nolefam_2024
Bionic Poster
Because 2 years is nothing in grand scheme of things. 2 years is absolutely nothing.
At Slams Nadal did it best? How? He hasn't won Wimbledon since 2010.Its about who you beat and when and where. At slams Nadal did it best.
At Slams Nadal did it best? How? He hasn't won Wimbledon since 2010.
He still hasn't won it in going on 14 years. Living off glory from one win doesn't mean he did it best. His Wimbledon winning years only lasted for 2 years (2008-2010), while Djokovic's was 11 years.Yeah but when he won, he knocked off prime Federer... not old man Rogi...
AO09: def #2 Federer (27 yo)
RG12: def #1 Djokovic (25 yo)
WIM08: def #1 Federer (26 yo)
US13: def #1 Djokovic (26 yo)
That's what he was talking about...
He still hasn't won it in going on 14 years. Living off glory from one win doesn't mean he did it best. His Wimbledon winning years only lasted for 2 years (2008-2010), while Djokovic's was 11 years.
Lol put that work in bestieNadal's first and only multi slam year came in federer's supposed peak then. This guy has tailgated on those 1/2 slam wins vs Federer way back in 2000s until this day and his fans did the same. Instead of staying in real time, they always went back to 2008 and made up stories.
That's how nadal's supposed peak in Wimbledon even eclipsed Djokovic's in mind of the rafans. This guy Nadal, the lefty spinner, had huge advantage over Federer match up wise and still barely defeated Federer in 1 final. But he WAS built like some unstoppable force for a decade. It is good that he kept getting exposed in 2010s.
2012 vs rosol
13 vs darcis
14 vs kyrgios
15 vs brown
17 vs muller
It was a sight to behold every year seeing these upsets.
He played Federer 1 time. Was a 4 set match just like nadal's 2019. Stop trying to portray like he lost to Roger 10 times before.Yep... count the years Djok didn't win but exclude Nadal's...
fwiw, Rafa was in Wimbledon winning form in 06, 07, 11 and 18 as well...
Reality is, Djok couldn't beat Fed at Wimbledon until Fed was 32... with a 6 year age advantage...
I meant overall while the big 3 were all playing.At Slams Nadal did it best? How? He hasn't won Wimbledon since 2010.
The big 3 all played at the same time for 9 and a half years after his last Wimbledon win though. The person that did it best at Slams would be winning all 4 at least somewhat closer together throughout their 20 year career, correct?I meant overall while the big 3 were all playing.
There are 4 slams. If you are placing more emphasis on wimbledon than the others fair enough but if so then rank the slams in ordsr of importance. Im amazed professionals are never asked this queztion hut i guess in this era and society any comment could be deemed offensive.The big 3 all played at the same time for 9 and a half years after his last Wimbledon win though. The person that did it best at Slams would be winning all 4 at least somewhat closer together throughout their 20 year career, correct?
I think Wimbledon is the most important Slam and then the others because of its history, but I feel they all have equal weight in the 21st century. I'm talking about that one because of how long it's been since he won it.There are 4 slams. If you are placing more emphasis on wimbledon than the others fair enough but if so then rank the slams in ordsr of importance. Im amazed professionals are never asked this queztion hut i guess in this era and society any comment could be deemed offensive.
But it is though. Since nadal was last competitive at a slam (22 rg), Djokovic has won 4 freebie slams, 22 W, 23 AO/RG/USO vs non existent competition to take him from 2 slams behind to 2 in front. Context is needed.Because 2 years is nothing in grand scheme of things. 2 years is absolutely nothing.
Context doesn't computeBut it is though. Since nadal was last competitive at a slam (22 rg), Djokovic has won 4 freebie slams, 22 W, 23 AO/RG/USO vs non existent competition to take him from 2 slams behind to 2 in front. Context is needed.
So are ypu adding extra points for more recent wins? Sort of like they do in cricket in the test championship and fifa world rankings?I think Wimbledon is the most important Slam and then the others because of its history, but I feel they all have equal weight in the 21st century. I'm talking about that one because of how long it's been since he won it.