messiahrobins
G.O.A.T.
Always wondered if it was more than a co-incidence that Dimitrov's best results came at events where the WTA members were not playing at the same event.Grigor Dimitrov. 32 years old and doing absolutely nothing at the majors.
Always wondered if it was more than a co-incidence that Dimitrov's best results came at events where the WTA members were not playing at the same event.Grigor Dimitrov. 32 years old and doing absolutely nothing at the majors.
The RG field will also be extremely depleted. Nadal and Djokovic will not win, Carlos and Sinner are injured.Typical TW.
Rublev wins a Masters against a completely depleted field (facing FAA in the final whos choked in 90% of his finals) and now suddenly he will win a slam.
The RG field will also be extremely depleted. Nadal and Djokovic will not win, Carlos and Sinner are injured.
Literally the favorites for the title are chokers who have no business winning a slam and that does include Rublev. Tsitsipas would be my pick for the trophy but solely because the field is decimated. So yes, Rublev literally could also win RG this year. Even Med could do it.
Ruud can win a French Open in this field imo, he has a fair record on clay vs anyone (given Djokodal stays in Helsinki)Of the ATP players currently ranked in the top-20, I'd say:
Felix, Khach, de Minaur, Ruud, Bublik, Baez
My list is probably smaller than most, mainly because I worry about how injury-prone guys like Sinner and Alcaraz might end up being. And Djoker eventually has to tail off. So I think that there will be opportunities for guys like Tsitsipas, and even Zverev in the near future.
I cannot see writing off a guy like Rune. He's barely 21 years old and has already made a 3 QFs. Where was Federer at this age? Through his age-21 season, Federer had 2 career QFs in slams, which includes 0 during his age-21 season in 2002(includes a Wimbledon 1st round exit in straights by a qualifier).
be ready to be disappointed againDimitrov
tt.tennis-warehouse.com
i'm in, as always:
in a way, grigor never disappoints... as he always does
#GriGr?
This is exactly why those claiming numbers are everything are wrong and context has to be added. If Rublev wins the FO, no way am i going to think he was greater than Dimitrov or David Ferrer for example.The RG field will also be extremely depleted. Nadal and Djokovic will not win, Carlos and Sinner are injured.
Literally the favorites for the title are chokers who have no business winning a slam and that does include Rublev. Tsitsipas would be my pick for the trophy but solely because the field is decimated. So yes, Rublev literally could also win RG this year. Even Med could do it.
Out of this list I doubt Rublev and Zverev ever will. Tsitsi has a 50/50 chance depending on the form of his opponents on clayThese players will win majors in next 5 years for sure (some of them already done so) -
1. Medvedev
2. Tsitsipas
3. Zverev
4. Alcaraz
5. Sinner
6. Rublev
Rune, Ruud, Fritz & Hubie also has an outside chance...
We are entering into a competitive era where it's gonna be more open like 80's or early 90's though quality wise it might not be as good as the era of the big 3/4...
I perfectly understand your doubts. I am not sure if Zverev or Tsitsipas even deserve a major...but my point is, there are 4 slams each year and someone or the other will be winning them (deserving or not). I can't see Alcaraz and Sinner sweeping everything next 5 years, just yet...Out of this list I doubt Rublev and Zverev ever will. Tsitsi has a 50/50 chance depending on the form of his opponents on clay
These players will win majors in next 5 years for sure (some of them already done so) -
1. Medvedev
2. Tsitsipas
3. Zverev
4. Alcaraz
5. Sinner
6. Rublev
Rune, Ruud, Fritz & Hubie also has an outside chance...
We are entering into a competitive era where it's gonna be more open like 80's or early 90's though quality wise it might not be as good as the era of the big 3/4...
Rublev is +2800 for rg. That is like 3% chance to win RG.Barring some miracle dream draw Rublev isn’t winning any slam.