New Technifibre T-Fight 2025

[Laolao]

Thanks. I also want to try out the 305s so that’s good input. If the launch angle is significantly lower than the pure strike, it probably won’t work for me. But the feel and improved maneuverability does seem enticing

300s sounds like a better fit.

In the end, I have to try it out myself.

Coming from a PS 98 16x19, I had more troubles to adapt to the launch angle of the 300s and the 315s for some reason. The 305s was fine. Indeed, you have to try it yourself.

So after testing the 315s, the 305s, the 300, we are now down to the 300s.

Test play TFight 300s

Overall, it took me a few shots to adapt to this frame, it is very close to the 305s and 300. As mentionned above, I struggled with the launch angle with this frame, and I did play some short shots (like the 315s). It was my first hour with the 300s, but managed to get the lead on a 4.5 who I usually struggle to beat. The manoeuvrability on this frame is amazing, and having the option to change direction at the last second is very useful, you can really outpace and surprise your opponent.

Strengths

• Serve is a joy with all these frames, 300s is almost on par with the 305s : 305s = 300s > 315s = 300
• Comfort level is even better than the 300, it has less vibrations, it is also less boardy than the 305s : 300s > 300 = 315s > 305s
• Volleying is really fun with all these frames, it is fast and still stable. The 300 was really the most fun on volleys : 300 > 300s = 305s > 315s
• Returning is great, I did not miss a single return on 3 returning games. I can't compare to other frames since I played widely different players in terms of service.
• Ground strokes are in line with the rest of the frames, but even though it is stable, there is a feeling of instability. The 315s doesn't have that feeling. 315s > 305s > 300s = 300
• Defense - offense transition are a joy with all the line. This is a big plus for my style of play. 300 = 300s = 305s > 315s

Weaknesses

• Like the 315s, some occasional short balls. There is more consistency on the 305s and more forgiveness on the 300.
• the topspin ability of the 300 is limited but it helped to keep the ball in on my forehand. I missed this ability on this frame.

It will be very difficult to make a choice, I could play with all these frames. Overall, I like the multi-dimensional quality of this line vs the Pure Strike I am currently playing with. As age is taking its toll, I need something to finish the point early and I feel that one of these would help a lot.

 

[galapagos]

Did you ever get to compare these frames?

My review is up online! But in short:
Tfight 300s to me is like a tempo on steroids haha. I like tempo more. Suits my grinding playstyle a bit better. No issues with comfort but you feel the ball harder for sure.
I would say more a difference in feel preference rather than comfort preference but some might be more sensitive. (About tempo)
Tfight 300s was a bit stiffer and more responsive in feel to me (less comfort here imo)

 

[jguttentag]

Got my back ordered demos in and the QC is not great. I don’t have a scale but the demo I received from TW is a lot heavier than the racket I bought. This is with no overgrip too. Most of the weight seems to be in the head too.

 

[EggSalad]

This might be a dumb question but are those black grommets the equivalent of what Wilson has done with the snap and go grommet replacement system?

 

[smithie]

@dr. godmode are you still playing with the 300/305, and if so any updates?

 

[dr. godmode]

@dr. godmode are you still playing with the 300/305, and if so any updates?

I put the Solinco 10JX proto in the 300S the other day and it’s quite nice. Luca is borrowing my 305S for his review so I haven’t hit it recently. Not updates in customization cuz I’ve been dialing in the SX300T and EZ98 for the reviews which we are shooting rn.

 

[hdjs94]

I put the Solinco 10JX proto in the 300S the other day and it’s quite nice. Luca is borrowing my 305S for his review so I haven’t hit it recently. Not updates in customization cuz I’ve been dialing in the SX300T and EZ98 for the reviews which we are shooting rn.

Highly looking forward to Luca's take on the 305s!!!!

 

[ohplease]

This might be a dumb question but are those black grommets the equivalent of what Wilson has done with the snap and go grommet replacement system?

It looks like the wilson thing is sort of like what you see on the volkl v1s, where you have grommet strips as a separate piece from the bumper guard as opposed to integrated into the bumper guard itself. Tecnifibre tie off eyelets are a separate thing where the corresponding grommet comes in part way from the strip on the outside of the frame, then the eyelets are inserted from the inside of the frame and the two nest together inside the beam.

I haven't used the wilson system but I have used the volkl one and while the volkl one is much, much better than a one piece bumper guard, the tecnifibre system is INFINITELY easier to deal with than either - especially if you want to put weight under a bumper guard and then get that used bumper guard back on the frame as your tie off grommets are going to be a mess and tough to get threaded through again (you might be able to do it but let's be real it sucks to do and if you can't do it you need a whole new bumper). With the tecnifibre system - not only are the separate inner eyelets not going to be a mess, they don't have to be threaded through in the first place

 

[dioguml]

If I had to pick between 305s and GT98, it’s GT98 and it’s not particularly close. This may have the hype, but since comfort comes at a premium to you (also myself), not worth the effort to try and force yourself into liking this one. I’ll say it again, it performs exceptional on groundies and serve, but leaves a lot to be desired for me as an all courter

Hi! Could you develop a bit more the comparison? I was certain about giving the GT98 a go but then I saw many reviews saying its not a control racquet, a bit unpredictable.. Whereas the tfight 305s seems to be the perfect stick to many..

Comfort also have a big weighting in my decision, I currently play with a vcore 100 weighted up a bit and was looking for more control.. Tried a blade 98 v9 but found it too demanding even though control was great.. Still think I play better all around with my vcore …

 

[Cayenne321]

So I absolutely loved this racquet (305s)a week ago playing on grass, but this week back on the hardcourts I found a new struggle. One that is a bit of a hot topic atm... Balls. I don't know how often you guys use fresh balls, but the ones that are already a set or two old and have lost a lot of fur made me hate life.

New balls = amazing frame
Fluffed up slow balls = still amazing, can punch through the slowness
Older furless balls = rocket launcher, really noticed the lack of touch

 

[gino]

Hi! Could you develop a bit more the comparison? I was certain about giving the GT98 a go but then I saw many reviews saying its not a control racquet, a bit unpredictable.. Whereas the tfight 305s seems to be the perfect stick to many..

Comfort also have a big weighting in my decision, I currently play with a vcore 100 weighted up a bit and was looking for more control.. Tried a blade 98 v9 but found it too demanding even though control was great.. Still think I play better all around with my vcore …

I’d give you a more comprehensive breakdown through a post here but it feels like my thoughts are better encapsulated by my 305s vid and GT98 vid on YT. For me, the 305s isn’t a modern crispy response 98 on contact (think PA98, PD98, pure strike, VC98, EZ98) wherte there’s a lot of filtering happening to combat the high RA, it’s pretty raw/direct stiffness

The GT98 is another world of comfort relative to those sticks, closest comparable layups for me are the PT57A and nCode pro staff. I really like it, although I thought the sound/sonic stuff was overrated/overblown. If anything, I think the 305s sounds cooler/lounder/low freq… Personally I’m not a 305s guy, but I also played the best tennis of my life with a speed ig which is the gravity pro mold / similar beam design. That makes me pretty biased when it comes to the GT98 wide beam design, I’ll admit that straight up

 

[gino]

So I absolutely loved this racquet (305s)a week ago playing on grass, but this week back on the hardcourts I found a new struggle. One that is a bit of a hot topic atm... Balls. I don't know how often you guys use fresh balls, but the ones that are already a set or two old and have lost a lot of fur made me hate life.

New balls = amazing frame
Fluffed up slow balls = still amazing, can punch through the slowness
Older furless balls = rocket launcher, really noticed the lack of touch

Interesting you presumably had more time to prepare on hard courts but liked it less. It’s very stable, so I could see it performing well on half swing groundies/slices/chips on grass. I did find it a bit launchy on hard/outdoor carpet, but nothing like the 300s

 

[dioguml]

I’d give you a more comprehensive breakdown through a post here but it feels like my thoughts are better encapsulated by my 305s vid and GT98 vid on YT. For me, the 305s isn’t a modern crispy response 98 on contact (think PA98, PD98, pure strike, VC98, EZ98) wherte there’s a lot of filtering happening to combat the high RA, it’s pretty raw/direct stiffness

The GT98 is another world of comfort relative to those sticks, closest comparable layups for me are the PT57A and nCode pro staff. I really like it, although I thought the sound/sonic stuff was overrated/overblown. If anything, I think the 305s sounds cooler/lounder/low freq… Personally I’m not a 305s guy, but I also played the best tennis of my life with a speed ig which is the gravity pro mold / similar beam design. That makes me pretty biased when it comes to the GT98 wide beam design, I’ll admit that straight up

Thanks will check the vids, didnt know you were a reviewer.. Will give feedback on youtube for algos.. Cheers

 

[hdjs94]

Hi! Could you develop a bit more the comparison? I was certain about giving the GT98 a go but then I saw many reviews saying its not a control racquet, a bit unpredictable.. Whereas the tfight 305s seems to be the perfect stick to many..

Comfort also have a big weighting in my decision, I currently play with a vcore 100 weighted up a bit and was looking for more control.. Tried a blade 98 v9 but found it too demanding even though control was great.. Still think I play better all around with my vcore …

I have both racquets.
The tfight is more traditionally controlled with a tighter string pattern than the GT 98. While I think the GT has less control than the 305s, the GT still has slightly above average control compared to the rest of the market if you play with a decent amount of spin and proper full swing probably around a 4.0+ level.

As for comfort, the GT is significantly more comfortable than the 305s.

If you found the 98 blade too demanding, not sure if the GT or 305s is going to be much different compared to the VCORE 100.

 

[dioguml]

I have both racquets.
The tfight is more traditionally controlled with a tighter string pattern than the GT 98. While I think the GT has less control than the 305s, the GT still has slightly above average control compared to the rest of the market if you play with a decent amount of spin and proper full swing probably around a 4.0+ level.

As for comfort, the GT is significantly more comfortable than the 305s.

If you found the 98 blade too demanding, not sure if the GT or 305s is going to be much different compared to the VCORE 100.

You mean the GT not much different from the Blade? From the reviews I would assume it has a bit more free power..

The Blade I felt super confident swinging out all the time but in the end, after 1 and a 1/2 hour my arm was a bit sore.. Very little but not something Id risk.. could be the string as well, my first time trying Lynx Tour.. I use poly tour strike on my vcore..

 

[hdjs94]

You mean the GT not much different from the Blade? From the reviews I would assume it has a bit more free power..

The Blade I felt super confident swinging out all the time but in the end, after 1 and a 1/2 hour my arm was a bit sore.. Very little but not something Id risk.. could be the string as well, my first time trying Lynx Tour.. I use poly tour strike on my vcore..

Ah yes, the GT does have more power than the blade for sure.

I’m assuming your arm felt sore with the blade because of the comfort and not the weight, etc? The GT definitely has a very unique feel so highly recommend trying it out for yourself. Not sure if I would say it’s necessarily more or less comfortable than a blade because the blade is a pretty muted racquet imo. The 305s definitely would not be good for you if you found the blade uncomfortable. The Lynx tour might definitely be the culprit as its a pretty stiff/ uncomfortable leaning string in comparison to the rest.

 

[dioguml]

Ah yes, the GT does have more power than the blade for sure.

I’m assuming your arm felt sore with the blade because of the comfort and not the weight, etc? The GT definitely has a very unique feel so highly recommend trying it out for yourself. Not sure if I would say it’s necessarily more or less comfortable than a blade because the blade is a pretty muted racquet imo. The 305s definitely would not be good for you if you found the blade uncomfortable. The Lynx tour might definitely be the culprit as its a pretty stiff/ uncomfortable leaning string in comparison to the rest.

Not the weight, my vcore has a leather grip so weight is pretty close if not above that of the Blade.. Discomfort might have come from strings or slightly smaller grip size (L2, I use L3, i added an extra OG to compensate)..

But I do feel I had to put more effort into strokes with the blade than I am used to with the vcore..

Might try the GT then.. This thread was already giving me second thoughts regarding 305s stiffness even though most ppl didnt say it was uncomfortable

 

[hdjs94]

Not the weight, my vcore has a leather grip so weight is pretty close if not above that of the Blade.. Discomfort might have come from strings or slightly smaller grip size (L2, I use L3, i added an extra OG to compensate)..

But I do feel I had to put more effort into strokes with the blade than I am used to with the vcore..

Might try the GT then.. This thread was already giving me second thoughts regarding 305s stiffness even though most ppl didnt say it was uncomfortable

Ah I got you. Yea I would probably think it's the strings then. I agree that the GT might be the best option for now!

 

[borgpro]

Played with the 315 grams version last weekend that a friend brought with him (test racket) and we both thought it was surprisingly unstable, the hoop flutters… nice feel hitting the sweet spot, but overal the racket disappointed us both.
We are both used to heavy players frames in the past (330 and 340 grams pro staffs for example).
We liked the ezone 98 (2025) much better that I recently bought. With a lower weight and swing weight, and lower RA, it is still much more stable, for sure.
That surprised me!

 

[gino]

Thanks will check the vids, didnt know you were a reviewer.. Will give feedback on youtube for algos.. Cheers

Thanks man appreciate you. Let me know if there’s any area you’re still confused on

 

[patrickluvsoj]

Played a 3 setter with the 300 today, and enjoyed it more than I expected! For reference I usually play ezone 98+

Very maneuverable so you get tons of racket head speed, and therefore spin. Power does not seem excessive and control seemed pretty good. I felt I can hit flat shots decently well.

As I got tired and the balls fluffed up, it felt hard to get court penetration. Maybe due to mass?

Still want to try the 300s and 305s to which one I end up preferring.

 

[Cayenne321]

Interesting you presumably had more time to prepare on hard courts but liked it less. It’s very stable, so I could see it performing well on half swing groundies/slices/chips on grass. I did find it a bit launchy on hard/outdoor carpet, but nothing like the 300s

Honestly it was only once the balls lost their fur, which is something that would exacerbate launchiness on any frame. Balls losing their fur just happens to be something that is getting worse lately and we're too cheap to change balls frequently enough to keep up.

 

[gino]

Honestly it was only once the balls lost their fur, which is something that would exacerbate launchiness on any frame. Balls losing their fur just happens to be something that is getting worse lately and we're too cheap to change balls frequently enough to keep up.

thats fair. I thought the 305s had a really nice controlled bed, so a bit surprising you felt that way

balls and their lack of integrity continues to wear on the sport from the rec to elite pro levels, what a serious shame. if we all need rotator cuff surgery in 10 years we should class action lawsuit all the ball companies lol

 

[Cayenne321]

thats fair. I thought the 305s had a really nice controlled bed, so a bit surprising you felt that way

Launchiness is probably the wrong word actually, more like unable to get enough spin to control the punchy power with my usual strokes when the fur is worn down, so balls are sailing on me. Spin is no issue at all when the balls are fresh and they dip in nicely with good depth.

 

[hdjs94]

Luca with that 305s review!

 

[dioguml]

Luca with that 305s review!

Whyyy.. People always make you wonder “what if” hahahaha

 

[z00]

Are there any actual differences in 305S playability from outgoing TF ISO 305 assuming the SW is comparable (see my sig)? I have 3 TF ISOs 305 SW strung in 320-325 range.

How come TW lists 305s stiffness at 63, but above video at 66?

 

[Cayenne321]

How come TW lists 305s stiffness at 63, but above video at 66?

TW lists strung stiffness averaged over a batch

 

[tomato123]

Has anyone yet to venture out and confirm what is, or is not, inside the handle for the 305S? For the purpose of potentially replacing the buttcap and having the freedom to add weight to the handle, but if it is foam filled, it seems that would kind of defeat the purpose.

 

[esm]

Luca with that 305s review!

I just can not take my eyes away from those smiley/wonky strings, on both the ISO305 and the 305s.
Can’t be that serious on the racquet(s) if the strings aren’t adjusted after strings….. lol

 

[Addxyz]

I played with a 300S today, first time out. Gut mains and poly crosses, and I actually don’t find it harsh at all. I do think the critiques about it being too crisp are very string dependent.
Also, mine has a 317 swingweight, and somehow despite a relatively low SW, it’s still really stable. Really nice combination of maneuverability and stability.

That 300s is a magic stick. For something being so light and low on swing weight, it is crazy stable. I had a fun time hitting with it. The harder I swung, the better it became. It's not a spin stick like the GT98, but it has a sufficient amount of spin and power. Gut / poly is great in this racquet. I actually have the 305s and I'm not quite sure which I prefer. However, for ease of use, the 300s should be the choice for most people.

 

[Addxyz]

Are you able to compare it with frames you are familiar with in terms of control, power, spin and launch angle? Bonus points if it’s an ezone 98 or pure strike 98 16x19!

300s has more spin and power than then EZ98.

EZ98 is muted, 300s is crisp. I thought the EZ98 was an easy to use frame, but I'm finding the 300s to be way easier to use.

 

[Trip]

I actually have the 305s and I'm not quite sure which I prefer. However, for ease of use, the 300s should be the choice for most people.

One potential issue with the 305S is that many rec players may string it too high in tension with too firm and/or thick a poly to really get the most out of the string bed, which, in order to have enough open-ness, pocketing, trampoline and snapback, really needs a certain amount of thin-ness, softness and/or low tension, to allow that to happen. An important factor in comparing the 305S to the 300S, or most any other 16-main 98.

 

[_FrankTheTank_]

Had a few Sessions with the 300s now.
287 SW (added 1g total at 10/2, was 285sw stock) unstrung
31.7cm unstrung
302g unstrung
strung with MSV focus hex soft 1.25 at 23/22kg.

So far I'm not too much impressed. Not a bad frame, stable for it's weight. responsive string bed, power on tap (easy power, not sure about top end power), spin is not given you for free as it's not a spin frame per se, but if you do the mechanics to access it, it gives you plenty, kind of the CX200 2024 (those frames have in general not much in common beside the open spaced 16x19). that said, you need to play with spin to tame and control the power which can get erratic when hitting to flat and not loose enough in the arm. although mine is more HL than target specs, I don't found it to be whippy. Very direct frame. Directional control isn't top notch (which isn't neccessary and isn't supposed to be) but it's more than enough. Will customize it mor HL to get better directional control and compensate the direct response (not much pocketing/dwell).

Slices can be (as on the ISO 300) a bit erractic. Not sure if a round string will help with that.
Will add 5 ore more gram to the handle and test again.

 

[ChrisJR3264]

One potential issue with the 305S is that many rec players may string it too high in tension with too firm and/or thick a poly to really get the most out of the string bed, which, in order to have enough open-ness, pocketing, trampoline and snapback, really needs a certain amount of thin-ness, softness and/or low tension, to allow that to happen. An important factor in comparing the 305S to the 300S, or most any other 16-main 98.

This is where I feel I’m going to “move on” from the tfight even after the play test: stringing it too high - what’s considered too high?
I’m excited to try this bad boy and write a thorough review.
But lately I’ve been gravitating to the gravity

 

[Trip]

although mine is more HL than target specs, I don't found it to be whippy.

You can attribute a good portion of that to the 15.4 stock twist weight. These climbing TW's are theoretically great for all that stock lateral stability, but there's an upper bounds on how easy it is to swivel the racquet face as a result, which certainly can impact the feeling of whippyness, especially on any stroke where the wrist/hand is more highly leveraged.

This is where I feel I’m going to “move on” from the tfight even after the play test: stringing it too high - what’s considered too high?

Generally any higher than the DT you're used to on a 16-main frame of similar head size, minus a bit, to compensate for the additional lack of free bite/pocketing/pop. Much above that, and there's a decent chance you're stringing too high.

 

[ChrisJR3264]

You can attribute a good portion of that to the 15.4 stock twist weight. These climbing TW's are theoretically great for all that stock lateral stability, but there's an upper bounds on how easy it is to swivel the racquet face as a result, which certainly can impact the feeling of whippyness, especially on any stroke where the wrist/hand is more highly leveraged.


Generally any higher than the DT you're used to on a 16-main frame of similar head size, minus a bit, to compensate for the additional lack of free bite/pocketing/pop. Much above that, and there's a decent chance you're stringing too high.

52-54 lbs or else they’re not “Chrispy”

 

[Trip]

52-54 lbs or else they’re not “Chrispy”

For a 98" 18x19 with a stock unstrung SW of 290-ish to low 290's, the only thing I'd string 52-54 lbs is probably a full bed of firm synthetic, maybe the softest/most explosive hybrids or synthetic/poly fusion strings. For full bed poly though, unless we're talking very thin gauges (<=1.15 or so) and/or the absolute softest stuff, I would think 50ish would be just about as high as you'd want to go.

Now, if you plan on spec'ing up higher SW, then I could see moving up in tension, to help counteract/control the extra bludgeoning force. But in stock form on the the 305S (a presumably on-spec one at least), I'd stick with my above plan. At least for starters.

 

[_FrankTheTank_]

You can attribute a good portion of that to the 15.4 stock twist weight. These climbing TW's are theoretically great for all that stock lateral stability, but there's an upper bounds on how easy it is to swivel the racquet face as a result, which certainly can impact the feeling of whippyness, especially on any stroke where the wrist/hand is more highly leveraged.

You're propably right. Might move the weight (although it's not much) up to 12 o'clock.

 

[ChrisJR3264]

You're propably right. Might move the weight (although it's not much) up to 12 o'clock.

I think the way TF constructed this racket was fantastic. It basically tells you with the wider beam at 3 and 9 - add weight to 12 and you should be good to go.

 

[Addxyz]

One potential issue with the 305S is that many rec players may string it too high in tension with too firm and/or thick a poly to really get the most out of the string bed, which, in order to have enough open-ness, pocketing, trampoline and snapback, really needs a certain amount of thin-ness, softness and/or low tension, to allow that to happen. An important factor in comparing the 305S to the 300S, or most any other 16-main 98.

For reference, the 300s was strung with gut / ghostwire at 53/53#. My 305s was strung with Tru Pro Pure Rush 1.18 / Max Power Rough 1.20 at 45/43. Both string beds were fantastic.

 

[Trip]

For reference, the 300s was strung with gut / ghostwire at 53/53#. My 305s was strung with Tru Pro Pure Rush 1.18 / Max Power Rough 1.20 at 45/43. Both string beds were fantastic.

Couldn't have crafted a better example if I made one up. 300s with a hybrid in the mid-50's. 305s with full bed medium‐soft/medium-firm poly in the low-mid 40's. And enjoyed them both. There you go.

 

[Roca]

I'm thinking about trying the new T-fights. Currently using the T40-305 18*20 and I really like it. What would be a good option if I want a similar option with maybe a little bit more of power?

 

[FoldingChair]

I'm thinking about trying the new T-fights. Currently using the T40-305 18*20 and I really like it. What would be a good option if I want a similar option with maybe a little bit more of power?

I would think the 300s/305s, ymmv

 

[Trip]

Currently using the T40-305 18*20 and I really like it. What would be a good option if I want a similar option with maybe a little bit more of power?

Likely the 305S, provided you don't mind a more firm flex and impact response.

 

[Addxyz]

Likely the 305S, provided you don't mind a more firm flex and impact response.

I agree that the 305s is a closer upgrade for you. The 305s will have a better launch angle since the pattern is not as tight.

 

[Roca]

Thank you!

 

[extreme_western]

Anyone have any thoughts on this as a replacement for a Babolat pure control tour?

 

[Vicious49]

One potential issue with the 305S is that many rec players may string it too high in tension with too firm and/or thick a poly to really get the most out of the string bed, which, in order to have enough open-ness, pocketing, trampoline and snapback, really needs a certain amount of thin-ness, softness and/or low tension, to allow that to happen. An important factor in comparing the 305S to the 300S, or most any other 16-main 98.

I think that's the issue with most people that have been complaining about this one being too boardy. These are the strings I've tested so far (all 17g at 45#) in mine from firmest to softest:

1. Cyclone
2. Ice Code
3. RPM Blast
4. Hawk Power

Cyclone felt stiff and boardy. Hawk Power feels almost too soft. The 2 in the middle have played the best with RPM Blast being my favorite so far. I just strung one up tonight with Poly Tour Spin mains and PTP crosses. I have a feeling it may feel too stiff because of the PTS but won't know until I get to hit with it once this cold front moves on.

 

[hdjs94]

Played another match today and so happy that I found this racquet (305s). Serve is amazing, control is so tight and goes exactly where I want it to with enough power and spin. I think my GT98 is definitely going to be used just for fun rallies and such, but for serious play, the 305s is it. My yearlong demoing of racquets may officially be over. The feel to me is as good as it gets and I personally don't think there is another "new" racquet on the market that has this level of connected crisp feel.

Also think my string setup is almost finalized for now, but I'll be playing along with the new solinco/toroline strings just for fun. At least for me, I'm stringing this with Tour bite 16l at 50lb in the mains and Sync 1.20 at 47lb in the crosses for now. Maximum crisp control. May try MSV Bussard in the crosses instead of Sync.