Agree with @mpournaras here. You need to try Yonex sonic cage.I ordered these in a normal width and had to send back. I have a very narrow foot and these were very wide. I normally wear Vapor Pros but Nike isn't making them anymore and I don't like how clunky the Vapor Pro 2 and Vapor 11s are for a speed type of shoe. Sadly, I'm trying other things. I'll probably just return to the Asics Speed Solutions as they are okay but not as comfy as the original Vapor Pro.
@PFG1 - looks like that 2nd pair is coming soon? hehe.
I just bought this colorway. very very excited!!!! love the blue accents. The outsole is my favorite part of this so far.
Wider, softer, more durable. Not quite so fastHow does it compare to Asics Speed FF 2? Thanks.
Wider, softer, more durable. Not quite so fast
Enough for me. I am a very middle of the road kinda guy. I like these as much as the Nike VC4. I think an insole could go a long way here if you have high archesFor V4 I don't feel like there is enough support. Is the V5 better?
They were boats length wise in addition to being super wide. I'd go down at least a half size.How’s length? I had a pair of Lotto Raptors and Lav 2’s sent both in 11.5 and the Raptors fit great and the Lav’s were boats. Thinking I’d need an 11 here to be safe …
I'm curious about Yonex shoes. I might have to give them a try.You need to try Yonex shoes
I'm curious about Yonex shoes. I might have to give them a try.
They were boats length wise in addition to being super wide. I'd go down at least a half size.
I just converted to the Eclipsion 4 from the Solution Speed FF2 and love them.I'm curious about Yonex shoes. I might have to give them a try.
The real question is how it compares to the Asics Court FF3 - not the outgoing FF2.How does it compare to Asics Speed FF 2? Thanks.
Tried the Eclipsion 4 too. They fit well, but they did feel a bit stiff, heavier, and less cushioned than than the New Balance 996 V5 IMO. The Eclipsion 4 felt more "tailored" to my foot than the 996 V5, but after walking around the house in them for a half hour, my feet started to hurt a bit. Pretty firm. Red flag. No such issue with the 996 V5. Maybe I needed to break the E4 in some to get a fair comparison, but if my feet hurt wearing them around the house, that is not normally a good sign. I sent them back.I just converted to the Eclipsion 4 from the Solution Speed FF2 and love them.
Asics are narrower and lighter but make my feet hotter. And in the case of the FF2 some part of how the tongue is made started digging into the top of my foot very painfully.
The E4 feels almost as fast but is more stable and comfortable. They have a bit more of a lateral flange than can be noticed in pictures, but not Solecourt Boost levels where you feel like you'll trip over it. It's just right to create a very stable forefoot.
They are heavier, but that doesn't bother me
6 Month Guarantee is included as per TW.I did not find the v5 particularly durable but they are indeed very comfy and stable. I cannot imagine they will offer a 6-month guarantee as they may go broke haha
The real question is how it compares to the Asics Court FF3 - not the outgoing FF2.
Seems like there are a few shoes trying to compete for the speed / stability / comfort market now: Asics Court FF3; Yonex Power Cushion Eclipsion 4; Diadora B.Icon; Nike Vapor 11; Adidas Cybersonic; Babolat Jet Mach 3; and Lotto Raptor 100. How do you think the New Balance 996v5 stacks up?
I know it is better than the Nike Vapor 11 and the Adidas Cybersonic IMO - I have compared those already head to head. Have any of you compared the others?
I just converted to the Eclipsion 4 from the Solution Speed FF2 and love them.
Asics are narrower and lighter but make my feet hotter. And in the case of the FF2 some part of how the tongue is made started digging into the top of my foot very painfully.
The E4 feels almost as fast but is more stable and comfortable. They have a bit more of a lateral flange than can be noticed in pictures, but not Solecourt Boost levels where you feel like you'll trip over it. It's just right to create a very stable forefoot.
They are heavier, but that doesn't bother me
I was just including both shoes in the list of shoes that were in that general category. I agree with you, though - they are apples and oranges.i think it is wrong to compare v5 to court FF3. One is fast shoes one is more heavy and stable shoes. in my opinion they belong to two different catergories.
This is an excellent report. Good feedback for those of us considering this shoe for the first time. Based on your report, I would say this is a contender for me. It is down to the NB 996 v5, the Diadora B.Icon, and the new Babolat Propels FURY 3. I have tried them all (and a dozen other shoes the last year) and these stand out of the best combination of speed, stability, and cushioning for me. Nothing else is really close.Just got my pair in and played a practice match in them. White/Navy colorway. My skill level is Ex-D3 NCAA player, 205 Lbs 6 foot 3 inches, now playing 5.0 level, fluctuating between Singles UTR 9.3-10.04 past 12 months.
My foot: size 13, width is in between a D and 2E. I ordered the standard D width.
Current Shoe rotation: NB LAV v1 (match play), NB LAV v2 (practice)
First impressions:
Cushion: these feel very similar to the LAV v1. To me the LAV v1 have a medium firm cushion with a low to the ground feel. In contrast to the LAV v2 which have a high stack, high plushy soft cushiony feel, high up platform feel when playing. This is a great departure from the 996 V4/4.5 which felt like the cushion would bottom out quickly which hurt my heel when sliding on Hard courts.
Fit/Feel: When playing in these, I felt very stable. Did not encounter toe jamming. The width felt perfect for my in between feet. I have a similar experience with the LAV v1 and v2. They are not the same width as lets say a standard D nike Vapor pro or Vapor react. They do indeed fit wider than a standard D despite claiming it is a Standard D. Lastly, I use Move Insoles in these and they fit great without feeling like my heel would pop out of the shoe as I felt in the Lav V2 (easily fixed with a runner's knot).
Personal Conclusion: I think NB nailed it with this one. As some others have said this is a tweener shoe much like the LAV v1 felt to me. Great low to the ground feel with comfortable (not plush) cushioning that is fast on court. To my feet this is a winner, lets see how it holds up after 3 weeks of 10+ hours on courts each week.
FWIW...I burned through Yonex Fusion Rev 4s so fast that Yonex actually agreed to warranty them. The vendor where I purchased them told me they had never seen Yonex warranty a pair. But yeah, I destroyed them, and I wont go back. But they were comfy as hell.
Wont lie - I did not like the Yonex Eclipsion 3 at all. My heel kept slipping with/without orthotics with a runner's knot applied. I had to give them away cause my foot would occasionally come out of the shoe mid point.
This experience has kept me away from the E4.
How many hours or how many weeks/months did it last, and how often did you play?
Eclipsion 3 was tight near my forefoot (which was mildly painful and annoying) and, lasted about 4 months playing twice a week. Other than those two downsides, everything else about how it played was fantastic. In comfort, speed and stability it was better than any other tennis shoes I have played with. Foot doctor Zach had a similar comment about its narrow width.
Curious how fusion rev compares with it?
A general question for those that tried Eclipsion 4, I noticed they got rid of the special cushion at the forefoot (only at the heel now) and was wondering how the comfort holds up.
Do you wear the same size in Yonex as you do in NB?I play 6-8 hours a week on court practicing/playing, then another 1-2 in court footwork/sprint drills. So I'd say 8-10 a week in the shoes.
They lasted me 8 weeks before I had holes in the bottoms.
May be you went up a size because you found your standard size too tight on the forefoot?
I think the addition of black on the tongue and sole makes them look 100% more masculine and would likely work best with black socks. They are legit sick and I hope to get a pair in the next 6 months when I use my durability guarantee![]()
Previewed on newbalance
![]()
Previewed on newbalance
I winder how the 996 v5 compares to the new Babolat Propulse Fury 3? I know the Fury 3 is a bit heavier but also more cushioned shoe. Both are said to have excellent playability and stability. Anyone try both these shoes? Which did you prefer?
Damn I wish there were a coco cg1 in that color.I think the addition of black on the tongue and sole makes them look 100% more masculine and would likely work best with black socks. They are legit sick and I hope to get a pair in the next 6 months when I use my durability guarantee
Okay those are tight too. I would love for a predominantly black HC pair.![]()
![]()
clay herringbone via NetShoes
Is that the Lav V3 on the left above his head?A few new 996 colorways here... funny because he wears the LAV lol
Perhaps USO clothes and shoe colors
![]()
kawhi 2. looks like the one above is the black clay oneIs that the Lav V3 on the left above his head?
I couldn't quite make out what the black shoe on the left (above TP's head) was, but it makes sense its a 996v5 if the right shoe is from the same pairkawhi 2. looks like the one above is the black clay one
I’d encourage a few more hours. Mine feel much better now after about 10 hours? Or you can move on, the stakes are low hahaReally wanted this shoe to work but I think I need to move on. Great looking shoe, but after three hours they are just not working with my feet. If anyone in the market for practically new pair of 11’s, let me know.