http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/tennis/5167450.stm Ok, I agree its too early to put Fed. there but his argument is that if Fed. should be there, so should Nadal!!!! What the hell!! Just coz. Fed. has lost to Nadal 6 times doesn't mean his other achievements can be undervalued or Nadal, who only has 2 FOs to his credit be talked about in the same breath as Fed. And what's this **** about Sampras not being the top 3 or 4 of all time? Nuke, just think about how many weeks he spent at # 1, the opposition he had and the fact that he won on three different surfaces and not just grass like it was back in the day... Nuke must have been drunk when they interviewed him..