New Agassi film Reveals the Reasons Why He Lost to Pete Sampras in the 1990 US Open Finals


Dre lost because nobody in history would've beaten Pistol that day. Not necessarily because the 19-year-old Pete played the best tennis ever - though it's up there - but because his opponent would be so floored and intimidated by the level of all-court genius from this lanky teen the poor bloke would struggle to respond accordingly. Easily one of the all-time greatest performances, regardless of age.
great admirer of Pete's game. I never found anything 'dull' or boring in what he did or who he was. Just classic s/v tennis performed by the kind of athlete that the style richly deserves.