New Balance - Fuel Cell 996 v6

@Chairman3 - So I've had an initial two sessions and maybe 3-ish court hours with the 996 v6's, with Move Game Day Pro insoles swapped in for the stock insoles (of which are actually quite impressively thick, but just very spongy/rubbery, without much definition and certainly no heel cup or arch shank).

Overall Fit – Probably the most comfortable shoe I've ever put on straight out of the box. Absolutely zero break-in time required, with the main highlight being what feels like truly flat resting stance lateral, free from even the slightest feel that I'm tilting inside or outside, or will "fall off" the outside edge of the shoe on either side. A very full-coverage, full-contact, "true" foot bed with good ground feel. Outstanding marks for all of that.

Speed Level – Definitely a bit faster and more nimble than the FF3's, due to a combo of being a bit lighter in static weight, but also from having a heel outsole shape that is more rounded at its corners and as such, less locked to the court surface in the way that the FF3's are, making it easier to selectively roll into and out of your landings and lateral pivots, with less wear/tear on the ankle. The 996 also has a decent level of explosiveness from a stand-still, especially noticeable when I had to all-of-a-sudden lunge forward and sprint to pickup some drop shots from my opponent. Again, definitely a notch better than the FF3's, for sure. As for whether these feel as fast as something like a Vapor, though, having never worn any Nike tennis shoes (and no plans to, as they all seem poorly designed), I can't say for sure, but I would hedge against probably not. The 996's still have a decent amount of beef of a maximalist shoe, mainly from an thicker outsole and higher static weight than a lot of speed shoes.

Achilles Protection / Heel Lockdown – Versus the FF3's, these definitely don't have quite the level of bolstering around the heel, nor do they have as much heel lockdown and they definitely allow for more freedom of ankle movement as well. I've noticed more achilles inflamation than with my FF3's, so I'm cautiously skeptical as to their ability to move the needle in this department. As much as it annoys me to have to look at something like the Diadora B.Icon 3 – with no outsole warranty – I may just have to do it. Again, I'm fully aware that this is more of a "me problem" than a shoe problem, but nevertheless, I need the best solution here, and the 996 may just not be it. But I'm going to give it at least another few play sessions before I decide. (Additional to all that is of course the physio therapy, yoga and stuff like the Alfredson protocol for healing my AT)

Durability – One interesting thing to note about the uppers on these: the drag guards are now in the form of these circular little raised dimples, and from what little I've contacted the court with them, mostly in the toe area, they've seemed to wear a bit excessively, so I question the durability there. Fortunately, I'm not really that much of a foot dragger, so I probably won't need that much actually durability on the upper. Still, for those who are, a bit potentially concerning. Additionally, even with the extra-thick outsoles, I wouldn't be surprised if I blow through these (just like I blow through everything, pretty much) long before the 6-month warranty is up. I usually do so under the big toes and on the outside back corner of the heel, as I pivot quite hard on my groundies, and when you do that weighing 200 lbs, it's all but a foregone conclusion. So it will be nice having the warranty, but ultimately futile if they don't give me some better protection in the achilles department. We'll see.

Hope some of that helped. I will come back with another update as I reach my next realization with the 996 v6's.
 
Last edited:
Great write-up @Trip
Is there still ample court feel or do they feel pretty cushioned meaning almost insulated?

Also, does the level of roll feel excessive or does it feel like there is ample stability?
 
Very welcome!

Court feel I would say is a solid good to great – not exceptional, but certainly way better than most of the stuff out there with equivalently thick outsoles and midsole cushioning.

And no, the level of roll I would say almost sets the bar for how it should be designed. It's near-perfect. It provides as much stability as you would want when landing and wishing for a truly flat planting of the foot, while also allowing a near-perfect amount of ability to roll out/away, with no higher a barrier to that motion than one would ever want/need, but also not excessively prone to rolling, either. Just very well-designed overall; impressive in its balance more so than any extreme.

Hope that helps again.
 
Last edited:
Nice new color
mch996s6_nb_05_i
 
I bought the clay versions of these last year.
Very comfortable shoe. Breathable and light.

I flip between the CT rally and lacoste LG ultra for hard court. Probably should pick up on these when on sale for hard court.
 
@Chairman3 - Have had another 8-10 -ish hours on them. Although the ebb and flow of the Achilles tendonitis has made it a bit challenging to judge the protective/therapeutic qualities, I will say that I have really enjoyed the 1) "true-ness", natural flatness and connectedness to the court that these provide, from a solidly-planted perspective, 2) take-off speed, both front to back and sideways – a noticeable notch up from the FF3's, and 3) (and this one is a bit ironic) the actual balance of overall foot lockdown but also freedom of ankle articulation, which I think may actually be allowing my AT to slowly (albeit very slowly) start to heal, for throughout my history as a soccer and baseball player, I think grew accustomed to simply liking more freedom of movement and less constriction around my feet and ankles (I have fairly overbuilt musculature and connective tissue there, which I think prefers to be allowed to splay out, stretch and flex more than average bear). Durability of the bottom forefoot outsole has also been solid so far. And cushioning feels just about as minimalist as I would want to go, while still seeming like it's plenty enough, for a 6'+, 195-205lb guy (depending on time of year) who pivots pretty hard on his paws.

So in short, I don't want to make too early a conclusion, but these 996 v6 2E's are so far every bit as good the Rush Pro 4.0's and Court FF3's that I had previously, if not better overall. But I'm probably going to need another 10-20 hours to really be able to make a more concrete determination.

Playing again in them today, and I will pay special attention to my feet on your behalf while I do, and come back and make another update afterwards.
 
@Chairman3 - Have had another 8-10 -ish hours on them. Although the ebb and flow of the Achilles tendonitis has made it a bit challenging to judge the protective/therapeutic qualities, I will say that I have really enjoyed the 1) "true-ness", natural flatness and connectedness to the court that these provide, from a solidly-planted perspective, 2) take-off speed, both front to back and sideways – a noticeable notch up from the FF3's, and 3) (and this one is a bit ironic) the actual balance of overall foot lockdown but also freedom of ankle articulation, which I think may actually be allowing my AT to slowly (albeit very slowly) start to heal, for throughout my history as a soccer and baseball player, I think grew accustomed to simply liking more freedom of movement and less constriction around my feet and ankles (I have fairly overbuilt musculature and connective tissue there, which I think prefers to be allowed to splay out, stretch and flex more than average bear). Durability of the bottom forefoot outsole has also been solid so far. And cushioning feels just about as minimalist as I would want to go, while still seeming like it's plenty enough, for a 6'+, 195-205lb guy (depending on time of year) who pivots pretty hard on his paws.

So in short, I don't want to make too early a conclusion, but these 996 v6 2E's are so far every bit as good the Rush Pro 4.0's and Court FF3's that I had previously, if not better overall. But I'm probably going to need another 10-20 hours to really be able to make a more concrete determination.

Playing again in them today, and I will pay special attention to my feet on your behalf while I do, and come back and make another update afterwards.
No worries at all, I appreciate all the detailed feedback.
Found some colorways on sale and want to pull the trigger so just wanted to make sure there were no sudden fatal flaws.
I play like 35 percent on hard court, the rest on clay, so durability isn't as important to me.
I'm trying to go a little less minimalist so my main concern is that they aren't too cushy/soft but have some cushion. Really threading a needle there ha
 
@Chairman3 - Considering what you're going for, I think these split the difference about as well as anything I've ever tried, and I believe I've tried enough minimalist shoes to get a good enough sense of the cushioning "gammut", if you will. So, especially if you find a good price, I say pull the trigger. Then we can compare notes as well!
 
@Kafel69 - So far, pretty good signs. Full disclaimer: I'm 6'2" ~195-200 lbs, with a soccer player / skier background, so I tend to lever and pivot hard on my shoes, and usually end up blowing through even the most supposedly durable outsoles in well under 6 months, Rush Pro 4.0's and FF3's included. So I won't be shocked if the 996's suffer the same fate, but that's why I a 6-month outsole warranty is key for those like me, and I'll be reporting on how the experience goes with NB's customer service when that time comes. In the meantime, I care most about overall playability as the sole wears down, and I'll be reporting on that as well.

One additional note on the uppers: the forefoot drag guard rubber "dimples" seem to be pretty soft and not very durable. I'm not much of a side-foot dragger, so no feedback there, but I will occasionally drag or catch the very front tip of my foot, and in just a few times of doing that, have already pretty much shaved off all the dimpling, plus a good portion of the rubber base layer, and on one shoe I'm already right down to the fabric weave below all of that (!). Usually, in most shoes, I end up blowing through the outsoles before any above-ground toe wear gets too severe, but I'll be interested to see if that's the case with the 996's.

More reporting to come, for sure.
 
Last edited:
@Kafel69 - So far, pretty good signs. Full disclaimer: I'm 6'2" ~195-200 lbs, with a soccer player / skier background, so I tend to lever and pivot hard on my shoes, and usually end up blowing through even the most supposedly durable outsoles in well under 6 months, Rush Pro 4.0's and FF3's included. So I won't be shocked if the 996's suffer the same fate, but that's why I a 6-month outsole warranty is key for those like me, and I'll be reporting on how the experience goes with NB's customer service when that time comes. In the meantime, I care most about overall playability as the sole wears down, and I'll be reporting on that as well.

One additional note on the uppers: the forefoot drag guard rubber "dimples" seem to be pretty soft and not very durable. I'm not much of a side-foot dragger, so no feedback there, but I will occasionally drag or catch the very front tip of my foot, and in just a few times of doing that, have already pretty much shaved off all the dimpling, plus a good portion of the rubber base layer, and on one shoe I'm already right down to the fabric weave below all of that (!). Usually, in most shoes, I end up blowing through the outsoles before any above-ground toe wear gets too severe, but I'll be interested to see if that's the case with the 996's.

More reporting to come, for sure.
we're the same height lol the most durable shoe for me so far was Ultrashot 3 (took about 4 months for warranty claim). Not sure what they did with US4, but that outsole was made out of swiss cheese and wore out in under a month (about 20hrs of court time). I'm shopping for my next shoe and durability is a must, as well as 6 mo warranty, so these popped up on my radar. I did skim thru this extensive review and they, too, mentioned those rubber dimples not being durable at all: https://runrepeat.com/new-balance-fuelcell-996-v6 Not an issue for me, as i don't slide around the court too much. Thanks again!
 
So, I probably have another 5-6 hours on the 996 v6 2E's and I think I'm pretty much on the verge of switching to this shoe full time. It's pretty much all upsides as far as I can tell. Adequate cushioning for a 200lb guy, good court feel, a very nice balance of grounded, flat connection to the court with maneuverability/pivot-ability, and above all else, seems to be allowing my Achilles tendonitis to slowly start to heal. I think a good portion of that is having actually less heel to toe drop (not more, as it traditionally advocated), which allows me to feel like I'm standing with proper posture more of the time, and feels more compatible with my fairly overbuilt legs and lower tendons (from way too many years of soccer).

Now to see what kind of deals I can find on these, and what the experience is like making good on NB's 6-month outsole warranty. I'm sure I'll have an update on all that in due time.

@Chairman3 - Did you end up pulling the trigger on a pair, and if so, any early thoughts?
 
@Chairman3 - Did you end up pulling the trigger on a pair, and if so, any early thoughts?
Not yet.
One place had a colorway on closeout for 69.99 and in my size. Foolish of me to wait and miss that, which I did.
Another large retailer has a colorway for $100 with 25% off right now.
So I'll probably hurry up and do that. (Their initials are TE in case you're looking for a deal)
 
Paging @Trip
I know you're a busy man, so I'll keep it short....I think I'm ditching the 996 :eek:

For everyone else:
I've used for about 3 sessions of singles now.
The shoes are pretty good. They fit me fine but do take a little break-in. The sole and upper kind of start out a little stiff but just at the end of my session last night felt a little broken-in. I think there's still more break-in because I had the shoes laced as tight as I could without being uncomfortable and they were loosening up while playing, so probably some stretching in the upper.
You do have a little elevated feel from the thicker cushioning but court feel isn't bad. Speed is pretty good, although I didn't feel agile for my sloppy footwork. (some of this plays into why I'm ditching them.)
The shoes lacked a little spring, I noticed this on push-off to run down a ball but also on serve where I didn't feel like I could get the same out of my legs to get up to the toss.
Traction was totally fine, I never had any slips or slides or lack of trust in grip.

So here's where we get into the not as good [for my feet].
I don't feel like I can stand naturally in these shoes and this is the main reason for me ditching them.
One of my feet is i think pretty close to flat and the other has say a normal arch and something about the shape or design causes my feet to feel like they're pronating even when just standing still. I don't feel like I can just stand flat-footed and I like flat feeling shoes. I don't like a shoe to be pushing my feet one way or the other, I just like a flatter, natural stance.
No matter what I was really doing it felt like my feet were being pronated and it just didn't feel natural.
Also, I felt like I was getting some hard landings on my heels. I think the shape or design was causing me to land on the inside of my heel and not the middle or whole heel where there'd be more cushioning.

I think for most, they probably wouldn't notice and these are really high quality and comfortable shoes. But for my feet, they just feel too noticeable on court and one of my main tests is "Do I notice the shoe on my foot while playing?"
Sad ending because I loved the V3 and 4, but for others I think these probably nearly compete with a Barricade or Gel Res but with some added quickness.

If anyone wants a barely (~4hrs) used pair of Size 11 for very cheap, send me a message.
 
@Chairman3 - Thanks for the great additional feedback, though a bummer for you. It's interesting how unique we all are, for ironically I've found the 996 (the v6 at least) to be one of the most "true" feeling shoes I've ever tried, at least in terms of how perfectly flat-footed I feel in a resting/ready stance. My main hitting partner also uses the 996 v5 and praises it for the same thing, so it would appear as if the lineage does offer such a quality, but alas, not for everyone it seems.

One question for you, and apologies if you've mentioned it before: do you use custom insoles/orthotics? Personally, I'm using Move Game Day Pro insoles (one notch less comprehensive than full-blown custom orthotics, but they've worked plenty well enough for me since switching to the 996 v6), and they are definitely more firm and supportive in the arch and heel cup, versus the stock insoles, which are somewhat substantial in volume, but fairly spongy and flimsy. Presuming you do use something, which has worked well enough in other shoes, that would likely eliminate the insole variable.

Anyways, wishing you better luck in finding something that it both a better fit and a bit more bouncy and quick. I'll be following with keen interest.

As for the Size 11, if they're the 2E width, then I'm your huckleberry.
 
Last edited:
On question for you, and apologies if you've mentioned it before: do you use custom insoles/orthotics?
I'm not an insole guy, I've never had foot issues or pain and never really had trouble finding shoes that feel good, so never really thought I needed them.
Although I have tried to go to less minimalist shoes as of late to preserve my foot health.

I already have a shoe I like, Hypercourt Pinnacle. I really liked them when I first got them, then kind of waned on them chalking it up to honeymoon, but now am back pretty all-in.
My main complaint is the price. $175 ouch, even on sale $155 still ouch.
Hence why I was (and partially am) looking at cheaper options.
Hearing really good things about the Cybersonic 2 and while not a fan of the energy rod at all, the 2nd iteration is getting glowing reviews.
 
i think i'm about to pull the trigger on these. was going to order wilson rp 4.5, but looks like the durability on those is just not there... how are these holding up?
 
went ahead and pulled the trigger. i haven't seen as many complaints on these vs the Wilson RP 4.5s online, regarding durability.

I meant to comment earlier. I'm a massive fan of the v5. In fact, I'm always searching online for pairs still for sale. The v6 is a great addition to the lineup. It improved in one way but not in others. First, the durability is fantastic. I was regularly burning through v5s every 3 months. The v6 lasts about 2 months longer so far. The bad, I've had some noticeable foot discomfort in the v6. The fit from the v5 to the v6 has changed with the later being much more narrow and tight. When I wear the v6 my foot cramps and it's led to some tight calves and a sore achilles tendon. Swapping the insoles on the v6 seems to have fixed this issue. It's also worth noting the v6 is a little heavier but you won't notice on the foot.

Overall, it's a solid shoe but I hope the v7 fixes the issues I outlined as I've seen them echoed other places. Hope that helps.
 
I meant to comment earlier. I'm a massive fan of the v5. In fact, I'm always searching online for pairs still for sale. The v6 is a great addition to the lineup. It improved in one way but not in others. First, the durability is fantastic. I was regularly burning through v5s every 3 months. The v6 lasts about 2 months longer so far. The bad, I've had some noticeable foot discomfort in the v6. The fit from the v5 to the v6 has changed with the later being much more narrow and tight. When I wear the v6 my foot cramps and it's led to some tight calves and a sore achilles tendon. Swapping the insoles on the v6 seems to have fixed this issue. It's also worth noting the v6 is a little heavier but you won't notice on the foot.

Overall, it's a solid shoe but I hope the v7 fixes the issues I outlined as I've seen them echoed other places. Hope that helps.
i'm actually wearing them as i type this lol they actually look and feel like a premium shoe! i traded in my barricades for these, btw. going to put them to test on the court tomorrow and will report back. so far, i'm quite happy!
 
update: took them out earlier today. took about 30 mins or so to start breaking them in (they felt a bit tight at first), but they've felt pretty good towards the end. may need another 30mins or so to loosen up just a tad more (may need to play around with the lacing of the bottom vs the top). they def. have more cushioning than barricades that used to hurt my heels every once in a while. got them in a half size up after reading reviews that these run smaller (barricades had the same issue, so would jam the toes in the beginning). no slippage detected so far (including the hill). they do feel like they sit just a hair taller than barricades also, but not an issue while running around. i'll need a bit more time in them for the final verdict, but so far so good. my calves would normally be a bit sore after a session like today but actually feel like i have more in the tank.
 
update: took them out earlier today. took about 30 mins or so to start breaking them in (they felt a bit tight at first), but they've felt pretty good towards the end. may need another 30mins or so to loosen up just a tad more (may need to play around with the lacing of the bottom vs the top). they def. have more cushioning than barricades that used to hurt my heels every once in a while. got them in a half size up after reading reviews that these run smaller (barricades had the same issue, so would jam the toes in the beginning). no slippage detected so far (including the hill). they do feel like they sit just a hair taller than barricades also, but not an issue while running around. i'll need a bit more time in them for the final verdict, but so far so good. my calves would normally be a bit sore after a session like today but actually feel like i have more in the tank.

Mine felt really good when I swapped the insole out for the Superfeet Blue.
 
Could someone comment on how much these loosen up? I normally wear a 9.5, but that 9.5 felt a tiny bit short and tight on me. The 10 felt pretty nice, but if it loosened up much I think I'd be better off with the 9.5.

I was really impressed with the upper and lockdown on both. I wish I could take them on the court before committing.
 
Lol I totally got that :-D

I really wanted to love these though :(

The 996V3 were my favorite shoes in 4E width.

Then they became speed shoes in the 4th and 5th generations for some dumb reason - something totally different :(

Glad to see they went back to a more tanky layup just like the 3rd generation, but without the width though. I feel like just like the 3rd gen, I would have taken these in a heartbeak if it came in 4E.

Whatever, can't have it all, I guess.
They now seem to have a 4E option! Has anyone tried it?
 
Back
Top