New Technifibre T-Fight 2025

galapagos

Hall of Fame
If we're honest with ourselves, almost everyone plays better with a pure drive. This doesn't make every non-pure drive overhyped.

The 18x19 point is interesting though, there seems to be a lot of buzz about a string pattern that almost no lines provide as an option. Is it the future of the 18x20 pattern? And if so, why don't more brands go down this route? 16x20 seems to be gaining traction, but 18x19 not so much.
Brands follow money, not necessarily what’s best/better for competitive play. Transition takes time. Currently most of the pro players from top 100 use 16x19. And top players with more alternative “closed” patterns are 16x20 and 18x19. Even Tsitsipas is now saying goodbye to 18x20 I think?
That makes those “alternative” patterns look a bit “normal” to casual buyer where in the past it felt more like an experimental test run ;p
 

TNNSDR

Rookie
Brands follow money, not necessarily what’s best/better for competitive play. Transition takes time. Currently most of the pro players from top 100 use 16x19. And top players with more alternative “closed” patterns are 16x20 and 18x19. Even Tsitsipas is now saying goodbye to 18x20 I think?
That makes those “alternative” patterns look a bit “normal” to casual buyer where in the past it felt more like an experimental test run ;p
Are you sure about Tsitsipas? :) As of yesterday: https://www.abnamro-open.nl/en/news/headlines/52nd-edition/tsitsipas-returns-to-ahoy-as-a-regular We also have a rising young star Henry Bernet (Baby Federer & Wawrinka combined) playing with a customized Blade v9 18x20. There is hope!! ;)
 

galapagos

Hall of Fame
Are you sure about Tsitsipas? :) As of yesterday: https://www.abnamro-open.nl/en/news/headlines/52nd-edition/tsitsipas-returns-to-ahoy-as-a-regular We also have a rising young star Henry Bernet (Baby Federer & Wawrinka combined) playing with a customized Blade v9 18x20. There is hope!! ;)
That’s why I added a question mark :p he was flirting with 16x20 and 18x19. Saying goodbye might take him a little longer after so many years with 18x20. Will he eventually switch? I don’t know, it’s hard because he created all his weapons and game-patterns with 18x20 frame.
but will he win a grand slam with a current setup? Because he is a player that is potentially there to lift the trophy but can he cross the finish line?
Same with Zverev.
18x19 is the closest next step.
Bernet is exciting to watch!
There are levels to this game. What you need to enter top 100, top 50, top 20, top 10 and win GS.
Imo 18x20 users that have grand slam potential but can’t cross the line should follow Djokovic.
 

TNNSDR

Rookie
That’s why I added a question mark :p he was flirting with 16x20 and 18x19. Saying goodbye might take him a little longer after so many years with 18x20. Will he eventually switch? I don’t know, it’s hard because he created all his weapons and game-patterns with 18x20 frame.
but will he win a grand slam with a current setup? Because he is a player that is potentially there to lift the trophy but can he cross the finish line?
Same with Zverev.
18x19 is the closest next step.
Bernet is exciting to watch!
There are levels to this game. What you need to enter top 100, top 50, top 20, top 10 and win GS.
Imo 18x20 users that have grand slam potential but can’t cross the line should follow Djokovic.
100%!! Coming from a 18x20, 18x19 won't harm... Sascha, thicker beam is just the beginning... Now an 18x19 move, listen to us!! Daniil did the same when he moved to Technifibre from the Six.One 95. Talking of Daniil, let's see if he can win more slams with the new coach. The slower balls and surfaces don't favour his play style and I don't think that this will be reversed any soon.
 

Aquaed

New User
I prefer the 305S to the Gravity Tour. In fact I just traded/sold my GT98s. They're both great rackets, but the Tec just seems better to me overall. More predictable, more solid, less launchy. Also no whistle!
If I didn't get the Tec 305S at the same time I got the GT98, I probably would have continued to use the GT98.
But I didn't see the reason to keep both when I would rather reach for the 305S everytime. But if you like the Gravity Tour 98, this is certainly something to look for.

But also keep in mind, I absolutely HATED the Speed MP. That racket was so muted that I hit with it for 10 mins and sold for a good loss to a local college kid.
Could you compare the power levels between them? I would assume the 305S is a bit less powerful because of the 18x19 but it's also stiffer so...?
 

yourtennisfit

Professional
100%!! Coming from a 18x20, 18x19 won't harm... Sascha, thicker beam is just the beginning... Now an 18x19 move, listen to us!! Daniil did the same when he moved to Technifibre from the Six.One 95. Talking of Daniil, let's see if he can win more slams with the new coach. The slower balls and surfaces don't favour his play style and I don't think that this will be reversed any soon.

You are aware though that the number of strings does not mean anything on its own.
e.g. the Gravity Tour 98 and the ProStaff are both 16/19s, but with very different string spacings

So, it doesn't matter what kind of string count you have, it depends on the entire pattern including drilling, progression and spacing
 

TNNSDR

Rookie
O
You are aware though that the number of strings does not mean anything on its own.
e.g. the Gravity Tour 98 and the ProStaff are both 16/19s, but with very different string spacings

So, it doesn't matter what kind of string count you have, it depends on the entire pattern including drilling, progression and spacing
Of course, the spacing is important. One can also use a thicker gauge in a 16x19 pattern (like Sinner does) and reduce the "gaps". Narrower spacing in the middle forces you to hit the ball there or you'll be it trouble. I loved the RF97, VCore 95D and Wilson 95 Tour. Other than these three, 16 mains are a no-go for me. And I tried A LOT of racquets. Just preference / play style I guess.
 

leojramirez

Rookie
300s vs ISO 300 initial impressions. Played a long (too long) set on clay.
I don't play stock, I've tried but 300g is too light for me. Mods with same treatment as my ISO 300, I change the base grip to a babolat syntec pro which adds 3g and makes it feel bigger and better, also 2g lead each at 2&10. Strung at 23.5kg with Toroline experimental (toro toro/enso pro.)

Slightly more power, string bed more responsive. No wild string bed like you would get with a boom pro v1 or vcore 98.
Less twisting, more stable.
Comfort level is similar, no issues there which was my biggest worry.
It feels better on off center shots and the sweet spot gives a different feel, more compact and refined I would say, definitely improved.
Spin and power levels are very good on this racket. The gloss paint is class.
I'd say a worthy update.

300s vs 305s demo stock
More spin and power. Very noticeable for me on serve, even on the warm up I was hitting the net more with the 305s.
I'd say stability similar but I added lead to the 300s as mentioned.
Higher launch angle.
Balance is more towards the head so its easier to bring it around, better for the forehand and serve.
Easier to defend with.
Obviously more control with the 305s.
Felt more comfortable but I think its because the 305s demo came with razor soft I think and I find Toroline strings comfortable.

I play on clay and the key aspect when looking at the 300s vs 305s is spin generation and that comes easier with the 300s so its the easy winner.
 

vndesu

Hall of Fame
Just traded in for a 305s and cannot wait to string it up and play. I previously did use the percept 100d but had to add a ton of weight to it. Hoping the 305s will be a good experience.
 

leojramirez

Rookie
@leojramirez - Unstrung spec on the frames?
300s:
RacketWeightSwingweightBalanceStiffness
1303,128931,969

I don't have a way to measure at home but the 305s strung with overgrip was 328g and 31cm balance using the table and ruler method. My iso 300 and 300s are both 327g and 31.9 strung balanace with og.
 

leojramirez

Rookie
Even with an over grip, that seems a bit more head-light than it should be. Leads me to believe it's a fairly under-spec sample on swing weight.
Yes, thats what I thought when I measured it, I added 2g at 12 to bring it to 31.5 but it felt better without.
 

Falko83

New User
300s vs ISO 300 initial impressions. Played a long (too long) set on clay.
I don't play stock, I've tried but 300g is too light for me. Mods with same treatment as my ISO 300, I change the base grip to a babolat syntec pro which adds 3g and makes it feel bigger and better, also 2g lead each at 2&10. Strung at 23.5kg with Toroline experimental (toro toro/enso pro.)

Slightly more power, string bed more responsive. No wild string bed like you would get with a boom pro v1 or vcore 98.
Less twisting, more stable.
Comfort level is similar, no issues there which was my biggest worry.
It feels better on off center shots and the sweet spot gives a different feel, more compact and refined I would say, definitely improved.
Spin and power levels are very good on this racket. The gloss paint is class.
I'd say a worthy update.

300s vs 305s demo stock
More spin and power. Very noticeable for me on serve, even on the warm up I was hitting the net more with the 305s.
I'd say stability similar but I added lead to the 300s as mentioned.
Higher launch angle.
Balance is more towards the head so its easier to bring it around, better for the forehand and serve.
Easier to defend with.
Obviously more control with the 305s.
Felt more comfortable but I think its because the 305s demo came with razor soft I think and I find Toroline strings comfortable.

I play on clay and the key aspect when looking at the 300s vs 305s is spin generation and that comes easier with the 300s so its the easy winner.

Thanks for the review. This is the kind of review I'm looking for, as I'm a clay courter too, and while I'm currently playing with the 305 ISO and looking into the 305S, the 300S is a frame that intrigues me. I believe the 300S is probably closer to the Ezone 98 than to the VCore 98, right?
 

heavyD

Professional
Just got back from playing with the 305S for a few hours. My specs:

- 31.9 cm balance
- 322 swingweight with no dampener and 16l tour bite soft, 323 with dampener
- 331.7g, or 333.6 with dampener
- definitely preferred dampener on this, though I don't with my blade 18x20 V9's


It is super fun. Also stiff AF; you definitely feel off-center shots and if you totally shank it good luck. But overall it's really quite impressive and plays very light compared to my Blade's. Sweet on the one-handed backhand! More to come.

So confusing as TW gave this racquet an 8.7 for comfort and I don't recall any of the reviewers calling it stiff although I did see TennComm's review where he says if you didn't find last gen comfortable you won't like this one.
 

ChrisJR3264

Hall of Fame
So confusing as TW gave this racquet an 8.7 for comfort and I don't recall any of the reviewers calling it stiff although I did see TennComm's review where he says if you didn't find last gen comfortable you won't like this one.
Every review has mentioned 2025 is stiffer.
TW is trying to sell you on that 63 RA being comfortable.
 

KC!

Hall of Fame
A lot of reviewers used Razor Soft which is on the stiffer side of strings. The demos I had both had Razor Soft. I think it’s a firmer frame & in my opinion would pair better with a softer poly.
 

Vicious49

Legend
So confusing as TW gave this racquet an 8.7 for comfort and I don't recall any of the reviewers calling it stiff although I did see TennComm's review where he says if you didn't find last gen comfortable you won't like this one.
It is a stiff frame but it could be the foam filling adding to the comfort level. I love the feel on impact. It has a nice soft thud to it. No hollowness or jarring. That doesn't mean that the vibration from the stiffness isn't still being translated to my arms and I won't feel it down the road. But just hitting it, it feels comfortable to me.
 

andrewc

Rookie
I know this is a T Fight thread but any reason the Speed MP isn't on the list if you're just wanting more power / 16x19 out of the speed pro?
I tried the Speed MP, Strike 100 and Blade 100 and I don't like all 3, I can't understand them, I don't really know how to describe them, they do not do anything great, they are just ok in most departments. Personally I like either Pure Drives or 98in racquets because if I give up power I want better manoeuvrability and better control which none of those 3 doesn't fell that they give enough of.
 

ulunxtns

Professional
Indeed, also ACtennis says this one feels stiffer than previous gen.
It gave me arm pain after I played, I posted that earlier, but most people here said it was comfortable enough. To me, it's the same stiffness category as PA98.

Aside from the playability, the stiffness was a concern for me to commit to it long-term. I own ISO 305 too, I'd say ISO is slightly more arm friendly than the new one.
 

leojramirez

Rookie
Thanks for the review. This is the kind of review I'm looking for, as I'm a clay courter too, and while I'm currently playing with the 305 ISO and looking into the 305S, the 300S is a frame that intrigues me. I believe the 300S is probably closer to the Ezone 98 than to the VCore 98, right?
I played the '19, '21 and '23 vcores, '23, comfort wise the 23 vcore was better than the previous 2 but it gave me TE.
Since then I was on a search, could only play the vcore pro because of how soft it was but when TE got better i played extensively with the boom pro, blade 100 and the ISO 300. Also tried the blade 98, shift, tempo iga, rf01, aero 98. Only hit with the ezone 98 and 100 for like 2 minutes so can't really compare to that. The 300s is definitely more stable than the vcores, responsive but more tamed string bed. Spin maybe a bit more for the vcore.
When demoing the ISOs i liked the 315 the best but I'm of the opinion that its best to buy lower static and customise.
 

leojramirez

Rookie
It gave me arm pain after I played, I posted that earlier, but most people here said it was comfortable enough. To me, it's the same stiffness category as PA98.

Aside from the playability, the stiffness was a concern for me to commit to it long-term. I own ISO 305 too, I'd say ISO is slightly more arm friendly than the new one.
I've felt my forearm with the ISO 300 depending on the strings with razor soft freshly strung being one of them but hasn't been the case with Toroline and tour m8.
I tried the PA98 extensively with o-toro and confidential 1.2 at 22kg and it still felt harsh outside the sweet spot. I've got a healthy wrist but would feel discomfort on my wrist and forearm when hitting late or framing the ball. It was too launchy for me anyway.
 

TNNSDR

Rookie
It gave me arm pain after I played, I posted that earlier, but most people here said it was comfortable enough. To me, it's the same stiffness category as PA98.

Aside from the playability, the stiffness was a concern for me to commit to it long-term. I own ISO 305 too, I'd say ISO is slightly more arm friendly than the new one.
Yes, I can confirm that for the 305s feels stiffer than the 305 ISO!! One of the reasons for not switching.
 

ChrisJR3264

Hall of Fame
I’ve hit in a practice session side by side of razor soft and razor code last summer.

Razor soft does feel more plush with less vibrations. But is it truly “softer” than other brands that have a soft poly? I don’t know. I know have a hard time with the playability of balls launching after a 4-5 hours of play.
 

vndesu

Hall of Fame
Hoping weather is good for tomorrow for me. Strung up my 305s with razor code soft 17g at 54 and after adding leather and grip, the total static weight of the racket is about 332g.
 

Laolao

New User
Hi everyone,

First post here, these are my impressions of the TFight 315s, positive overall. I previoulsy liked their TF40 line a lot more than the TFight line. This is less the case.
Tested with Razor Soft strings. Played 3 x 1h on clay.

Some background
Older 4.0 player dealing with shoulder issues. Previously used Pro Staff 97 until shoulder issues arose. Now playing with Pure Strike 98 16x19 and Blade v8 16x19. But not really convinced by either. I have a weak 2HBH with PS98 and have issues with higher launch angle from the Blade, struggling to keep the ball in on forehands.

The TFight 315s impressions:
  • Similar overall vibe to TF40 315 18x20 and Wilson 6.1 95 18x20 (the glossy paint may be ?)
  • Surprisingly low launch angle compared to other 16x19 racquets
  • Excellent weight distribution for generating head speed, it gives an old school feeling to the racket
  • Balanced power between forehand and backhand, the weight evens out my imbalance
Strengths
  • Rock-solid preparation
  • Snappy hit response
  • Controllable power
  • Strong volleys
  • Comfortable serving despite shoulder issues
Limitations
  • Slightly unstable after hit
  • Less responsive on unexpected fast shots and semi-volleys. No last second change in direction possible.
  • Requires more effort on approach shots, especially vs a PS97
  • Sometimes not finding enough depth (or worse, finding the net)
Comfort Level
Softer than Pure Strike but stiffer than the Blade. Ideal for one-hour hitting sessions in my case, but might be too much for more… Stiffness is there but it is really well contained.

Loved the old school “make the weight work for you” kind of feeling. While an excellent racquet with strong performance characteristics, its weight and demands might be challenging. A easier string might solve some of these issues though.
Next, the 305s this week...
 

dioguml

New User
Hi everyone,

First post here, these are my impressions of the TFight 315s, positive overall. I previoulsy liked their TF40 line a lot more than the TFight line. This is less the case.
Tested with Razor Soft strings. Played 3 x 1h on clay.

Some background
Older 4.0 player dealing with shoulder issues. Previously used Pro Staff 97 until shoulder issues arose. Now playing with Pure Strike 98 16x19 and Blade v8 16x19. But not really convinced by either. I have a weak 2HBH with PS98 and have issues with higher launch angle from the Blade, struggling to keep the ball in on forehands.

The TFight 315s impressions:
  • Similar overall vibe to TF40 315 18x20 and Wilson 6.1 95 18x20 (the glossy paint may be ?)
  • Surprisingly low launch angle compared to other 16x19 racquets
  • Excellent weight distribution for generating head speed, it gives an old school feeling to the racket
  • Balanced power between forehand and backhand, the weight evens out my imbalance
Strengths
  • Rock-solid preparation
  • Snappy hit response
  • Controllable power
  • Strong volleys
  • Comfortable serving despite shoulder issues
Limitations
  • Slightly unstable after hit
  • Less responsive on unexpected fast shots and semi-volleys. No last second change in direction possible.
  • Requires more effort on approach shots, especially vs a PS97
  • Sometimes not finding enough depth (or worse, finding the net)
Comfort Level
Softer than Pure Strike but stiffer than the Blade. Ideal for one-hour hitting sessions in my case, but might be too much for more… Stiffness is there but it is really well contained.

Loved the old school “make the weight work for you” kind of feeling. While an excellent racquet with strong performance characteristics, its weight and demands might be challenging. A easier string might solve some of these issues though.
Next, the 305s this week...
Keep us posted about the 305s
 

Trip

Legend
Limitations
  • Less responsive on unexpected fast shots and semi-volleys. No last second change in direction possible.
  • Requires more effort on approach shots, especially vs a PS97
  • Sometimes not finding enough depth (or worse, finding the net)
[...] Loved the old school “make the weight work for you” kind of feeling. While an excellent racquet with strong performance characteristics, its weight and demands might be challenging. A easier string might solve some of these issues though.
Sounds like you'd be ripe for a lighter stock static weight (300-305g). I think you'll find the 305S a better fit, provided you can make the lower launch work. Otherwise, the 300S, plus a bit of customization.
 

jguttentag

New User
Have two separate back ordered demo requests for the 305s. Looking at the reviews I am really excited to try. Currently using a Percept 97D and was using the EZT before that. From all the reviews it seems like the 305s could be a perfect blend of the two. It would be nice to have the stability and control everyone has been saying the racket has with lower swing weight.
 

Cayenne321

New User
Mine spent a week at the stringer but it's hopefully only a couple more days in the post...

Busted out the old TGT 293.1 last night to re-familiarise myself with the rectangle grip. I used to love it, but going back I can see why people struggle / don't like it. Definitely going to need an adjustment period.
 

hdjs94

New User
What are ya'll generally stringing this racquet with?
I've used 16x19 my whole life with stiff poly's (tour bite, sync, etc) around 52/50lb at around 1.25 gauge.

I'm wondering if I need to adjust for the 305s 18x 19 pattern with a lower tension and by how much and/or if I need to switch to a smaller gauge around 1.20...

I have no elbow or arm issues at all and love the crisp connected feel of strings like tour bite, S7T, sync, and so on.

First had the racket with tour bite 16l at 53 lb and it felt too boardy. Then tried the racket with Restring zero main at 52lb and Toroline Enso pro at 50lb just for the blue/red color combo and that was not a good idea as it was just too muted for my taste after 2 hours of hitting.
 

FoldingChair

Semi-Pro
I bought a 305s after hitting with a friends for a bit. 305g dead on without strings and no plastic on grip, 293.8 swing weight unstrung, couldn’t tell ya twist weight. Had my first hit strung with Toroline Wasabi x Toroline snapper at 46/44. Some thoughts while fresh on the mind: no arm pain at all. Not a big fan of the string combo I chose, will try some grapple snake tour sniper and maybe drop a bit. Return of serve is extraordinary. I was stepping into serves and RIPPING returns. It swings very quick yet plows its way through groundies, is that called stability or something? Too many technical terms. Anyways, it helped a lot on volleys. I didn’t find it as easy to hit drop shots as my speed mp but to be fair I’ve had that racquet for like 3 years and this one for 4 hours. I just need more time with it. Serves didn’t have as much pace as my speed mp but man I can place them much better with much more spin/bite. I’m enjoying the ride so far, gotta find the perfect string setup for it. Not really thinking about adding lead or anything at this point. That’s what I can recall atm. Thanks for reading my crappy ted talk
 
First hit with my 300s demo today. Stock SW was only 315, so I added some tape at 10/2 to get it up to 327. With that setup, this thing serves absolute bombs. Something about the grip shape seems to set my hand in the right position to really tee off on serve, and it’s so easy to serve with power and spin in whatever proportions you want.

Also, I’ll repeat what I said earlier about the 305s about these new Technifibre frames swinging easier/lighter than the specs would suggest (in a good way, once you get used to it). I noticed it with the 300s too. Not sure what element of the frame geometry might be causing that.
 

Laolao

New User
First impressions after hitting 1 hour with the 305s (stringed with Razor Soft).

Initial impressions were mixed—the string bed felt overly "stern". But I have to admit that I played the best tennis I've played in months. This thing is aggressive.

Strengths
  • Launch angle: higer than the 315s? Achieved better consistency in depth
  • Spin access: good, no problem on this front
  • Maneuverability: quicker than the 315s. Last-second directional changes possible
  • Precision: effortlessly found corners
  • Pace: you can really outpace your opponent with this racket.
Weaknesses
  • Volleys: less confidence compared to the 315s
  • Serve power: slightly diminished versus the 315s
  • Comfort: potential dealbreaker. Shoulder is definitely heating up. A softer poly might help
The 315s blend old-school stability with modern tweaks, while the 305s scream "new school" to me. My younger self would’ve loved this racket. But comfort might be an issue here.
 
Last edited:
First hit with my 300s demo today. Stock SW was only 315, so I added some tape at 10/2 to get it up to 327. With that setup, this thing serves absolute bombs. Something about the grip shape seems to set my hand in the right position to really tee off on serve, and it’s so easy to serve with power and spin in whatever proportions you want.

Also, I’ll repeat what I said earlier about the 305s about these new Technifibre frames swinging easier/lighter than the specs would suggest (in a good way, once you get used to it). I noticed it with the 300s too. Not sure what element of the frame geometry might be causing that.
Whould you mind to draw a comparison from your experience with both frames?
 

leojramirez

Rookie
300s vs ISO 300 initial impressions. Played a long (too long) set on clay.
I don't play stock, I've tried but 300g is too light for me. Mods with same treatment as my ISO 300, I change the base grip to a babolat syntec pro which adds 3g and makes it feel bigger and better, also 2g lead each at 2&10. Strung at 23.5kg with Toroline experimental (toro toro/enso pro.)

Slightly more power, string bed more responsive. No wild string bed like you would get with a boom pro v1 or vcore 98.
Less twisting, more stable.
Comfort level is similar, no issues there which was my biggest worry.
It feels better on off center shots and the sweet spot gives a different feel, more compact and refined I would say, definitely improved.
Spin and power levels are very good on this racket. The gloss paint is class.
I'd say a worthy update.
Another session with the 300s. 1 hour control exercises, cross, down the line, etc. and 1 set.
I removed 1g from 3&9. For some reason I find it easier to move on the serve and the stability helps on my one hander down the line, its been such a long time I've been struggling with that shot. Easier to find cross court angles as its easier to move. More power still applies. Definitely and improvement over the ISO 300.
 

andrewc

Rookie
One mans trash another mans treasure. I though 305s was boardy and cheap feeling. If one desired firmer response both Wilson and Yonex are doing a better job.
This is what I love about tennis racquets, that no matter what anyone recommends or tells you about a racquet you might find it the complete opposite.
 
Top