99Problems
New User
And so is the super bright orange an accurate description? I presume outside of going to Aux 2.0 and a new paint job, the rest remains the same...Yes, dealers have Seen it in the 2025 catalogue
And so is the super bright orange an accurate description? I presume outside of going to Aux 2.0 and a new paint job, the rest remains the same...Yes, dealers have Seen it in the 2025 catalogue
I don't think the power and spin was as good on the XTC as it is now.The xtc 305 was butter. And that carried around 328 avg swing weight.
I’d prefer a more control oriented racket.I don't think the power and spin was as good on the XTC as it is now.
Please post specs on the 305 please. Beam, Sw, balance.
Would be helpful as I’m in the market for either keeping my 305 iso, upgrading to the new tfight or going with gravity pro
I might send you a private message.305: SW 290, Balance 315.
I guess its a more "customizeable" setup, instead of already feeling like a pro-stock.
Box beam. Thinner beam. Lower SW.So what’s been the difference in playability between the 305s 18*19
XTC vs and the iso
Has the iso got the most spin ?
305: SW 290, Balance 315.
Still the same rectangular grip shape I suppose ?305: SW 290, Balance 315.
I guess its a more "customizeable" setup, instead of already feeling like a pro-stock.
I'm intrigued, would love to see any leaked photosAs someone mentioned in another thread, for the Radical, think the current Extreme, but orange instead of yellow.
Sorry, no pics. I saw it in person but didn't sneak any photos.I'm intrigued, would love to see any leaked photos
my brother in christ, this stick already exists. it’s called the prestige MP-L + a tiny bit of lead.Don't know about you all, but I am waiting and spreading the word for Head to bring back Prestige classic 102 with below specs: (If head wants to stay in the game)
Ok so a Head Prestige with below specs:
100 or 102 sq inch head size,
21-22mm beam,
16 x19 pattern, RA flex between 58 - 62, not a point more,
strung balance 6-8pts head light,
strung swing weight exactly 321 or not more than 325.
This will sell like hot cakes and will bring head prestige brand back in the game.
Why did they release a classic 2.0 with 93 head size. They should fire that guy.
There was a classic Head Prestige with 102 head size back in the day, but they killed it.
In today's game to stand against heavy topspin, you need 100 or 102 at least (recreational one handed backhand 4.0 - 4.5 folks).
Head Size: 99 in² / 638.71 cm² | ||||
Length: 27in / 68.58cm | ||||
Strung Weight: 11.2oz / 318g | ||||
Balance: 12.79in / 32.49cm / 6 pts HL | ||||
Swingweight: 309 | ||||
Stiffness: 61 | ||||
Beam Width: 21.5mm / 21.5mm / 21.5mm | ||||
Composition: Auxetic 2/Graphene Inside/Graphite | ||||
Power Level: Low | ||||
Stroke Style: Full | ||||
Swing Speed: Fast | ||||
Racquet Colors: Maroon | ||||
Grip Type: Head Hydrosorb Pro | ||||
String Pattern:
| ||||
String Tension: 48-57 pounds |
If they keep the same mold, but stiffen it up and make it a 16x19, I will gladly give them my moneyAnother Phantom 93?
It's niceAny pics of 2025 Gravity?
I've seen it. The paint job is slickPure Drive is mid January 2025.
The SW on the 305 is kind of nuts. I get why, but rec players around 4.0+ are just not going to reach for a 315 even if it has a lower SW than the 305.Yeap. But they are loosing customers due to the high SW. Most club players can’t use medvedevs racquet. Their marketing team heard those complaints and are making changes. They must found a way to produce stable racquets with low SWs like other companies do nowadays.
I quite like Auxetic 2.0. I feel connected and have direct feel. Reminds of the classic HEAD feel of the 80’s and 90’s.Hey Head, if you're listening, for whatever replaces Auxetic 2.0, will you please go back to truly direct/connected layups again? The extra muting/dampening filler nonsense has to stop. It's awful, across the board.
Same mold, same stiffness, but 16x19, I will gladly give them my moneyIf they keep the same mold, but stiffen it up and make it a 16x19, I will gladly give them my money
I didn't watch the video, but IMO the graphics are a step down from the current version.
I also like it a lot, along with the other dampening technologies from Wilson and Yonex, for example. For some of us that play every day or frequently, they are very nice.I quite like Auxetic 2.0. I feel connected and have direct feel. Reminds of the classic HEAD feel of the 80’s and 90’s.
I'm intrigued, would love to see any leaked edit.....
Where can you see it?The New Head Radical line Looks pretty cool
Current one is a bit to yellow-yellow (300 Tour) and the beam is slightly to thick, otherwise I would have considernd to play against similar frames for a potential switch or side-stick.Any of you guys are interested in the SX update?
I know that this should have been a Dunlop´s reply to Babolat´s Aero line but never really made it so far.Current one is a bit to yellow-yellow (300 Tour) and the beam is slightly to thick, otherwise I would have considernd to play against similar frames for a potential switch or side-stick.
I mean that's more down to marketing/pro players than anything to do with the racquets - i feel like only really the 500 has made any impact on people with Popyrin and Draper using the PJ - especially when Aero has Alcaraz, Nadal, Rune and myriad other pros playing with it vs... Kecmanovic - i feel like ppl just aren't looking at the DunlopI know that this should have been a Dunlop´s reply to Babolat´s Aero line but never really made it so far.
That's exactly the point - the endorsements for the SX line are lame...I can think only of Kecmanovic using it? And this is not a marketing thriller by any means. But Draper with Popyrin especially nowadays have nice visibility and the FX line might get some attention. I personally tried the standard and the tour FX 500 and they are quality frames but....they don't have the "X" factor unfortunately.I mean that's more down to marketing/pro players than anything to do with the racquets - i feel like only really the 500 has made any impact on people with Popyrin and Draper using the PJ - especially when Aero has Alcaraz, Nadal, Rune and myriad other pros playing with it vs... Kecmanovic - i feel like ppl just aren't looking at the Dunlop
Yes you are right. When I hear Dunlop I only think of Tires.I mean that's more down to marketing/pro players than anything to do with the racquets - i feel like only really the 500 has made any impact on people with Popyrin and Draper using the PJ - especially when Aero has Alcaraz, Nadal, Rune and myriad other pros playing with it vs... Kecmanovic - i feel like ppl just aren't looking at the Dunlop
I mean it used to be a pretty big deal until like 2010 or so - the launches of the MFil and Aerogels with Berdych/Mauresmo and quite a few other players were a pretty big deal as i recall.Yes you are right. When I hear Dunlop I only think of Tires.
Yep, and James Blake. A long steady decline from when the Max 200G was the cream of the crop back in the 80s. Their current racquets are great though, especially the new FX line - SX needs a refresh, and CX is getting better if not for their weird low swingweight issues.I mean it used to be a pretty big deal until like 2010 or so - the launches of the MFil and Aerogels with Berdych/Mauresmo and quite a few other players were a pretty big deal as i recall.
well going by the FX and CX it will be all yellow a bit like the Head ExtremeHonestly they need to get away from the yellow/black paintjob for the SX series, it looks horrible and it's just a transparent copying of Babolot's use of that color scheme for spin rackets.
Just say NO to celery sticks.well going by the FX and CX it will be all yellow a bit like the Head Extreme
Prestiges should be around this time in 2025, they are due and Head run like clockworkShouldn't we get a new Prestige line in 2025? Can somebody confirm or deny? The last line came out in 2023 (although second half of the year - I think September). So maybe not in january but late summer 25?