Indeed. Although i was watching the brazilian junior tournament here in my city (brasileirão) and saw a few radical and speed users, but zero prestige users. But wilson blade is by far the most popular frame.Here in Brazil 80% of the top juniors are using the Wilson Blade. The rest is Babolat. Very few Head racquets indeed.
I play at a Head sponsored academy here in São Paulo. Most of the competitive juniors are playing with Radicals (mainly Graphene Touch), but there are a few playing with the CV Blade. No Prestiges at all, the ocasional Speed (IG, Plain Graphene and 360), one Gravity Pro (a few more have requested one after demoing earlier this winter) and that’s it. No Babolats, but that is a sponsorship bias, I guess...Indeed. Although i was watching the brazilian junior tournament here in my city (brasileirão) and saw a few radical and speed users, but zero prestige users. But wilson blade is by far the most popular frame.
How easy is it to convert from graphene speed pro to radical touch ? I’ve been playing 18x20 all my life.I play at a Head sponsored academy here in São Paulo. Most of the competitive juniors are playing with Radicals (mainly Graphene Touch), but there are a few playing with the CV Blade. No Prestiges at all, the ocasional Speed (IG, Plain Graphene and 360), one Gravity Pro (a few more have requested one after demoing earlier this winter) and that’s it. No Babolats, but that is a sponsorship bias, I guess...
I haven’t really made that transition myself. I have played with both racquets, but only for a very limited amount of time (30 min).How easy is it to convert from graphene speed pro to radical touch ? I’ve been playing 18x20 all my life.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Racket transitions are easier when they’re customized to be of similar specs. I used to try to compare stock frames side by side but realized radically different specs throws off my technique enough that makes comparisons difficult.How easy is it to convert from graphene speed pro to radical touch ? I’ve been playing 18x20 all my life.
Throat or bridge?Molds are definitely all new. The MP has a completely different throat design, similar to the Gravity MP.
So, why did they change the mold instead of giving us the PT57A??MP = RA 59
LOLSo, why did they change the mold instead of giving us the PT57A??
Because they’re crazy!So, why did they change the mold instead of giving us the PT57A??
ThroatThroat or bridge?
I feel like i measured 64 unstrung a few weeks ago but I can find my post about it. Can measure strung later this week. Even if it is 59RA, it's not a comfortable as VC95 or VCP97.
I smell a failure on this one!I feel like i measured 64 unstrung a few weeks ago but I can find my post about it. Can measure strung later this week. Even if it is 59RA, it's not a comfortable as VC95 or VCP97.
The 360s have covered this up better, but anything with Graphene is just a snake in the grass waiting to pounce, imho.Head manipulates those RA figures, by creating an overly weak throat. You ever tried to weight up an XT Prestige Rev Pro or XT Speed Rev Pro (or any Graphene racquet)? Ever tried to swing numb chucks?
I have corrected it for youThe 360s have covered this up better, butanything withGraphene is just a snake oilin the grass waiting to pounce, imho.
Yep, we have this conversation every year when a new Head iteration comes out. Head has spent the last 5years trying to cover up their Graphene process. They’ve masked it pretty well, but it’s still there.The 360s have covered this up better, but anything with Graphene is just a snake in the grass waiting to pounce, imho.
Yeah I was ball parkingMine was a 331
Let me play devil's advocate here... and let me know if this question has been asked before b/c I wasn't here 5 years ago.Head manipulates those RA figures, by creating an overly weak throat. You ever tried to weight up an XT Prestige Rev Pro or XT Speed Rev Pro (or any Graphene racquet)? Ever tried to swing numb chucks?
Dude I just added 4 Grams to the the tip. Blessed Nelly this is perfect now. Same feel swinging but bigger sweet spot. Amazing.There was no reason to change the mold sorry. No reason at all while the Pro and S stay 95. I disagree with your assessment.
Going to have to go up 2-3 pounds in tension though.Dude I just added 4 Grams to the the tip. Blessed Nelly this is perfect now. Same feel swinging but bigger sweet spot. Amazing.
To be precise: "best prestige in a long time" could means "best prestige in a G. epoch" and "it's worse than any prestige from IG or previous gen." simultaneously.To stir the pot this morning, tennisnerd has a new post up with a quick one sentence blurb on the new prestige, "best prestige in a long time".
That’s not saying much considering how bad Graphene has beenTo stir the pot this morning, tennisnerd has a new post up with a quick one sentence blurb on the new prestige, "best prestige in a long time".
Here's hoping!
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
I thought the Wilson Ultra Tour, or the Tec 315 Ltd, or H22 was a good racquet until I hit with a Microgel Prestige Pro. It was almost as good as the IG Prestige MP.To be precise: "best prestige in a long time" could means "best prestige in a G. epoch" and "it's worse than any prestige from IG or previous gen." simultaneously.
Now the question is do I want to try the Blade v7 too? Jan is so far away!To stir the pot this morning, tennisnerd has a new post up with a quick one sentence blurb on the new prestige, "best prestige in a long time".
Here's hoping!
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
here is the US, we are going through spikes of Yonex frames, for the past few years nowHere in Brazil 80% of the top juniors are using the Wilson Blade. The rest is Babolat. Very few Head racquets indeed.
The IG Prestige is a sweet frame. Not as soft as older prestiges I find, but really hits a heavy ball when you weight it up. Also good feel and control.I thought the Wilson Ultra Tour, or the Tec 315 Ltd, or H22 was a good racquet until I hit with a Microgel Prestige Pro. It was almost as good as the IG Prestige MP.
Yep, and if you compared the IG to every other iteration after it, there would not be one that could come close to it. As cool as it would be to have a Prestige MP (or Pro) that would be close to the IGPMP or Microgel PMP, there is no way Head will get there with the Graphene process. I'm not even sure Head knows what it wants from this racquet line, or how to get there.The IG Prestige is a sweet frame. Not as soft as older prestiges I find, but really hits a heavy ball when you weight it up. Also good feel and control.
@n8dawg6"What the hel- was that?! Is this thing broken?"
I’m with you on the XTPMP, which I thought was the fastest swinging. I ended up using it for awhile. It was tolerable.Could it possibly be a bit different this time around? All three Graphene Prestige models have been disappointments, especially the feel. I can vouch that all Prestige MP frames (*Graphene) hit accurate & predictable balls. I especially thought the XT Prestige MP was an all-out, all control tennis racket that really encouraged me to take big cuts. That said, the feel just wasn't there for being a racket with such a great history.
I seriously hope Head made it closer to the IG Prestige. Maybe the Gravity Pro was the sign that the new Prestige will be softer and will have some better feel.
The problem with the last Prestige MP was not with the 3 sq in.Anyone who wants to see a real life picture of the prestige mid someone is selling one on fleabay. Just search head prestige 360.
Seems like I’m alone in thinking head made a strategic move making the MP a 98 sq in. Now it is a true competitor to the blade, pure strike vs, Dunlop cx200, tecnifibre TF40, VCore 97, pro staff 97. All are constant beam, players 98 or 98 ish sq in frames. This differs from the radical of recent years because the new radical mold is variable beam thickness. I also had to say it but 95’s seem to be phasing out. Just like 85’s then 90’s. Personally I am still holding on to some 6.1 95 frames but if I start playing more I have made up my mind to go 97-98 sq in. Now the Prestige 360 can be on the list.
Thanks for link!Anyone who wants to see a real life picture of the prestige mid someone is selling one on fleabay. Just search head prestige 360.
Seems like I’m alone in thinking head made a strategic move making the MP a 98 sq in. Now it is a true competitor to the blade, pure strike vs, Dunlop cx200, tecnifibre TF40, VCore 97, pro staff 97. All are constant beam, players 98 or 98 ish sq in frames. This differs from the radical of recent years because the new radical mold is variable beam thickness. I also had to say it but 95’s seem to be phasing out. Just like 85’s then 90’s. Personally I am still holding on to some 6.1 95 frames but if I start playing more I have made up my mind to go 97-98 sq in. Now the Prestige 360 can be on the list.
I’m sure he can’t put a link to -bay on here. The seller was wanting $350 for it. CrazyThanks for link!![]()
This has to be a fake listing right?Still there; do you think he's been arrested yet?
Interesting. He might be dumping the mids because no one want to demo them (trust me I've done the club demos). There's a good reason he's not dumping the MP, PROS or S. Not good PR with the company though. Hope he doesn't get caught.This has to be a fake listing right?
I swear I saw that photo on Talk Tennis. The arm looks familiar.
OuchThe generic public aren't racquet-0-philes like the people on this forum.
So you’re switching to the 360 MP?I can't really. I can tell you they are different and in a good way. However, HEAD marketing will dictate the angle they want to play. If I say something or take pictures before they do their PR I will get myself and several other people in trouble. That said, I will be switching. To me, they really are a 'Game Changer' for the series. I was convinced the IG Prestige series was the best, that's no longer true.
I am. I use my IG to compare once on a while but the pros outlay the cons.So you’re switching to the 360 MP?