nadalwon2012
Banned
i agree...
Vamos
![]()
You aren't allowed to make up quotes. Hope you get banned.
i agree...
Vamos
![]()
Still, he has never beaten Nadal in a clay slam. And slams are what greatness is really measured by. Nadal won his first 5 slam meetings with Djokovic, and that included Roland Garros, Wimbledon and US Open. That's 3 slam surfaces.
You aren't allowed to make up quotes. Hope you get banned.
1. No obscene or profane language is allowed.
2. No personal attacks or abusive language is allowed. If you have a problem with someone, take it off Talk Tennis. Antagonistic behavior will not be tolerated. Debating issues and opinions is fine, but flaming and insulting won’t be tolerated.
3. No questioning, flaming, or trolling of moderation/admin on the boards will be tolerated. Posts concerning moderation will be deleted. Persistence can be cause for banning. If you have a legit concern about moderation, email discussadmin@tennis-warehouse.com
4. No promotion or advertising of Tennis Warehouse competitors allowed. This is our message board and we pay to maintain it. If you want to discuss a competitor, please be respectful of our request and do this privately, not on Talk Tennis.
5. No Sales of New Products are allowed. The For Sale/Trade forum is provided for sales of used, personal tennis equipment. No dealers or anyone in the business of selling racquets. This applies to the Classifieds section. Tennis Warehouse is in business to sell tennis equipment. Please feel free to sell used personal gear only. Any posts advertising new products will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be banned from Talk Tennis. Also, no links to E-Bay auctions are allowed. For sale posts and messages are permitted in the For Sale forum only. Posts in other forums will be removed and may result in the user being banned. No for sale posting or commercial links in signatures or user profiles.
6. No pornography. If you choose to include attached images, that’s fine. Just keep it clean and avoid any that could be interpreted as porn – soft or hard. This includes avatar images. There’s a wide range of ages that post on Talk Tennis and we want material posted to be acceptable to all. Tennis Warehouse reserves the right to remove any images we determine may be offensive.
7. No advertising or promotion of any products, services or otherwise (whether or not for profit), or solicit others or use any forum for commercial purposes of any kind. No posting of torrents or downloads of copyrighted material.
8. No spamming the forums with off topic posts. Spamming the forums will result in an immediate ban.
9. No trademarked or copyrighted usernames allowed.
10. We allow one username per user. If we find you have more than one username, you will be banned.
Do you think Djokovic can beat Nadal at RG?
would you be so kind as to mention what rule was broken?
on the other hand, you are clearly breaking the rule number 10, AGAIN...
Rule number 10? "We allow one username per user. If we find you have more than one username, you will be banned." Wrong.
There is no way you can intentionally misquote others. You won't get away with it if you keep doing it. Do it 10 more times in your next 15 posts. You won't last.
Federer, Djokovic, Roddick, anyone can beat Nadal at Roland Garros. Anything is possible.
Rule number 10? "We allow one username per user. If we find you have more than one username, you will be banned." Wrong.
There is no way you can intentionally misquote others. You won't get away with it if you keep doing it. Do it 10 more times in your next 15 posts. You won't last.
So if ANYONE can beat Nadal at RG (which is extremely far-fetched since only one person has done it), why are you making such a big deal about Djokovic having not done it? Doesn't it seem rather pointless to point out something you yourself admit might not even be the case in a few months time?
NO rule was broken in my post, which was obviously in a jest. unfortunately you seem to have left your inteligence near your sense of humour - that would be in the trash - to understand.
other than that, i do as i please. dont like my style, you can put me on your ignore list.
What if verdasco wins next 3 slams and WTF? Will he surpass nadal in achievements? Discuss
If Verdasco wins the next 3 slams, then he will warrant a hypothetical regarding whether he will do it again.
What can I say, I only recognize 'humor' when its funny. I didn't realize you were supposed to be funny. Your post looked like it meant to be disrespectful/annoying. You accomplished that. Ignore lists are for chickens. No thanks. You keep messing with me, I'll mess with you back.
What can I say, I only recognize 'humor' when its funny. I didn't realize you were supposed to be funny. Your post looked like it meant to be disrespectful/annoying. You accomplished that. Ignore lists are for chickens. No thanks. You keep messing with me, I'll mess with you back.
You only recognize humor when it hits you in the face?
If Nadal accomplishes this AGAIN, that would surely represent the most incredible feat in history
It would be more impressive than 16 slams.
The only question is whether it would be more impressive than Laver's double-calendar year grand slam
Either way, another triple-surface-triple would put Nadal ahead of Federer in history.
What if verdasco wins next 3 slams and WTF? Will he surpass nadal in achievements? Discuss
Can't be any worse than the it is "possible" Federer to be seeded #1 at FO 2012 or become #1 before FO or become #1 in 2012.
I would say that at least he is par for the course![]()
Mr Zilla is obviously very passionate about Nadal, and wants to share that passion with everyone else. You guys are just being mean.
But if the rumors are true, and he is actually a Fed fan, man that is even bigger than the twist in The Usual Suspects.
Do you think Djokovic can beat Nadal at RG?
I don't know who Mr Zilla or Clarky or whoever support, but if I was a Federer fan I would kill myself. There would be no greater shame than supporting that pr1ck.
A hypothetical question like this is stupid anyway. There's no point in even discussing it, because it won't happen. Questioning this is like saying that Pablo andujar will win every grand slam from now till 2020. It won't happen, so it isn't discussed.
Its only a hypothetical, but it scares you, because its only one player away from happening. Nadal only has one player to overcome, and he has the next 3+ slams.
Only one player to overcome? Really? Murray has beaten Nadal in a slam several times (as has Del Potro) and I find it hard to believe that if he got to the Wimbledon or US Open Final against Federer, that we would win one or both. Nadal had to play the match of his life to beat Federer at Wimbledon in 08, and he still had to go 9-7 in the 5th to beat him.
So I think it's ludicrous to say Nadal has only one player to overcome.
Its only a hypothetical, but it scares you, because its only one player away from happening. Nadal only has one player to overcome, and he has the next 3+ slams. It also means I own like 500 posters. Heck, if Nadal wins Roland Garros I own about 100 posters.
Only one player to overcome? Really? Murray has beaten Nadal in a slam several times (as has Del Potro) and I find it hard to believe that if he got to the Wimbledon or US Open Final against Federer, that we would win one or both. Nadal had to play the match of his life to beat Federer at Wimbledon in 08, and he still had to go 9-7 in the 5th to beat him.So I think it's ludicrous to say Nadal has only one player to overcome.
Yep from next slam until 2022. I would have said until 2027 but that would sound a bit unrealistic and I don't want to lose credibility
You own 500 more accounts? Wow! You covered every possible scenario to switch to a new self if (big IF) things go wrong.
To be fair Nadal crapped the bed when he was up 2 sets to love,and blew the breaker with some silly misses. That match never should have even gone to 5 sets.
I think its safe to say 500 posters give Nadal no chance of winning the next 3 slams. I would own all of them if Nadal accomplishes it, just because I suggested it as being possible. People are that dumb, to write something off so easily.
And there are probably about 100 posters who have gone on record saying Djokovic will beat Nadal at Roland Garros. I like my chances of owning all them.
To be fair Nadal crapped the bed when he was up 2 sets to love,and blew the breaker with some silly misses. That match never should have even gone to 5 sets.
You are talking about years ago.
Nadal has made the last 4 slams finals. Djokovic is the only player to beat him. Last year Nadal beat Murray in the French Open, Wimbledon and US Open. None of those matches even went to 5 sets.
Nadal is closer to beating Djokovic whereas. Nadal was up 4-2 in the fifth set on Djokovic's favorite slam surface.
That's because Djokovic is who he happened to play. You can't say that if someone else would've made the Wimbledon or US Open Final, that Nadal would've automatically won.
Nadal did beat Murray last year, but Murray wasn't playing at a particularly high level. All I was saying is that Murray has beaten him before and certainly has the capability to beat him.
Lastly, Nadal IS NOT closer to beating Djokovic. The AO Final was the only final that Nadal has really stretched Djokovic, and quite frankly Djokovic wasn't playing very well throughout that match. Djokovic is just a bad matchup for Nadal, like Nadal is for Federer. It's physics!
I think its safe to say 500 posters give Nadal no chance of winning the next 3 slams. I would own all of them if Nadal accomplishes it, just because I suggested it as being possible. People are that dumb, to write something off so easily.
And there are probably about 100 posters who have gone on record saying Djokovic will beat Nadal at Roland Garros. I like my chances of owning all them.
Eh clarky, clarky ... You are critical even to a "mythical" version of nadal, which most nadal fans remember with a tear in their eyes. When were you happy with the guy?
To be fair Nadal crapped the bed when he was up 2 sets to love,and blew the breaker with some silly misses. That match never should have even gone to 5 sets.
A lot of things are possible but very unlikely. This is one of those things.
Ask clarky for details
Murray's best year and best form ever was 2011. Sorry.
Oh yes, Nadal is beating Djokovic, and a post like yours won't be forgotten.
It is very likely I will own all of talk tennis by the end of 2012.
I agree completely. Federer had no business taking that match to five, let alone almost winning it. He was totally outplayed.
Not directed at you, Clarky, but I have to laugh when people say Federer isn't a fighter and point to that match where he saved championship point with one of the gutsiest shots in history.
Haha ok man...But you know I'm going to search you out and laugh in your face when Djokovic beats Nadal AGAIN this year at Indian Wells, Miami, Rome, Madrid...the list goes on and on.
Good lord man!!! What are you smoking?!? I want some
I think Fed is a bigger fighter than people give him credit for,too. I also think he is mentally tougher than people think he is as well. You do not win 16 slams without being solid in the mental department.
Firstly, I said nothing about Indian Well, Miami, Rome, Madrid. So I don't care who wins those.
Secondly, even though I didn't predict Nadal would win any of those events, I will bump this great post of yours if Nadal does.
Thirdly, all I care about is the slams.
You don't know how many people have given 2012 to Djokovic/Federer already. I truly will own talk tennis. And my username will be a constant reminder.