Nike to keep Federer with 10 year deal

Fee

Legend
http://www.sportsbusinessjournal.co...ticle.main&articleId=57885&requestTimeout=900

Nike to keep Federer with 10-year deal
Print This Story
By DANIEL KAPLAN & TERRY LEFTON
Staff writers
Published January 28, 2008 : Page 01

Nike is poised to sign Roger Federer to a new deal that stands to be the most lucrative tennis endorsement ever, sources said.

The 10-year extension could be worth as much as $13 million a year. Sources close to the deal differed on whether that money was fully guaranteed or in part depended on how well tennis’ top male player performs on the court.

If the contract indeed reaches that amount, the deal would make Federer one of the top-paid endorsers at Nike in any sport.

At press time, Federer was two wins away from his third straight Australian Open crown, which would leave him one behind Pete Sampras’ record 14 Grand Slam titles.

Federer’s agent at IMG, Tony Godsick, declined to comment. Nike did not reply to requests for comment by press time.

A source said the deal is expected to be signed in February.

With tennis a secondary sport in the United States, Nike is clearly wrapping up Federer for international exposure. And while Nike could add a Federer line to its sneaker and clothing offerings, tennis is not a big seller, so the deal is seen as more about branding than moving shoes and shirts.

“In the U.S., probably less than 2 percent of athletic footwear sales are tennis,” said John Shanley, an analyst with Susquehanna International, who noted that K-Swiss is a bigger tennis brand in America than Nike. “[Tennis] does get a lot of publicity, a lot of mention in news articles, and a lot more people watch the sport than participate in it. Branding is probably a pretty good part of the deal, particularly in Nike’s European sector, where [tennis] is much more important.”

When Federer in 2002 signed his current deal to wear Nike apparel and shoes, which expires next month, he had no agent and negotiated the deal himself. That contract, which guaranteed the then Slam-less Federer about $1 million annually, was considered in tennis agent circles to be a terrible deal. It’s possible some of the money he is acing with the new deal serves in part as an acknowledgment on Nike’s behalf of the semi-free ride they have had with Federer during his rise.

While he wins consistently and with grace, Federer is not viewed in America as a tennis player who transcends his sport like Andre Agassi or John McEnroe. Overseas, however, in areas where tennis is booming, Federer is a superstar. He costs $1 million an exhibition in the offseason in Asia, and his re-signing comes at a time when Nike is expanding its presence in China.

Shanley points out that Nike’s LeBron James signature basketball sneaker has fared well in China. James’ seven-year, $90 million deal is one of Nike’s top athlete contracts. The gold standard for the company is Tiger Woods, whose contract is believed to be worth around $40 million annually, though that includes royalties from golf ball and apparel sales.

Most tennis endorsement contracts are built around performance, so comparing them is challenging. Maria Sharapova’s Nike deal is believed to guarantee her around $6 million annually. Agassi’s much-hyped deal with Nike in 1995 for more than $100 million was royalty-based.

If Federer’s deal is fully guaranteed, he would easily become the highest-paid tennis endorser. Even if, for example, half the money was guaranteed, it still would make him one of the top, if not the top, endorser.

Nike also counts Serena Williams, James Blake and Rafael Nadal as endorsers.

Not to be ignored in Nike’s re-signing of Federer is the brand’s desire to keep him away from a rival. Adidas, based in Europe, could have been a natural fit for the Swiss player. Some tennis insiders had speculated Polo Ralph Lauren also might make a run at fashion maven Federer, but a spokesman for the company, which sponsors Wimbledon and the U.S. Open, said no offer was made.
 
Last edited:
I just hope that they stick to this deal. If they read this forum they might realize that Fed is washed up, his career is over, and they shouldn't pay him more than a few hundred bucks a year. ;)
 
I just hope that they stick to this deal. If they read this forum they might realize that Fed is washed up, his career is over, and they shouldn't pay him more than a few hundred bucks a year. ;)

If that as apparently he isn't going to win another major.
 
Wasn't Federer's old Nike contract of $1 million a year HUGE for someone that hadn't even won any Grand Slam when it was signed?

I thought most pros on the tour that are sponsored only get free shoes and clothes but not really much cash, if any. And that you really need to be a superstar already to get the big bucks?
 
I just hope that they stick to this deal. If they read this forum they might realize that Fed is washed up, his career is over, and they shouldn't pay him more than a few hundred bucks a year. ;)

I agree Fee, I mean, isn't he retiring soon anyway?
 
He should be able to afford a good coach with his new deal.
 
Does Federer have a lifetime contract with Wilson like Sharapova to Prince?

He definitely sold tons of rackets for them in the last few years.
 
Wasn't Federer's old Nike contract of $1 million a year HUGE for someone that hadn't even won any Grand Slam when it was signed?

I thought most pros on the tour that are sponsored only get free shoes and clothes but not really much cash, if any. And that you really need to be a superstar already to get the big bucks?
Interestingly, I've never heard Federer complain ONCE about the terrible deal he was in with Nike.

Imagine the outrage from most baseball/basketball/football players if they signed a deal like this, and then went on to become a superstar. They would have demanded a renegotiation years ago...!
 
I just hope that they stick to this deal. If they read this forum they might realize that Fed is washed up, his career is over, and they shouldn't pay him more than a few hundred bucks a year. ;)

Also if they read this forum they would realize that since novak and tsonga are clearly the most dominant players in tennis right now since they won a few matches the more sound business decision is obviously to offer those two....















...one hundred billion dollars


sorry, i just wanted to feel like doctor evil :twisted:
 
Does Federer have a lifetime contract with Wilson like Sharapova to Prince?

He definitely sold tons of rackets for them in the last few years.
Yes, he does. Wilson pays Federer $2 million a year for the rest of his life. Add that to this new Nike contract, all of his other endorsement deals (e.g., Gillette, Rolex, etc.), and his prize money, and he could be close to being the first billion dollar man in tennis when it's all said and done. :shock:
 
Yes, he does. Wilson pays Federer $2 million a year for the rest of his life. Add that to this new Nike contract, all of his other endorsement deals (e.g., Gillette, Rolex, etc.), and his prize money, and he could be close to being the first billion dollar man in tennis when it's all said and done. :shock:

2 million a year for the rest of his life? So when he is 70 he will still be getting 2 million dollars a year? You sure about that? I'm not saying you're wrong, that just sounds off to me.
________
Zoloft Lawsuit Information
 
Last edited:
2 million a year for the rest of his life? So when he is 70 he will still be getting 2 million dollars a year? You sure about that? I'm not saying you're wrong, that just sounds off to me.
Yes, that is correct. "For life" means as long as he's still living. Think of it as a pension plan. Even if he lives to be 100, Wilson will still have to keep paying him $2 million a year until he dies.

Agassi has the same deal with Head but I don't know how much he gets a year for the rest of his life.

I believe only Federer, Agassi, and Sharapova have racquet lifetime deals. Not even the GOAT Sampras has one so I assuume Wilson stopped paying him anything once he retired.
 
Yes, that is correct. "For life" means as long as he's still living. Think of it as a pension plan. Even if he lives to be 100, Wilson will still have to keep paying him $2 million a year until he dies.

Agassi has the same deal with Head but I don't know how much he gets a year for the rest of his life.

I believe only Federer, Agassi, and Sharapova have racquet lifetime deals. Not even the GOAT Sampras has one so I assuume Wilson stopped paying him anything once he retired.

I don't think it is as simple as that. He will have to be involved with tennis in some public way. I think "lifetime deal" does not literally mean till death do us part.
 
I don't think it is as simple as that. He will have to be involved with tennis in some public way. I think "lifetime deal" does not literally mean till death do us part.
Sure, he will still have to continue promoting Wilson products after he's retired, just like Agassi still does with Head. Even today, some Head racquets and tennis products still have Agassi's pics on them, so I'm sure Wilson products will too after Federer retires. He will probably also have to help in product design and development, do ads or commercials, other marketing or promotion programs, use Wilson products when he plays on the senior tour or when he's seen in public, talk positively about Wilson when he's interviewed, etc. But, yes, your lifetime doesn't end until you die.
 
Sure, he will still have to continue promoting Wilson products after he's retired, just like Agassi still does with Head. Even today, some Head racquets and tennis products still have Agassi's pics on them, so I'm sure Wilson products will too after Federer retires. He will probably also have to help in product design and development, do ads or commercials, other marketing or promotion programs, use Wilson products when he plays on the senior tour or when he's seen in public, talk positively about Wilson when he's interviewed, etc. But, yes, your lifetime doesn't end until you die.

What if (God forbid) the sportsman is incapacitated for a number of years before his death? Would the deal still continue till his death?
 
2 million a year for the rest of his life? So when he is 70 he will still be getting 2 million dollars a year? You sure about that? I'm not saying you're wrong, that just sounds off to me.

It's called a lifetime contract, and even most avid "fan" doesn't know the exact clauses in the contract. This was announced during the 2005-2006 season.
 
What if (God forbid) the sportsman is incapacitated for a number of years before his death? Would the deal still continue till his death?
So? It still gives Wilson the right to continue using Federer's image (one when he was still playing) on its products, right?

They don't cut off your pension just because you become incapacitated before you die, do they?
 
Also if they read this forum they would realize that since novak and tsonga are clearly the most dominant players in tennis right now since they won a few matches the more sound business decision is obviously to offer those two....

...one hundred billion dollars


sorry, i just wanted to feel like doctor evil :twisted:

I've had it a good reliable source that if Federer had agreed to switch to a 2bh, Nike would have doubled the contract amount but Federer declined citing that switching to a 2bh would ruin his hair cut.
 
there are several athletes with lifetime deals in the world...
its such a great deal lol
but when roger is old $2,000,000 will probably mean nothing b/c of inflation
 
but when roger is old $2,000,000 will probably mean nothing b/c of inflation
Don't worry, I doubt he'll really need the money. He'll have more than enough just living off of the interest he gets from his prize money sitting in the bank.
 
Don't worry, I doubt he'll really need the money. He'll have more than enough just living off of the interest he gets from his prize money sitting in the bank.

that is true...
if he put money even at a decent yield fund (at 7%) it will double the money in 15 years
 
that is true...
if he put money even at a decent yield fund (at 7%) it will double the money in 15 years

Actually, if the money is earning 7% it would double in a little over 10 years based on the rule of 72.

Anyway, I don't think Fed's gonna be hurting regardless.
 
Yes, he does. Wilson pays Federer $2 million a year for the rest of his life. Add that to this new Nike contract, all of his other endorsement deals (e.g., Gillette, Rolex, etc.), and his prize money, and he could be close to being the first billion dollar man in tennis when it's all said and done. :shock:

$ 2 million for the rest of his life...are you sure BP? Holy Crap!!!!!!!
 
there are several athletes with lifetime deals in the world...
its such a great deal lol
but when roger is old $2,000,000 will probably mean nothing b/c of inflation

I am sure he has good financial advisors who will invest wisely for him. Money begets more money, most of the time, unless you are like Borg.
 
$ 2 million for the rest of his life...are you sure BP? Holy Crap!!!!!!!
Yes, that's my understanding.

I don't think it should be that shocking considering what Nike is rumoured to be offering him, i.e., $13 million a year for 10 years. That totals $130 million after 10 years. If he lives another 50 years, the Wilson deal only gives him $100 million total ($2 million/year x 50 years).
 
so... i skimmed through but i couldnt find anything about it... has the deal gone official yet? fees original post said nike was "poisied" to sign him to the deal and that it "could be worth $13 mil a year." so do we know if they have signed him and for how much guarenteed?
 
No, I don't think its been officially signed yet. I'm sure when that happens, Nike will do a press release and make a big deal out of it and there will be many more articles about it. It should be coming up soon though.
 
No, I don't think its been officially signed yet. I'm sure when that happens, Nike will do a press release and make a big deal out of it and there will be many more articles about it. It should be coming up soon though.

Federer visited the Nike US Campus after the Aussie Open.

He signed the contract and greeted +100 Nike employees.

On the first pic you can see Phil Knight on the right.
He also got his 'own Nike building'.

Nikecampus2.jpg


Nikecampus1.jpg
 
Thanks for that. Why no press release? Surely Bob Larson would have covered this, and Tennis Week as well. That's kind of perplexing.
 
Back
Top