smithie
Professional
I’ll post it on Monday. I got to about 500 words and thought. Wow this is long :/If you dont mind, we are all here for the in depth nerdy tennis talk hahaha
I’ll post it on Monday. I got to about 500 words and thought. Wow this is long :/If you dont mind, we are all here for the in depth nerdy tennis talk hahaha
Thanks! Interesting noticing your picture now.. Im currently using a vcore and am considering the switch to the 305s (although I will also try the blade)I’ll post it on Monday. I got to about 500 words and thought. Wow this is long :/
I got the 300s, added 8g lead to handle and 1g to 9 and 3 (total 2g), total weight with dampener and overgrip is now 331g and balance 32.5cm.
What a great feeling racket, have played with dr98, vcore 95 2018, vcore pro 97 hd and latest dunlop cx 400 tour with similar specs than this new 300s tfight.
More power, maneurability and spin is great, the pattern is similar in the middle as in the cx 400 tour, but the overall spacing is little wider.
What would you say if you compare it with dunlop cx400 tour?
I need to play more to get the timing and shots dialed in and maybe add more lead to get the stability, now it feels that racket is twisting in the off center shots and if I am guiding the ball in the they are going long. Still the extra power and spin is addictive and my shots are heavier.
Handle is wider and I swapped the base grip and removed the tape from the sides (left the tape to top and bottom sides), which made the grip feel more similar to yonex and dunlop handles. I am interested in trying the 305s model, which I am thinking of buying mainly to get the tighter string spacing in the middle for extra control.
I have also played with percept 100d, vcore pro 97 and newer ezones, but I dont like the vdm or muted feeling at all.
What would you say if you compare it with dunlop cx400 tour?I got the 300s, added 8g lead to handle and 1g to 9 and 3 (total 2g), total weight with dampener and overgrip is now 331g and balance 32.5cm.
What a great feeling racket, have played with dr98, vcore 95 2018, vcore pro 97 hd and latest dunlop cx 400 tour with similar specs than this new 300s tfight.
More power, maneurability and spin is great, the pattern is similar in the middle as in the cx 400 tour, but the overall spacing is little wider.
I need to play more to get the timing and shots dialed in and maybe add more lead to get the stability, now it feels that racket is twisting in the off center shots and if I am guiding the ball in the they are going long. Still the extra power and spin is addictive and my shots are heavier.
Handle is wider and I swapped the base grip and removed the tape from the sides (left the tape to top and bottom sides), which made the grip feel more similar to yonex and dunlop handles. I am interested in trying the 305s model, which I am thinking of buying mainly to get the tighter string spacing in the middle for extra control.
I have also played with percept 100d, vcore pro 97 and newer ezones, but I dont like the vdm or muted feeling at all.
200km/hour sure... is it u andy rodick? i didnt know former atp players are chating on tw forums .Today, I played my third match with the 305S. My racket has the following specs: 330 g, 31.6 cm balance, 321 swingweight, strung with Grapplesnake Alpha. I’m surprised by how much topspin this racket generates for an 18x19 string pattern and how effortlessly it handles every shot – short topspin angles, deep topspin shots, or flat shots from the baseline. This racket simply doesn’t care what you throw at it.
I mostly play on clay, and these specs are perfect for an aggressive playing style on this surface. My serve is my biggest weapon, and with this racket, it's unreal. Usually, aces aren’t that common on clay, but today, the ball was explosively powerful on serve – I hit at least two aces per service game. Sure, there were some double faults, but I felt so confident that every first serve was between 190-200 km/h, and I was able to place them quite accurately.
What has annoyed me the most about most rackets, even the ones I liked, is the string pattern. On clay, the strings usually stretch out or break after just two hours, and I don’t want a racket that needs restringing every few hours. With the 305S, after five hours of play, the strings still look great, and I believe they’ll last at least another four hours with solid performance.
This is that feeling when you pick up a racket and say: "This is it!"
Why is that so hard to believe? What if I told you he used to train with Borna?200km/hour sure... is it u andy rodick? i didnt know former atp players are chating on tw forums .
Which Vcore are you using, the 95? If so @galapagos and I were talking today so I’ll post a snippet about my Vcore 95 issues that weren’t present in the 305s below (hopefully it helps). In terms of the blade, I found the 18x20 to be vastly superior over the 16x19, so if you’re coming from a background of tighter string patterns I would imagine you would to.Thanks! Interesting noticing your picture now.. Im currently using a vcore and am considering the switch to the 305s (although I will also try the blade)
98 here. Never tried tight string patterns, only 16x19.Which Vcore are you using, the 95? If so @galapagos and I were talking today so I’ll post a snippet about my Vcore 95 issues that weren’t present in the 305s below (hopefully it helps). In terms of the blade, I found the 18x20 to be vastly superior over the 16x19, so if you’re coming from a background of tighter string patterns I would imagine you would to.
“As you can now see, I got the 305s in the end and used it yesterday for the first time. I am planning on putting a full review up in the T-Fight thread but in short its a potential switch from the Vcore 95 - I just need to see if the honeymoon period ends.
I've had a few minor issues with the Vcore 95 that I thought I could solve with lead or by changing strings but after 2 years I still haven't got it how I would like it. I've had three main issues with the Vcore 95:
1. Slices, when out of position or rushed, just sit up, which in doubles results in too many lost points. Generally, the only way I can get slices to penetrate the court with the Vcore 95 is to put my full body behind it, but this is something I can't do on defensive shots.
2. Again on the backhand, the natural rhythm of my OHBH is ever so slightly off, specifically with the racket drop and bringing it through to the contact point. I assume its related to MGR/l (i.e. the push/pull feeling) but no matter how I move weight around, it doesn't feel like the racket naturally wants to comes through to the contact point. Its a really weird feeling, the best way to describe it is that when I initiate the racket drop, the racket almost feels weightless and seems like it doesn't have the momentum to naturally come through to the contact point; which makes me feel like I need to pull it through.
3. Launch angle is too high for me (being used to rackets with 18x20 string patterns and 8 mains in the throat). To be fair, I actually think this is more a byproduct of the aerodynamics/speed of the racket making it feel like I need to adopt a more modern window wiper motion rather than my relatively flat and penetration based stroke that I'm used to.
First outing was nothing but positive all my issues that I mentioned about the Vcore 95 above were solved instantly, and to be honest, I couldn't really fault it. I am being cautious in case its just the 'honeymoon period' but if it continues I will likely switch.”
Slightly stiffer and thicker beam. Imo it would be perfect at 305g/320mm or 310g/315mm but other than that I think 90 % of the amateur players won’t need any more stability than the 305s is now offering. ISO was an overkill. I love it but ye…in terms of general public it was too specific.Inflated reviews on 305S. Come on, how can stability number increase with much lower swing weight compared to outgoing model, everything else being almost identical ? They say wanting more mass, wanting more spin in “dislikes”, but huge ratings wow. Hopefully it doesn’t get into textreme tour 98 category of more scores but less sales… just so overhyped..
outgoing model is way too good with leather grip plus strung at low tension.
There's nothing inflated about it. The previous one wasn't useable for most players with that SW and balance. I'm going to have better stability with the new one if I'm actually able to hit out in front which I couldn't do with the previous one.Inflated reviews on 305S. Come on, how can stability number increase with much lower swing weight compared to outgoing model, everything else being almost identical ? They say wanting more mass, wanting more spin in “dislikes”, but huge ratings wow. Hopefully it doesn’t get into textreme tour 98 category of more scores but less sales… just so overhyped..
outgoing model is way too good with leather grip plus strung at low tension.
Stubborn frenchies think they know best as usual...they actually said everyone loves their grip shape cause they asked, that's why it's same...they must of asked 60+ year old french dudes with one continental grip for everythingSame rectangular grip shape.
It absolutely does, more so than the average consensus on this forum might lead one to believe. From tweeners to pleeners, the 300g 100 16x19 is a go-to for most rec adult males, as well as some females.Seems that this family of rackets (300gr 100" 16*19) suit a lot of different players (being a cx400 tour user myself)
I didnt try the 315 this time. But with the previous version I preferred getting the 300 and weighting it up myself. That way you arent at the mercy of QC and it gives you a ton of flexibility.anyone have any thoughts on how these rackets compare to the babolat pure control tour and blade pro 16 19? And also on whether it's better to weight up the 300 or go for the 315 if you want more handle weight?
Adding on to my last reply. While I don't agree at all with your opinion that the 305s is overhyped, I do think the 300s is getting unsustainable hype. I had posted this previously in another thread:Inflated reviews on 305S. Come on, how can stability number increase with much lower swing weight compared to outgoing model, everything else being almost identical ? They say wanting more mass, wanting more spin in “dislikes”, but huge ratings wow. Hopefully it doesn’t get into textreme tour 98 category of more scores but less sales… just so overhyped..
outgoing model is way too good with leather grip plus strung at low tension.
Im a 300 iso user with 4g at the handle and 2g each at 2&10. Just got my 300s but needs to be strung. Will let you know next week. I played the 305s on demo, its very head light which im not used to anymore. I left some notes above, TLDR not many pros that would make me switch to it.Adding on to my last reply. While I don't agree at all with your opinion that the 305s is overhyped, I do think the 300s is getting unsustainable hype. I had posted this previously in another thread:
"I find it interesting that the TF 300S is getting so much hype and traction in the Tfight thread at the moment. I've played with the ISO300 and RS300 and this one isn't that different. Oak in the new 300S review said he actually prefers the ISO300 model. Not sure why this model is garnering so much attention now. I have a feeling it's a new release thing and once the novelty dies down it will just be the 305S that ends up retaining any of this initial hype."
I have no experience whatsoever with TF but in this thread Ive seen multiple ppl telling about issues with QC in this frame..I tried a friend’s 305s for a hitting session and was pleasantly surprised. I’d never tried a tecnifibre frame before nor a 18x19. Just out of curiosity, in the hierarchy of racquet company QC how does tecnifibre stack up if I was to pick up 2-3 305s at random? Is matching service definitely the way to go?
TF has always had QC issues in the past. That's why I ordered 3 305s from TW this time hoping I'd get 1 that was on spec or maybe 2 that were close to each other. My specs are listed here in an earlier post but I ended up with 2 that were identical to each other and a 3rd one that was pretty similar. They just needed 1-2 g of lead in the hoop to get the SW up to spec so I'm pretty happy. 2 of them I'm running at a SW of 320 and the 3rd I am running at 325SW now so I can experiment.I have no experience whatsoever with TF but in this thread Ive seen multiple ppl telling about issues with QC in this frame..
Ill be buying one with matching service for sure
I prefer the 305S to the Gravity Tour. In fact I just traded/sold my GT98s. They're both great rackets, but the Tec just seems better to me overall. More predictable, more solid, less launchy. Also no whistle!Can anyone compare this to the new Gravity Tour 98? I just bought a Gravity 98 and was wondering if I should take a look at this? Coming from a 2022 Speed MP
How did it go ?I had two demos arrive - the 300 and 300S - and I have to say as others have that the cosmetics are stunning. Not just the white gloss, but the beam design in general, grommets, etc.. Having read enough reviews now, I wish I had skipped the 300 demo (100sq in) and just focused on the 300S and 315S, but excited to give these a go tomorrow night regardless. SWs measured are pretty much on spec.
See, and i disagree with this. Everyone is talking about how special the 305 is. Such a unique racquet etc etc. . But funnily enough, I have now listened to several reviewers that all were saying something along the lines of "Yes, the 305s is a more unique racquet, but if I am honest with myself, I play better with the 300s".Adding on to my last reply. While I don't agree at all with your opinion that the 305s is overhyped, I do think the 300s is getting unsustainable hype. I had posted this previously in another thread:
"I find it interesting that the TF 300S is getting so much hype and traction in the Tfight thread at the moment. I've played with the ISO300 and RS300 and this one isn't that different. Oak in the new 300S review said he actually prefers the ISO300 model. Not sure why this model is garnering so much attention now. I have a feeling it's a new release thing and once the novelty dies down it will just be the 305S that ends up retaining any of this initial hype."
From someone who has used the TFight 305 95, xtc, RS and iso along with the 300 rs and iso (demo’d) and 315 iso: I can look at the specs on paper and say that it seems the only thing that has changed are the 305 specs.See, and i disagree with this. Everyone is talking about how special the 305 is. Such a unique racquet etc etc. . But funnily enough, I have now listened to several reviewers that all were saying something along the lines of "Yes, the 305s is a more unique racquet, but if I am honest with myself, I play better with the 300s".
So yeah, if there is overhype, the 305s is surely on "the list" imo. Maybe the 300s as well, who knows. But I have heard much more hurray about the 305s then the 300s. The 18x19 stringpattern in itself is overhyped imo.
And what I find really disappointing is that almost no one is testing and reviewing the 315s. It seems it is once again the ignored stepchild.
300 98 right?Out in court with the 300 again and continue to find everything about it better than my trusty speed mp. It just feels good.
The one thing I find maybe a bit lacking is out away power on flat shots. I can’t really explain it since both my backhands and serves seem to have gained power compared to the speed, but the flat low finishing shot is just not there as much. Perhaps I just can’t bring the racquet around fast enough, not sure!
Anyone else with similar feeling?
Have you played with any of these frames or are you just blindly questioning the reviews?See, and i disagree with this. Everyone is talking about how special the 305 is. Such a unique racquet etc etc. . But funnily enough, I have now listened to several reviewers that all were saying something along the lines of "Yes, the 305s is a more unique racquet, but if I am honest with myself, I play better with the 300s".
So yeah, if there is overhype, the 305s is surely on "the list" imo. Maybe the 300s as well, who knows. But I have heard much more hurray about the 305s then the 300s. The 18x19 stringpattern in itself is overhyped imo.
And what I find really disappointing is that almost no one is testing and reviewing the 315s. It seems it is once again the ignored stepchild.
If we're honest with ourselves, almost everyone plays better with a pure drive. This doesn't make every non-pure drive overhyped."Yes, the 305s is a more unique racquet, but if I am honest with myself, I play better with the 300s".
16x20 was a popular racket when I was growing up. Several of the current 16x19 lines now (Yonex Ezone XI, vcore tour, dual G, and vcore SV; babolat pure storms, blade steam, ) all had 16x20 patterns. It’s basically what I grew up on with the pure storm and storm tour.If we're honest with ourselves, almost everyone plays better with a pure drive. This doesn't make every non-pure drive overhyped.
The 18x19 point is interesting though, there seems to be a lot of buzz about a string pattern that almost no lines provide as an option. Is it the future of the 18x20 pattern? And if so, why don't more brands go down this route? 16x20 seems to be gaining traction, but 18x19 not so much.
And yet Chris who’s an 18M enthusiast says he chose the 300S over 305? I sometimes can’t buy into reviews some times.TF 305S got the highest score-9/10 in the tenniswarehouse review, TF 300S’s score is 8.3
Chris made the switch from Speed Pro to the TF 100.And yet Chris who’s an 18M enthusiast says he chose the 300S over 305? I sometimes can’t buy into reviews some times.
Interesting.Chris made the switch from Speed Pro to the TF 100.
Not at all surprised to see the opinions that 300/100 is the best fit for most people. Pure drive, Pure aero, Speed MP etc all best sellers for a long time.there are quite a few reviewers on youtube quoting tecnifibre saying they think that the 300/100 is probably the best fit for most people. here's intuitive tennis' impressions
... And the VCore 95D and the Wilson 95 Tour.16x20 was a popular racket when I was growing up. Several of the current 16x19 lines now (Yonex Ezone XI, vcore tour, dual G, and vcore SV; babolat pure storms, blade steam, ) all had 16x20 patterns. It’s basically what I grew up on with the pure storm and storm tour.
18x19 is unique and tougher to use than a 16x20 from my experience. But I think a 98 16x20 or 100 sq in 18x19 would be quite unique.
It’s unfortunate TF didn’t add the 100 as an 18x19. I think that would’ve been a game changer
That 16x20 in the gravity MP is just odd. Main reason why I won’t touch the 16x19 98. String spacing has to be way too open for a control frame.... And the VCore 95D and the Wilson 95 Tour.All amazing racquets! I am not sure how a 16x20 string pattern would play in 98 frame or bigger and if a 18x19 is not the better option in these cases. I personally did not like the Gravity MP with that string pattern. I looked at the string spacing around the sweet zone of the VCore95D (Stan the Man's racquet) and the T-Fight 305 and found out that these are almost identical.
Beckett was saying in his updated GT98 review that the centre of the stringbed is more open than any part of the stringbed on his pure aero rafa. Pretty wild.That 16x20 in the gravity MP is just odd. Main reason why I won’t touch the 16x19 98. String spacing has to be way too open for a control frame.