Nike shorts CJ0539-x vs 934437-x vs 887515-x

**Also posted on Niketalk**

Nike shorts... Can anyone compare the 9" CJ0539-xxx vs 934437-xxx material quality? The latter feels like junk. They look the same in pics, but I only just noticed today that the code was different.

I also like the 887515-xxx. My only complaint (and it might just be the size of my thighs), the "flap" or "split" seems to sort of stick out.
 

mpournaras

Hall of Fame
Maybe post pics. If you want answers don't make the people go do product code research on their own

I have worn almost all the Nike Shorts in one form or another. If you let us know which shorts are which (maybe post their product names or pics) then I can comment on them
 
Fair enough. I guess I give up... Seems I can only insert URLs for images, and it's too much work to find the URL to images on the TW site.

1. 934437-xxx **I hate the material** (https://www.tennis-warehouse.com/Nike_Mens_Winter_RF_Flex_Ace_9_Short/descpageMANIKE-NMWRFS.html)
2. CJ0539-xxx **Similar to #1, but $10 cheaper at regular price** (https://www.tennis-warehouse.com/Nike_Mens_Summer_Premium_Flex_Ace_9_Short/descpageMANIKE-NMSPRFS.html)
3. 887515-xxx (https://www.tennis-warehouse.com/Nike_Mens_Summer_Flex_Ace_9_Short/descpageMANIKE-NMWFSH9.html)
 

mpournaras

Hall of Fame
Fair enough. I guess I give up... Seems I can only insert URLs for images, and it's too much work to find the URL to images on the TW site.

1. 934437-xxx **I hate the material** (https://www.tennis-warehouse.com/Nike_Mens_Winter_RF_Flex_Ace_9_Short/descpageMANIKE-NMWRFS.html)
2. CJ0539-xxx **Similar to #1, but $10 cheaper at regular price** (https://www.tennis-warehouse.com/Nike_Mens_Summer_Premium_Flex_Ace_9_Short/descpageMANIKE-NMSPRFS.html)
3. 887515-xxx (https://www.tennis-warehouse.com/Nike_Mens_Summer_Flex_Ace_9_Short/descpageMANIKE-NMWFSH9.html)
Right click on the image and copy its IMAGE address. Then put that in the image button on TT... unless new accounts are picture limited. anywho:

1:


2:


3:
 

mpournaras

Hall of Fame
1 and 2 are the same material so far as I felt. The RF ones you were paying for a unique color and for the logo. I recall the old Premier Aces used to be a bit shorter but now its just the ones Rafa wears. I liked trying this material on but the price point was way too high for a pair of shorts for me. It is a very comfy material and even though it is a 9' inseam they are a higher crotch than average so they still hit above the knee

3. Is similar but had a somewhat fitted mid thigh. Meaning it hugged my fat ass and flared out a bit at the legs which just was not flattering for me. The material DOES have a fair amount of spandex though (this goes for all the shorts listed) and that is helpful in the range of motion department. Never felt restricted even though it hugged in spots

I am not in love with the "taffeta" feel of Nike's current premium shorts. I wish they were perforated too like Adidas top quality shorts. But damn Nike has the colors on lock. IF you did not like 2 I do not think you will like 1
 
I am not in love with the "taffeta" feel of Nike's current premium shorts. I wish they were perforated too like Adidas top quality shorts. But damn Nike has the colors on lock. IF you did not like 2 I do not think you will like 1
Thanks... That's what I was looking to find out about #1 and #2... Terrible material. I bought one pair of #1 because I wanted the gold, but it's terrible. I want the red-ish #2, but that damn material... They have that red in the cheaper version so that'll have to do.
 
Top