Nestor/Zimonjic exposed!!

hcb0804

Hall of Fame
The number one doubles team confirmed last night at IW that they are no match for the the top ATP singles players. Nadal and..............Marc Lopez?? Come on!! Imagine Nestor/Zimonjic against Nadal/Federer. Would probably be 6-0, 6-0 Nadal/Federer.:twisted:
 
The number one doubles team confirmed last night at IW that they are no match for the the top ATP singles players. Nadal and..............Marc Lopez?? Come on!! Imagine Nestor/Zimonjic against Nadal/Federer. Would probably be 6-0, 6-0 Nadal/Federer.:twisted:

do not like zimonjic
 
I agree - Rafa manhandled those guys...It was so apparent that he was at a different level compared to even the best doubles players. I don't think they see the kind of consistent pace and spin off the ground that guys like Rafa produce. I was happy for Lopez - his face at the end of the match was priceless.
I think there are career doubles specialists because more top tier players don't play doubles, and as such, these guys can capitalize on that niche.
GP
 
do not like zimonjic

I agree! Saw him play a couple weeks ago against the Bryan Bros (I think) and he kept hitting at them; even noticed one of the Bros looked back at him a couple times after he went at them. Then he hits right at Lopez a couple times and yells out when Rafa's hitting the ball. Classless. I understand the idea of going at your opponent from a strategic standpoint, but to do it so often, when so close, and with such force is beyond strategy and into gamesmanship which I cannot respect.
 
I agree! Saw him play a couple weeks ago against the Bryan Bros (I think) and he kept hitting at them; even noticed one of the Bros looked back at him a couple times after he went at them. Then he hits right at Lopez a couple times and yells out when Rafa's hitting the ball. Classless. I understand the idea of going at your opponent from a strategic standpoint, but to do it so often, when so close, and with such force is beyond strategy and into gamesmanship which I cannot respect.

did you think they would pick on rafa??? of course lopez got pounded.
 
I agree! Saw him play a couple weeks ago against the Bryan Bros (I think) and he kept hitting at them; even noticed one of the Bros looked back at him a couple times after he went at them. Then he hits right at Lopez a couple times and yells out when Rafa's hitting the ball. Classless. I understand the idea of going at your opponent from a strategic standpoint, but to do it so often, when so close, and with such force is beyond strategy and into gamesmanship which I cannot respect.

I really watch those matches.
 
Nadal and Lopez played out of their skins, and the no.1 pair never got going at all. They folded rather easily after losing the first set. Nadal was a sight to behold, jumping around enthusiastically and egging his team-mate on to victory. Great match for the wild cards, and they deserved the trophy at the end.
 
so that's what the altercation is all about, i kindda missed that part, just heard the commentator about what a stupid move it was to wound Rafa up...

I agree! Saw him play a couple weeks ago against the Bryan Bros (I think) and he kept hitting at them; even noticed one of the Bros looked back at him a couple times after he went at them. Then he hits right at Lopez a couple times and yells out when Rafa's hitting the ball. Classless. I understand the idea of going at your opponent from a strategic standpoint, but to do it so often, when so close, and with such force is beyond strategy and into gamesmanship which I cannot respect.
 
Watched a bit of this match today. Very strange, seemed like Rafa and Lopez were using a one-up, one-back formation half the time.

I agree! Saw him play a couple weeks ago against the Bryan Bros (I think) and he kept hitting at them; even noticed one of the Bros looked back at him a couple times after he went at them. Then he hits right at Lopez a couple times and yells out when Rafa's hitting the ball. Classless. I understand the idea of going at your opponent from a strategic standpoint, but to do it so often, when so close, and with such force is beyond strategy and into gamesmanship which I cannot respect.

If you can't stand the heat..... this isn't USTA league, these guys are trying to live on their winnings. None of the guys on tour would hesitate to go at other guys like that.

Also I agree, no person in their right mind would hit it to Rafa.

I do wonder how double players do in singles.

Not very well on average... that's why they are usually "doubles specialist."
 
It's not a matter of taking the heat, avoiding Rafa, USTA vs Pros, or whatever other BS; Zimonjic consistently goes after people whereas others do not. Read closely before being contrary.
 
It looked like Zimonjic had a really hard time with Nadal's heavy spin. The ball wildly careened off his racket a few times - made the poor guy look ordinary...
GP
 
Maybe it was Nadal, but Zimonjic was missing routine volleys.
Didn't look bad until after the first set, though.
 
It looked like Zimonjic had a really hard time with Nadal's heavy spin. The ball wildly careened off his racket a few times - made the poor guy look ordinary...
GP

this was so true, he missed so many easy volleys up at net i'm sure he would've made against 99% of any other player, but i think he misjudged them from rafas spin as well...maybe rafa 'n andreev should play doubles :)
 
I'd like to see that - or based on the fact we are talking "singles" players, I'd kinda like to see Federer and Sampras pair up a couple of times....
 
The commentators made a point of saying that Zim and Nestor wanted to show that singles players can't just come into doubles and "clean up." I'm not sure how much of that was the commentators being dramatic, but I wonder if the top doubles players think along those lines. Zimonjic was definitely struggling but I was surprised Rafa couldn't get a better look at his serve.
 
This is old news.

There is a reason Roger & Stan won the gold medal, and not the Bryan bros.

Double players are no match for the top single players.

Period.
 
post regarding rafa interview link they also asked him who would he NOT want as a partner. answer soderling
 
Last edited:
Actually Lopez and Nadal make a pretty good pair. Lopez has got more than decent volleys, and they pair up quite well with Nadal's spinny lefty serve which is hard for the opponent to attack. He also has a heavy, hard forehand.

Nadal is no elite volleyer, but he can put balls away with good finesse, not to mention that he is a BEAST of a baseliner for players who normally play doubles. With a wider court to hit at i think Nadal tends to hit much harder with much lower net clearance, and his spinning monsters are just a PAIN for the opponent in front of the net to handle.
 
Anyone else feel that Fed and Nadal NEED to pair up and play at least one doubles tournie together?

Yes they should, just to make things interesting, and to see how they'll play as a team. But I did hear that Roger wasn't too keen...... :(

http://www.rawstory.com/news/2006/Federer_declines_Nadal_s_doubles_of_09042006.html

According to this article, Nadal offered to play dubs with Rog, but Fed declined. However, he did imply that he would have liked to, but he didn't want to jeopardize his schedule. I think (and hope) that it could still happen sometime in the future.
 
http://www.rawstory.com/news/2006/Federer_declines_Nadal_s_doubles_of_09042006.html

According to this article, Nadal offered to play dubs with Rog, but Fed declined. However, he did imply that he would have liked to, but he didn't want to jeopardize his schedule. I think (and hope) that it could still happen sometime in the future.

I don't know if this is the same time but a few years back Nadal asked Fed for Madrid, when it was hard court, but Fed already had a partner.
 
Actually Lopez and Nadal make a pretty good pair. Lopez has got more than decent volleys, and they pair up quite well with Nadal's spinny lefty serve which is hard for the opponent to attack. He also has a heavy, hard forehand.

Nadal is no elite volleyer, but he can put balls away with good finesse, not to mention that he is a BEAST of a baseliner for players who normally play doubles. With a wider court to hit at i think Nadal tends to hit much harder with much lower net clearance, and his spinning monsters are just a PAIN for the opponent in front of the net to handle.

It was great to see him in doubles on a hard court ... and winning the tournament against the current #1 doubles team. In the tradition of Johnny Mac, he should play more dobs, which will help him with hard court singles. Also, it added juice to the finals and it semed that there was more interest by the spectators.
 
The commentators made a point of saying that Zim and Nestor wanted to show that singles players can't just come into doubles and "clean up." I'm not sure how much of that was the commentators being dramatic, but I wonder if the top doubles players think along those lines. Zimonjic was definitely struggling but I was surprised Rafa couldn't get a better look at his serve.

That is a bit of an error though as Lopez is not a singles player. He was playing like an excellent doubles player and carried Nadal though some of their earlier matches. A team of two singles players and a team of an excellent doubles player and a singles player are two different things.
 
It was a poor match performance by Zim/Nestor. The unforced errors were atrocious.

It's also No-AD. Anyone who plays leagues know how this throws up anomalies in match results.

This says absolutely nothing about Nadal being on some other level (or any other top player who is only good at singles).
 
Also I don't see people noting how Lubjicic lost early rounds in doubles, yet plowed through many top singles players to win the tournament.

But that's just one player, one tournament, right?
 
Nestor and Zee are great players having an off night. I like them and the Bryans. I think Novak and Rafa, who share the same manager, are trying to arrange something.
 
Nestor and Zee are great players having an off night. I like them and the Bryans. I think Novak and Rafa, who share the same manager, are trying to arrange something.

Djoker and Rafa planned to play doubles last year. But when the time came, Rafa said he wasn't feeling healthy enough to risk playing doubles.
 
I'd love to see Fed and Rafa play a few really big doubles events. Just to see if they'd click quickly and destroy the field.

Most people would love to see that; may be when Fed is done winning slams and is a bit older, he'll be more prepared to play doubles.....
 
Most people would love to see that; may be when Fed is done winning slams and is a bit older, he'll be more prepared to play doubles.....

Perhaps by then he and some of the other "top players" will have acquired the requisite volleying skills to be at the top in doubles as well. Little is more repulsive in doubles than seeing the 1 up 1 back strategy because one of the poor guys is a baseliner who doesn't realize that this is doubles.
 
The number one doubles team confirmed last night at IW that they are no match for the the top ATP singles players. Nadal and..............Marc Lopez?? Come on!! Imagine Nestor/Zimonjic against Nadal/Federer. Would probably be 6-0, 6-0 Nadal/Federer.:twisted:

I was thinking the same thing - doubles is a joke.
 
Before the doubles guys are denigrated too much, someone needs to answer why the following teams lost (also at Indian Wells from the top of the draw down):

  • Andy Murray and Roger Hutchins lost in the 1st round to Roddick/Blake (by the logic in this thread, Murray should have won since he's higher ranked)
  • Roddick/Blake lost to Nestor/Zimonjic in the 2nd round
  • John Isner and Sam Querry lost to Nestor/Zimonjic in the semis (two top singles guys)
  • Cilic/Lubijic lost in the 1st round to Isner/Querry and Lubijic won the tournament
  • Gael Monfils/Oliver Simon lost in the 1st round to David Ferrer/Alberto Montanes
  • Martin Damm/Radel Stepanek lost in the 1st round to Michael Llodra and Andy Ram
  • Julian Benneteau and Jo Wily Tsonga lost to Aspelin/Hanley
  • J. Knowle/Julian Melzer lost in the 1R to Brunstrom/Rojer
  • Berdych/Kolscriiber lost ot Brunstrum/Rojer in the 2R
Personally at many of the tournaments I have attended, I find the doubles much more exciting than the singles. I would hardly call doubles a joke.
 
Before the doubles guys are denigrated too much, someone needs to answer why the following teams lost (also at Indian Wells from the top of the draw down):

  • Andy Murray and Roger Hutchins lost in the 1st round to Roddick/Blake (by the logic in this thread, Murray should have won since he's higher ranked)
  • Roddick/Blake lost to Nestor/Zimonjic in the 2nd round
  • John Isner and Sam Querry lost to Nestor/Zimonjic in the semis (two top singles guys)
  • Cilic/Lubijic lost in the 1st round to Isner/Querry and Lubijic won the tournament
  • Gael Monfils/Oliver Simon lost in the 1st round to David Ferrer/Alberto Montanes
  • Martin Damm/Radel Stepanek lost in the 1st round to Michael Llodra and Andy Ram
  • Julian Benneteau and Jo Wily Tsonga lost to Aspelin/Hanley
  • J. Knowle/Julian Melzer lost in the 1R to Brunstrom/Rojer
  • Berdych/Kolscriiber lost ot Brunstrum/Rojer in the 2R
Personally at many of the tournaments I have attended, I find the doubles much more exciting than the singles. I would hardly call doubles a joke.


Very good post. :) A few facts to stem the flood of fluff.
 
Back
Top