And yet there is a market for a closed-pattern Aero like the original.
I had an Pure Aero 2016 and really didn’t like the extremely open string spacing compared to my AeroPro 2010 and 2013 models.
I felt it gave away gave away too much precision and was difficult to flatten out my stokes.
It made my game very one-dimensional. After a couple of games, my opponent knows exactly what shot is coming. I ended up giving it to a friend.
After a 18 month break (due to a knee injury), I have started practicing again…found my weighted up Beast 98s a bit hard to handle so picked up my old AeroPro 2010.
Wow - what a racket!
Comparing it to other rackets - I feel like I have so much variety in my shots:
- can flatten out forehand and backhand shots and turn on insane amounts of spin (vs my other rackets) at will to work angles or control the power of the racket.
- Slice is a weapon with this racket
- Returns are solid
- Volleys ok considering it’s not designed to excel in this area
- Serves are powerful and loaded with so much topspin. Slice and kick serves are great. Having trouble with a flat 1st serve but I’m pretty rusty after 18 months off so most likely the toss and timing.
Overall - I don’t remember a racket making such a noticeable difference as this AeroPro 2010.
I’m with you Bartelby - bring back the AeroPro string spacing. You can hit hit great topspin with good technique and still flatten the ball out.
IMO the Pure Aero provides easy topspin even with questionable technique, but you can kiss flat strokes goodbye.