Notorious_Junkballer
Rookie
This will be an interesting release indeed.
It's an American way to write month/day/year. And Dunlop is not from the US, so it's December the first.lol...'Coming soon 01.12.19'
me: Wait...Hasn't January 12th, 2019 come & gone? Don't they mean 01.12.20?
... thinks about it...
me: (face-palm) oh, December 1st, 2019! Dammit! Why can't we all list dates the same?
It's not that standardized everywhere else either. The Swedes, for example, use year-month-day while their neighboring countries go with day-month-year. Though when it's only about days and months, they turn them around for some reason and write day-month.@Notorious_Junkballer and @Tommy Haas, yes, I'm aware the 'we' (the US) do dates (as well as times) differently, and that was kinda my point: Why can't 'we' (e.g., the US) do things consistently w/ everyone else.
In other words...the 'lol' was directed at myself for assuming it would be written as month/day/year.
On the unit of measure, there are only 3 countries that use SAE measurements: Liberia, Myanmar, and the US. Something tells me that's an exclusive group 'we' really don't want to be in...
legit question: why do the good Dunlop frames have such hideous paint jobs? Would’ve been interested in the 3.0 but it’s a turrible color. I know we shouldn’t care about colors of rackets, but that thing is ugly.It will be hard to top the current revo 3.0..
It's a superb racket with great feel and playability.. only thing wrong with it it doesn't have the 2 stripes or a W painted on it..
The latest CX 200/400 series with its red and black coloring looks nice to me. But their predecessors, the CX 2.0 line, looked pretty messy.legit question: why do the good Dunlop frames have such hideous paint jobs? Would’ve been interested in the 3.0 but it’s a turrible color. I know we shouldn’t care about colors of rackets, but that thing is ugly.
From the Japanese site linked above there’s a table with all the specs listed, they’re all 16x19 from what I can see.What string pattern options will they have.
"Spin redefined." Huh. Spin used to be defined as the ball rotating around an axis that passes through the center. I wonder how it will be defined now.
This will be an interesting release indeed.
you..... call that interesting?Tennisnerd has released an interesting preview on these.
![]()
Dunlop Srixon SX Series Racquet Preview | Tennisnerd.net
After the success of the Dunlop CX series, the CV line gets an update with the Dunlop Srixon SX. The SX line is all about spin.tennisnerd.net
Anything related to Dunlop is interesting to me.you..... call that interesting?
I've got my eye on that 300 Tour![]()
More spin and power than the CV.
Actually yahthroat looks very pure aeroish
Let’s hope with comfortActually yah
Yep, just like the Strikes are too whitelegit question: why do the good Dunlop frames have such hideous paint jobs? Would’ve been interested in the 3.0 but it’s a turrible color. I know we shouldn’t care about colors of rackets, but that thing is ugly.
What's it like compared to the 2.0/200 series? A tweener?I ordered in the end the Revo CV 3.0 as it was for around 100 euros on Tennis Warehouse Europe. It is indeed quite ugly but I think I can live with ugly instead of spending another 100 euros on the new model.
Interesting note that I had 3 rackets measured before buying and the static weight varied 5 grams and swing weight and balance also quite a lot. I dont really undstand how racquet manufacturers have such imprecise manufacturing.
The pj isn’t bad, it’s just yellow. Quality racquet thoughI ordered in the end the Revo CV 3.0 as it was for around 100 euros on Tennis Warehouse Europe. It is indeed quite ugly but I think I can live with ugly instead of spending another 100 euros on the new model.
Interesting note that I had 3 rackets measured before buying and the static weight varied 5 grams and swing weight and balance also quite a lot. I dont really undstand how racquet manufacturers have such imprecise manufacturing.