new year end #1 and then sureshs highlighted in his OP Nadal has a slim chance of taking the top spot if he wins the event and the Swiss star has a poor performance.

What is it? He will be #1 or has a slim chance?

Anyway, Nadal is officially #2. Again. He's the greatest #2 ever, aside from the one I took this morning. It was epic.

End thread.
 

bruce38

Banned
Nadal is simply not a #1 'type' player. He's limited as I have said all along, and that is showing now. Playing at 100% and the best shape he's ever been in (as he himself says) he is losing to guys like Soderling. It's not bad, this is simply where Nadal's skill belongs. It's an illusion that he was ever in the league of a Federer or even Sampras for that matter. In his best year ever when he was playing lights out (at the same time Fed was not up to par/aging), he won 2 slams. Fed beginning on the decline won 3 slams in 07. This is the difference.
 
Top