No, it's not April Fools: A statue of Andy Murray is due to be unveiled at Wimbledon in 2027

Nothing surprising. The UK goes hard for their heroes and heroines. Virginia Wade won 3 Slams, including Wimbledon, and has a bust on the grounds so why wouldn't Murray get one? I guess he will join Fred Perry with his own statue. Everyday someone is complaining about something. Lol. Congrats to Murray.
 
Although there are far greater Wimbledon players, Murray obviously is a living legend here nonetheless so I can understand this very subjective choice. I can see points to the arguments of both those who find it absolutely deserved and those who could find it a tad surprising .

I guess the mentioning of Nadal's honors at the FO is a bit odd to me because in Nadal's case none of those were garnered because of any patriotic perspective but only from an objective record breaking standpoint. Two very different situations. Here it is a combination of Murray's achievements...and something else. Which is fine. I don't think it's either good or bad really.
 
Last edited:
mourinho-jose-mourinho.gif


Congratulations to all the true believers in The Muzziah Manor.
 
National pride is cool up to a certain degree, but as everything else in life, if we take it to the extremes, it can become a bit fanatic.

Making a statue for Sir Andy Murray at Wimbledon is, no doubt, something very...

I won't continue the sentence because otherwise @Mainad will come after me.

Wimbledon has a long tradition of honouring its home grown heroes. It belatedly erected a statue to triple Wimbledon champion Fred Perry (after years of neglect) and has erected busts of recent lady champions such as Mortimer, Jones and Wade. It's only logical that Andy should be similarly honoured as the only British man to win Wimbledon after Perry.

Maybe it's time the AELTC should get a bit more cosmopolitan and honour the foreign players who have won multiple titles at Wimbleon but that shouldn't affect any decision to honour Andy.
 
Murray fan here and this is too far in my view. The court named after him at Queens made sense, he's the biggest champion there and has won it the most times and it was a nice gesture and fit nicely for a popular English grass event but a statue at Wimbledon feels too forced like they are trying to compete with what RG (justifiably) did with Nadal.

Perry got a statue (won 3 titles) and Wade and other lady champions have got busts so why shouldn't Andy (who won 2 titles plus the Olympics title there) not be similarly honoured? In fact, given what they have done for previous British champions it would be scandalous if they didn't!!
 
Murray? Two Wimby titles, three slams total.

And he’s not even English.

I guess the Brits are getting desperate..

Lol....for the zillionth time Scotland is part of the UK and Scottish people are also British people. Everybody hails cycling champion Chris Hoy, a Scotsman, as a great British hero so why on Earth wouldn't they do it for Andy???
 
Is this the most ridiculous and unintentionally funny question ever asked?
OK, Mentioning Rafa in this quest for honoring Andy is not for equivalence at their respective achievements

it's to direct our attention to RG and the fact Philippe Chatrier has a stadium named after him, though he didn't win any majors.
Nor did Roland Garros.

Same principle here...it's about local heroes and their contribution in the grand scheme and Andy has the higher performance metric than these guys mentioned.
 
Understandable. He's the home hero, not Federer, Djokovic or Nadal (or Sampras, etc).

How "home" really is he since Scotland and England are different countries, is a different story, but it's perfectly clear why he'd be getting one over much more accomplished players.
 
Has someone who isn't an ATG ever been honoured this much? :unsure:

He's a British ATG and that's why the premier British tennis tournament is honouring him just like it has honoured other British ATGs. Perfectly reasonable and logical (that is for those of us who are reasonable and logical).
 
Understandable. He's the home hero, not Federer, Djokovic or Nadal (or Sampras, etc).

How "home" really is he since Scotland and England are different countries, is a different story, but it's perfectly clear why he'd be getting one over much more accomplished players.

Different countries but still one nation (that's why it is called the UK). Plus Andy has now lived about half his life in England.
 
I see nothing wrong. Murray is British. People must live in reality and not their high expectations virtual reality.

Country comes first.
 
Statues for everyone except Djokovic

JCewOs2.jpeg

Fed doesn’t have a statue as far as I know. Certainly not anywhere at a major.

And Novak doesn’t worry about statues. He has the records …

…And Serbia is going to probably name a city after him soon enough.
 
I am trying to be nicer about sport so I will just say congratulations to Andy. Not sure if I can get there with “well deserved”, but congrats to Andy.

So you don't think a British tennis player who won 3 titles at Wimbledon is well deserving? Best write to the committee and demand they take down the statue of Perry and the busts of Wade and other British lady champions then. ;)
 
Fed doesn’t have a statue as far as I know. Certainly not anywhere at a major.

And Novak doesn’t worry about statues. He has the records …

…And Serbia is going to probably name a city after him soon enough.

Not going to let that get in the way of my dunking on Djokovic
 
In the sense of National pride Andy Murray is the greatest British male tennis player in like 90 years, for a country steeped in Tennis tradition, Britain has been fairly mediocre for the last 90 years to be honest.

Look at it from this perspective, an "Immortalised" Murray could serve as an inspiration for other British players but still in Britain Tennis is seen as an "Upper Class" sport whereas Football (Soccer for my American compadres) is an open sport for everyone regardless of background or "class". Is Cricket more popular than Tennis in Britain?
 
In the sense of National pride Andy Murray is the greatest British male tennis player in like 90 years, for a country steeped in Tennis tradition, Britain has been fairly mediocre for the last 90 years to be honest.

Look at it from this perspective, an "Immortalised" Murray could serve as an inspiration for other British players but still in Britain Tennis is seen as an "Upper Class" sport whereas Football (Soccer for my American compadres) is an open sport for everyone regardless of background or "class". Is Cricket more popular than Tennis in Britain?

The best British players of recent times have been anything but upper class although there has certainly been class snobbery besmirching the club's reputation in former times.
 
Funny how any information about Murray's tennis reputation causes so many long and multiple threads, isn't it? ;)
No it's not funny .

This is social media which gives weight to any voice even if irrelevant.

If there was no sm, we would think , nice , they are acknowledging a British player success and giving other British juniors someone to look up to.
 
I say remove voices of non credible people from social media. It would remove 90% or discussion but that is fine. That discussion is irrelevant.
 
Back
Top