That really says it all. The overwhelming majority of retirements (just over 6 out of every 7) are by players who are trailing in the match.Players retire when down from most matches. Using the same dataset (2000-22):
Total retirements: 2,054
Retired while down: 1,769 (86.1%)
Retired while tied: 118 (5.7%)
Retired while up: 167 (8.1%)
Splitting it up by Bo3 vs Bo5, we get:I suspect that grass is only on top percentage wise because the grass season around Wimbledon is so short that the proportion of best of 5 matches is just higher in comparison to the other surfaces. And of course in best of 5 there is more time to get injured and retire.
Carpet with almost no best of 5 at all is the opposite example.
Surface | Matches | Retirements |
---|---|---|
Hard (Bo3) | 29,514 | 770 (2.61%) |
Hard (Bo5) | 7,884 | 335 (4.25%) [+1.64%] |
Clay (Bo3) | 17,835 | 514 (2.88%) |
Clay (Bo5) | 4,528 | 162 (3.58%) [+0.70%] |
Grass (Bo3) | 4,128 | 127 (3.08%) |
Grass (Bo5) | 2,916 | 93 (3.19%) [+0.11%] |
Carpet (Bo3) | 1,581 | 44 (2.78%) |
Carpet (Bo5) | 458 | 9 (1.97%) [-0.81%] |
I guess it makes sense grass bo5 has the lowest pct. As it's both good for the joints AND has the shortest rallies.Splitting it up by Bo3 vs Bo5, we get:
Surface Matches Retirements Hard (Bo3) 29,514 770 (2.61%) Hard (Bo5) 7,884 335 (4.25%) [+1.64%] Clay (Bo3) 17,835 514 (2.88%) Clay (Bo5) 4,528 162 (3.58%) [+0.70%] Grass (Bo3) 4,128 127 (3.08%) Grass (Bo5) 2,916 93 (3.19%) [+0.11%] Carpet (Bo3) 1,581 44 (2.78%) Carpet (Bo5) 458 9 (1.97%) [-0.81%]
It looks like the incidence of retirements goes up for Bo5 pretty across the board (as you'd expect), but the most dramatic increase is on HC
Carpet is a pretty small sample size so we can't say much
Carpet has a surprisingly big ratio of Best of 5 matches without having a Slam. Looks like quite a lot of countries chose it in the old Davis Cup format. Because otherwise it would only be a few finals of WTF, Masters and some smaller tournaments who could chose it back then before 2007.Splitting it up by Bo3 vs Bo5, we get:
Surface Matches Retirements Hard (Bo3) 29,514 770 (2.61%) Hard (Bo5) 7,884 335 (4.25%) [+1.64%] Clay (Bo3) 17,835 514 (2.88%) Clay (Bo5) 4,528 162 (3.58%) [+0.70%] Grass (Bo3) 4,128 127 (3.08%) Grass (Bo5) 2,916 93 (3.19%) [+0.11%] Carpet (Bo3) 1,581 44 (2.78%) Carpet (Bo5) 458 9 (1.97%) [-0.81%]
It looks like the incidence of retirements goes up for Bo5 pretty across the board (as you'd expect), but the most dramatic increase is on HC
Carpet is a pretty small sample size so we can't say much
It's mostly DC, and a handful from WTF and MastersCarpet has a surprisingly big ratio of Best of 5 matches without having a Slam. Looks like quite a lot of countries chose it in the old Davis Cup format. Because otherwise it would only be a few finals of WTF, Masters and some smaller tournaments who could chose it back then before 2007.
The other thing to note is that retirements are way up across the board, regardless of surface or BO3/BO5I guess it makes sense grass bo5 has the lowest pct. As it's both good for the joints AND has the shortest rallies.
One could argue that you’re able to chase down more balls, points go longer and all of that adds to the toll on the body. A point on grass or fast indoor hard is over much much faster with far less running usually.This is the type of question/thread that only someone who's never played the sport or even put any meaningful thought watching tennis besides following the ball bounce from one side of the net to the other.
In short, clay gives you much more time to set up and strike the ball than any other surface, so you're not rushing/ on a full stretch to reach a ball half the time. And after you sprint to hit the ball you don't come to a sudden stop that adds an unreal amount of stress to soft tissue.
Not as amazing as the Serbian player's magic potion, a concoction that only works for him.Clay has magical healing properties that only work for the Nadal.
Oh here comes the only guy who plays tennis.This is the type of question/thread that only someone who's never played the sport or even put any meaningful thought watching tennis besides following the ball bounce from one side of the net to the other.
In short, clay gives you much more time to set up and strike the ball than any other surface, so you're not rushing/ on a full stretch to reach a ball half the time. And after you sprint to hit the ball you don't come to a sudden stop that adds an unreal amount of stress to soft tissue.
Thanks. So the surface has no relation to injuries.Running the numbers on a dataset of 68,844 tour matches from 2000 to 2022, we have:
Surface Matches Retirements Hard 37,398 1,105 (2.95%) Clay 22,363 676 (3.02%) Grass 7,044 220 (3.12%) Carpet 2,039 53 (2.60%)
The numbers say more players retire mid-match on clay than on HC; but it's not a big difference
On clay he rarely has injuries in the scoreline as often as on hard.Because he only retires when losing, and he loses a lot less on clay.
Because on Hard he has to push himself to the limits while on clay he usually cruises. Also on clay he can play on a high level even a bit hampered whereas on hard he only would do that if he is way better than the opponent or close to the victory. But I think the most important factor is the recovery time after WTF. Nowadays he skips many tourneys which helps a bit but even then he gets injured every now and then, it's like his body can't cope with more than 30-40 matches per year.Oh here comes the only guy who plays tennis.
I've played tennis for 10 years. I always choose hardcourts because they are cheaper and I've never had a single serious injury in my life.
If what you say is true you will tell me that Djokovic, Federer, Murray and others got injured more on hard/grass than clay too? Will show me the numbers please?
His schedule since 2020 has been pretty light. 34 matches in 2020, 29 in 2021, and 47 last year.Nowadays he skips many tourneys which helps a bit but even then he gets injured every now and then, it's like his body can't cope with more than 30-40 matches per year.
Where did you find this?Running the numbers on a dataset of 68,844 tour matches from 2000 to 2022, we have:
Surface Matches Retirements Hard 37,398 1,105 (2.95%) Clay 22,363 676 (3.02%) Grass 7,044 220 (3.12%) Carpet 2,039 53 (2.60%)
The numbers say more players retire mid-match on clay than on HC; but it's not a big difference
I wrote a program to calculate it from Jeff Sackmann's data:Where did you find this?
He took MTO when he was leading against Del Potro in Wimbledon 2011
LMAO this was the one where he thought he “broke his foot.” He proceeds to call a time out in the middle of the tiebreaker, ascertains that he has in fact not broken his foot, continues the match and wins against a Delpo who playing pretty well.
You are ignoring the fact that there not too many abrupt changes of directions on clayClay is easier on the body if you look at it in nearly complete isolation of a single shot, that is true.
But clay encourages longer rallies. An ace or a serve + forehand put away on HC is not going to be as taxing on the body as a 6+ shot rally on clay.
Clay also has more unpredictable bounces, that can result in needing to make last second adjustments to your shot
Something else worth noting is that HC courts used on the pro tour have an acrylic layer on top for additional cushioning; it's not the same as the concrete courts you'll find in most recreational play
Yes, Nadal was winning when he realized he wasn't injured.Yeah well he was winning when it happened, which was the point...
That's why I said in total isolation, moving to the ball and hitting a shot is easier on clay than on HC, but the surface has its disadvantages when it comes to injury potentialYou are ignoring the fact that there not too many abrupt changes of directions on clay
I guess you either haven't played whole seasons on both hc and clay, or you are a grinder?That's why I said in total isolation, moving to the ball and hitting a shot is easier on clay than on HC, but the surface has its disadvantages when it comes to injury potential
What is the excuse in the following 10 out of 12 HC matches vs. Djokovic (after 2012 AO Final)? Who wore him down, what let him down, what injury came back?Nadal could have beaten Federer and Djokovic in past AO finals but was worn out from dmitrov battle
and was ahead in the final set till he just hit a wall. During the final vs Nole his bh let him down after
an easy put away ball inside the service box that would have put him up a break in the final set
(he went nuts improving that side afterwards in training and now his BH is one of the best strokes
we have ever seen even though it was improved late in his career)
Yes, Nadal was winning when he realized he wasn't injured.
There is no excuse but was close to winning vs Nole in that AO Final which does not count but was the reason Nadal BH improved out of sight.What is the excuse in the following 10 out of 12 HC matches vs. Djokovic (after 2012 AO Final)? Who wore him down, what let him down, what injury came back?
What point in the TB? His MTO was taken just before the TB.He was winning at that point in the TB as well... search your memory banks... there was absolutely no reason for him to fake anything at that point come on...
Of course, he stops playing to support that sick narrative.Because he’s never actually injured most of the time, he just pretends to be a sickly dying man to fuel the narrative that every slam he won was the final moment. Every slam he’s won since about 2014 was “the last one”.
Clay is the most forgiving.
“Welcome new user”Hi, I am a TTW New User and I'd like to discuss some important topics spontaneously.
![]()
Djokovic would not have won 7 Wimbledon titles or 9 Australian Open titles in the 90s, by no means.There is no excuse but was close to winning vs Nole in that AO Final which does not count but was the reason Nadal BH improved out of sight.
There is no doubt Nole is better than Nadal on HCs and Nadal was lucky enough to be in the homogenized era for HCs as well.
If conditions in Wimby, USO and AO were not slowed down Nadal would have likely only have a couple of majors outside RG.
of course but nadal 'd have zero (wimbys) of them which is even worseDjokovic would not have won 7 Wimbledon titles or 9 Australian Open titles in the 90s, by no means.
![]()
Courier was a finalist in that era and Nadal is 10 times better than him, so...of course but nadal 'd have zero (wimbys) of them which is even worse![]()
Still not enough to beat PeteCourier was a finalist in that era and Nadal is 10 times better than him, so...
![]()
More demanding, yet less injury prone.Clay is way more demanding physically and mentally for tennis than hard courts.
This is what separates European players to the rest of the world.
Nadal could have beaten Federer and Djokovic in past AO finals but was worn out from dmitrov battle
and was ahead in the final set till he just hit a wall. During the final vs Nole his bh let him down after
an easy put away ball inside the service box that would have put him up a break in the final set
(he went nuts improving that side afterwards in training and now his BH is one of the best strokes
we have ever seen even though it was improved late in his career)
So many players have no clue how to win on clay after playing mainly on hardcourts and dont have
the stamina or patience required.
Nadal is lucky conditions are slower than when Kuerten had to win on hardcourts but either way
his mentality even playing at 70% was enough to win the AO last year without Nole around.
Can you give another valid explanation as to why he magically gets better on clay courts?Of course, he stops playing to support that sick narrative.
![]()
Can you explain to me how magically your guy won the Australian Open 2021 with an abdominal tear?Can you give another valid explanation as to why he magically gets better on clay courts?
Answer my question first and I’ll answer yoursCan you explain to me how magically your guy won the Australian Open 2021 with an abdominal tear?
![]()
Yes true but neither would Murray win anything if you look at Aussie OpenDjokovic would not have won 7 Wimbledon titles or 9 Australian Open titles in the 90s, by no means.
![]()
10 times is not crazy. As a percentage of their total matches it’s minuscule.Very interesting. So both retire like crazy when they are down, but Djokovic is a little more believable overall.