If convicted it's 2 years inside, if not on medical health grounds.
The bar to achieve a medical grounds ruling is high, apparently.
I'm not sure if you are free to play tennis (would the case really just be dismissed?) as if nothing happened if it's a medical grounds ruling.
No doubt easier than sitting inside though.
What is strange is that the lawyers are citing his own statements as proof. A mental health issue has to be certified by a doctor and is still not enough to avoid punishment. Is the law in Australia this bad?
Jeffrey Dahmer was deemed psychologically fit to stand trial, and he tried to create living zombies, then ate people. I don’t think a tennis player with a bad attitude is going to be treated favourably when it comes to mental capacity.
If he is not punished, do you think he might do it again to other partners in the future? Does he lose control in the same way over and over when playing tennis? Do you think he might be like that off the court? What should society do about It to protect the vulnerable?
I’m merely pointing out that you can do some horrific stuff, and psychologists can still view you as fit to stand trial. He was obviously a lunatic, but when it comes to proving insanity in criminal cases, there’s a very high bar that needs to be hit.In no world was Dahmer psychologically fit. All the SK were mentally utterly deranged. It's almost like saying why one is transgender when one simply is.
I’m merely pointing out that you can do some horrific stuff, and psychologists can still view you as fit to stand trial. He was obviously a lunatic, but when it comes to proving insanity in criminal cases, there’s a very high bar that needs to be hit.
I totally agree with you. The point I am trying to make though, is that if someone is mad, it is incredibly difficult to convince a judge that the defendant acted in the way they did due to mental illness. If Kyrgios is trying to get off these charges by blaming mental illness, then he’s going to have a very tough time proving it, as historically, it has been very difficult to prove. I’d say it’s easier for a mad person to convince others they are sane (as you rightly pointed out) than it is for a sane person to convince others that they are indeed mad.If you by any miracle got into the mind of, say, Dahmer - you would see how deranged his mind is. He was a psychopath and psychopaths are fully capable of mimicking emotion that can potentially make them look 'normal' or 'psychologically fit' but they are not. The challenge here is that, you won't be able to separate the two because it's so acute - almost impossible to prove leaving you with no other choice but to allow them to stand in trial. Bundy was even his own lawyer at some point if you read his case. In what world was Bundy normal and yet, he was able to run his own case because he could mimic everything so well.
I totally agree with you. The point I am trying to make though, is that if someone is mad, it is incredibly difficult to convince a judge that the defendant acted in the way they did due to mental illness. If Kyrgios is trying to get off these charges by blaming mental illness, then he’s going to have a very tough time proving it, as historically, it has been very difficult to prove. I’d say it’s easier for a mad person to convince others they are sane (as you rightly pointed out) than it is for a sane person to convince others that they are indeed mad.
No evidence for this. Psychopathy is genetic, so it's perfectly possible for nice parents to produce a psycho, much like two parents with brown eyes can have a child with blue eyes. What you yourself are/have is not necessarily what you're carrying, genetically.He'll of course do it again. He won't be able to help it if and when triggered. He probably inherited from his family and most probably didn't have a proper childhood. The outlook of life is usually warped when being brought up in difficult environments. You won't see a very happy, well rounded family giving birth to a psychopath though the possibility can still exist.
No evidence for this. Psychopathy is genetic, so it's perfectly possible for nice parents to produce a psycho, much like two parents with brown eyes can have a child with blue eyes. What you yourself are/have is not necessarily what you're carrying, genetically.
It’s not solely genetic. Family life when growing up plays a key role in determining your view of right and wrong in later life. If you are brought up in an environment where you see a parent or sibling being abused in a daily basis, you will start to view it as normal behaviour, and it is easy to repeat that behaviour yourself in later life as you’ve never known differently. Of course, you can come from a perfect family too, and be born with a few shorted out circuits, but I would say most psychopaths are made, rather than born.No evidence for this. Psychopathy is genetic, so it's perfectly possible for nice parents to produce a psycho, much like two parents with brown eyes can have a child with blue eyes. What you yourself are/have is not necessarily what you're carrying, genetically.
No evidence for this. Psychopathy is genetic, so it's perfectly possible for nice parents to produce a psycho, much like two parents with brown eyes can have a child with blue eyes. What you yourself are/have is not necessarily what you're carrying, genetically.
It’s not solely genetic. Family life when growing up plays a key role in determining your view of right and wrong in later life. If you are brought up in an environment where you see a parent or sibling being abused in a daily basis, you will start to view it as normal behaviour, and it is easy to repeat that behaviour yourself in later life as you’ve never known differently. Of course, you can come from a perfect family too, and be born with a few shorted out circuits, but I would say most psychopaths are made, rather than born.
No, born not made. Most serial killers don't come from environments of daily abuse. Lots of people do come from abuse and don't become killers.It’s not solely genetic. Family life when growing up plays a key role in determining your view of right and wrong in later life. If you are brought up in an environment where you see a parent or sibling being abused in a daily basis, you will start to view it as normal behaviour, and it is easy to repeat that behaviour yourself in later life as you’ve never known differently. Of course, you can come from a perfect family too, and be born with a few shorted out circuits, but I would say most psychopaths are made, rather than born.
I will respectfully disagree with you.No, born not made. Most serial killers don't come from environments of daily abuse. Lots of people do come from abuse and don't become killers.
No, born not made. Most serial killers don't come from environments of daily abuse. Lots of people do come from abuse and don't become killers.
being depressed gets you off the hook for physically assaulting a woman?
I seem to remember someone who started a thread about helping out an accident victim. I would never be skeptical of that poaster's greatness.Remember how this guy tried to pretend to be great by offering to buy meals for people affected by Covid?
Always be skeptical when someone makes it well known how charitable he is.
Are ewe referring to the Magnanimous Mammary Man of Mira Mesa, so full of the milk of human kindness that Knix has a underwire-free manbra named for him???I seem to remember someone who started a thread about helping out an accident victim. I would never be skeptical of that poaster's greatness.
But don't you think his tennis is... KYRGIDICULOUS?No chance legally of this happening. He has been playing tennis that whole period so his defence of insanity which is what it is fails immediately.
“I didn’t hit her but if I did it was totally not my fault”Wait does this mean he *did* hit her, and is trying to get away with it based on mental health?
Or is he trying to *not get sued at all* based on mental health? Are mentally ill people exempt from prosecution altogether?
SK?In no world was Dahmer psychologically fit. All the SK were mentally utterly deranged. It's almost like asking why one is transgender when one simply is.
I seem to remember someone who started a thread about helping out an accident victim. I would never be skeptical of that poaster's greatness.
Sure sounds like it. Wow.Wait does this mean he *did* hit her, and is trying to get away with it based on mental health?
Or is he trying to *not get sued at all* based on mental health? Are mentally ill people exempt from prosecution altogether?
How do you even prove that at that very moment you were not in your full mental faculties?
Was that really stumping you?
Up to 2 years, he could be let off on a good behavior bond if the judge thinks that is enough punishment.....If convicted it's 2 years inside, if not on medical health grounds.
Remember how this guy tried to pretend to be great by offering to buy meals for people affected by Covid?
Always be skeptical when someone makes it well known how charitable he is.
Yeah I run a Badminton Whatsapp group and it is full of tribal women. Many of them told me that it was the only sport they could play easily in their childhood by just stringing some rope and hitting across it. Cricket, table tennis and tennis requires more money and infrastructure. Over the years, they have become very decent badminton players.
At the tournaments I have volunteered at, ball kids are treated very well. They are given uniforms, food and water and participate in fun activities.
I will be there volunteering for the WTA.
The ATP 250 held earlier this month at the same venue has already been evaluated by the ATP and it has been ranked #2 in the US behind Indian Wells. If you recall, I was a volunteer for that one too.
It definitely plays like an admission of guilt. If you can prove you didn't do it, full stop, there's zero need to bring in any "excuse" type defense.