Nole has aged better than Fedal. Will that continue?

Will Nole's achievements in 2017 and beyond eclipse Federer's since 2011 or Nadal's since 2016?

  • Yes

    Votes: 46 46.0%
  • No

    Votes: 54 54.0%

  • Total voters
    100
What Fed does now will take years to process since we don't know what (if anything) Nole and Nadal will be doing at a similar age.

The OP compared the big 3 at age 28 and 29 (meaning the results of the seasons each player turned 28 and 29) and opened the discussion of how the Big 3 would compare at 30, 31, 32, etc.. I started with 28 because so many posters had said that was the age players began declining.

At 28 and 29 Nole is the one that won the most of the big 3.

At age 30 it seems the ranking will be Fed, with Nole 2nd and Nadal 3rd. Maybe if Nole recovers and wins the USO Nole could end up with the best record at age 30. But I doubt it.

We will have to wait to see what happens at 31, 32,33 etc.. But it seems that Nadal at 31 will win more than Fed at 31.

I do think that Fed´s and Nadal ´s recent recoveries are a great example for Nole of how an ATG can come back.

Fed at 35 is doing better than Novak at 30. That should give an idea about who is ageing how. Add to that Novak is apparently going for a shoulder surgery which is a really bad news as you rely more on your serves past 30.

The post below sums it up.

>Fed wins two slams at 35
>Nole can't win one at 30
>somehow Nole is fitness God
 
Fed at 35 is doing better than Novak at 30. That should give an idea about who is ageing how. Add to that Novak is apparently going for a shoulder surgery which is a really bad news as you rely more on your serves past 30.

The post below sums it up.

We won't know how Nole ages until he actually ages. Nadal at 31 is on track to win more than Fed at 31. We will have to wait until they all retire to fully compare.

And Fed also couldn't win a Slam in the year he turned 30.
 
We won't know how Nole ages until he actually ages. Nadal at 31 is on track to win more than Fed at 31. We will have to wait until they all retire to fully compare.

And Fed also couldn't win a Slam in the year he turned 30.

How come the topic shifted from 'Novak is ageing better than Fedal' to 'Djokodal may age better than Fed' ?
 
How come the topic shifted from 'Novak is ageing better than Fedal' to 'Djokodal may age better than Fed' ?
Oh, we can look at it either way. One way to think of this is to rank the Big 3 in terms of wins, from best to worst, at age 30, 31, 32, and so on.
 
Oh, we can look at it either way. One way to think of this is to rank the Big 3 in terms of wins, from best to worst, at age 30, 31, 32, and so on.

And if Djok has let us say 1 good year at age 31 winning 3 majors and tapers off, he would be same as what Fed has done from age 30 till now , right ?
 
And if Djok has let us say 1 good year at age 31 winning 3 majors and tapers off, he would be same as what Fed has done from age 30 till now , right ?
No. That's a good point. We can revisit if that happens. Not my central scenario though.
 
Last edited:
What Fed does now will take years to process since we don't know what (if anything) Nole and Nadal will be doing at a similar age.

The OP compared the big 3 at age 28 and 29 (meaning the results of the seasons each player turned 28 and 29) and opened the discussion of how the Big 3 would compare at 30, 31, 32, etc.. I started with 28 because so many posters had said that was the age players began declining.

At 28 and 29 Nole is the one that won the most of the big 3.

At age 30 it seems the ranking will be Fed, with Nole 2nd and Nadal 3rd. Maybe if Nole recovers and wins the USO Nole could end up with the best record at age 30. But I doubt it.

We will have to wait to see what happens at 31, 32,33 etc.. But it seems that Nadal at 31 will win more than Fed at 31.

I do think that Fed´s and Nadal ´s recent recoveries are a great example for Nole of how an ATG can come back.
More like how TO come back ;)
 
Novak looks very fit, very light and youthful. I think he can keep winning more Slams. His diet is actually very healthy and a great diet for an endurance sport like tennis.
 
Looking at the season they turned a certain age:

28:Nole won the most
29: Nole won the most
30: all three had so-so years but Fed won the most
31: Nadal ahead right now but Nole could close the gap
 
Doesn’t mean they aged better, just that they won more because they weren’t challenged by a younger peaking ATG.

2011 Fed could probably win a CYGS if he had Nole’s 2016 field or Nadal’s 2017.
 
Djokovic will have the chance to prove he aged better In the years to come. If he has Feds longevity he should be able to beat the slam rec with todays competition. Amazingly, for a man at 31y, most of his rivals are still older/same age as him:eek:
 
He has not aged better.
His competition at the same age is crap.
And, do not be surprised if none of the BIG-3 wins any slam if 2-3 younger guys suddenly step up next year.
Young blood needs little luck and few victories to throw the earlier generation out.
 
He has not aged better.
His competition at the same age is crap.
And, do not be surprised if none of the BIG-3 wins any slam if 2-3 younger guys suddenly step up next year.
Young blood needs little luck and few victories to throw the earlier generation out.

This. I have a feeling that 2017 and 2018 were Fedalovic's last hurrah, and once the young generation starts winning they won't be giving up their grip
 
This. I have a feeling that 2017 and 2018 were Fedalovic's last hurrah, and once the young generation starts winning they won't be giving up their grip
Quite likely.
I have my hopes on Tsitsipas, Zverev (yes, A Zverev - he just needs one good slam to blaze a trail) , Shapovalov and few others.
Chung was in my list but I read that he has injury issues at such a young age.
 
He has not aged better.
His competition at the same age is crap.
And, do not be surprised if none of the BIG-3 wins any slam if 2-3 younger guys suddenly step up next year.
Young blood needs little luck and few victories to throw the earlier generation out.
Doesn’t mean they aged better, just that they won more because they weren’t challenged by a younger peaking ATG.

2011 Fed could probably win a CYGS if he had Nole’s 2016 field or Nadal’s 2017.

All I'm doing is comparing what was won at what age. When this thread started lots of people were claiming you couldn't win much after 28/29. I'm not opining on the strength of the competition, otherwise we sTaft with the 2003/2006 weak era arguments. Players can only defeat the guy in front of them.
 
Last edited:
Quite likely.
I have my hopes on Tsitsipas, Zverev (yes, A Zverev - he just needs one good slam to blaze a trail) , Shapovalov and few others.
Chung was in my list but I read that he has injury issues at such a young age.

Another major factor is that the toughest period to maintain your form is during the off-period between seasons; it takes only a few weeks of lethargy and not keeping up intensity for your body to physically lose its conditioning and for you to lose your muscle memory (especially the case when you're in your 30s). Djokovic has the most physical regimen which is why he was able to dominate the AO for so long, and Fed must have thought his best chance to win a slam was not Wimbledon (when everyone is in slam-winning form and eager to compete), but the AO when Djokovic was in poor form from 2017-2018, which is why he pushed extra hard during the off-season.

The young players like Shapovalov, Tsitsipas, Zverev, and Chung must fancy their chances to reach the final next AO
 
Quite likely.
I have my hopes on Tsitsipas, Zverev (yes, A Zverev - he just needs one good slam to blaze a trail) , Shapovalov and few others.
Chung was in my list but I read that he has injury issues at such a young age.
So far no young ATG players in sight yet. Fed/Nadal/Djokovic all had convincing win against an ATG player in slams when they were 20, but young guns like Chung/Zverev/Khachanov have failed to score similar achievement. Maybe even younger Tsitsipas/Shapovalov can impress everyone in slams next year, but if that happened, they would need another two or three years to formally break out.
 
All I'm doing is comparing what was won at what age. When this thread started lots of people were sating you couldn't win much after 28/29. I'm not opining on the strength of the competition, otherwise we satrt with the 2003/2006 weak era arguments. Players can only defeat the guy in front of them.
Then you mean he has won better at this age !
Perhaps we can say his competition has not aged like Federer's competition aged - Nadal and Djoker were his competition ! :):)
That 28/29 thing is not true anymore. Medical advancements have turned things in a different way. Now top players put years and mileage but can afford the best medical treatment and physio etc.
Or, maybe, these guys are an anomaly to the general rule and for future generation the expected 28/29 down slide may return.
 
So far no young ATG players in sight yet. Fed/Nadal/Djokovic all had convincing win against an ATG player in slams when they were 20, but young guns like Chung/Zverev/Khachanov have failed to score similar achievement. Maybe even younger Tsitsipas/Shapovalov can impress everyone in slams next year, but if that happened, they would need another two or three years to formally break out.
True. But, any future ATP top player (who I assume is breaking out right now) needs just one tourny to break out.
One good slam, some luck with the way draw opens up and a win.
And, "nothing succeeds like success" may follow.
 
True. But, any future ATP top player (who I assume is breaking out right now) needs just one tourny to break out.
One good slam, some luck with the way draw opens up and a win.
And, "nothing succeeds like success" may follow.
No. It requires both high peak and consistency to be an ATG player. As a young gun, consistency is always a problem, but any young ATG player candidate can have a convincingly win against an ATG player in slams to show his high peak. You can clearly see the high peak of Fed in WC01 and Djokovic in AO08, not to mention Nadal. So far in the next generation, we have not yet found another star.
 
No. It requires both high peak and consistency to be an ATG player. As a young gun, consistency is always a problem, but any young ATG player candidate can have a convincingly win against an ATG player in slams to show his high peak. You can clearly see the high peak of Fed in WC01 and Djokovic in AO08, not to mention Nadal. So far in the next generation, we have not yet found another star.
I did not say ATG. I said next ATP top player.
We canot predict the future but history has shown that all it takes is one season for new crop to take over.
Sadly, few crops did not flourish but I am quite hopeful current young generation will.
 
I did not say ATG. I said next ATP top player.
We canot predict the future but history has shown that all it takes is one season for new crop to take over.
Sadly, few crops did not flourish but I am quite hopeful current young generation will.
No young gun can be ATP top player unless he can defeat Nadal/Djokovic in slams next year (I leave out Fed because he is fading away). If some 20-year-old does that, I would label him as another ATG candidate and he may need two more years before starting to dominate the field. If some 22-year-old does that, I would say he is unlikely to dominate in the next two years. Of course he can be competitive in slams, but he will still be underdog when facing healthy Nadal/Djokovic, who are the goat candidates. In either case, healthy Nadal/Djokovic should remain competitive in slams until 2020.
 
And the hits just keep on coming. Anyone want to change their vote?
Anyone want to be cognizant of the difference between a 38 year old and a 32 year old? Do you have a crystal ball that will reveal whether Djokovic is even still playing at 38?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ann
Anyone want to be cognizant of the difference between a 38 year old and a 32 year old? Do you have a crystal ball that will reveal whether Djokovic is even still playing at 38?
But that’s not the point of this thread. I was comparing the big 3 after 30 at the same age. So Nole in 2017 vs Nadal 2016 and Fed 2011, for example.
 
Anyone want to be cognizant of the difference between a 38 year old and a 32 year old? Do you have a crystal ball that will reveal whether Djokovic is even still playing at 38?
I think Novak will be playing. He is faster than Fed was at 32 and Nadal was at 32.

He hasn't lost speed and explosiveness as Fedal did. Therefore it follows that his career will be longer. It is probably his genetics and thin frame plus gluten free diet. His wear and tear is just minimal.
 
If we go back to the original question of this thread, who would do better starting in the season they turned 30, today all the big 3 are tied at 4 slams.

Fed has won 4 slams since 2011
Nadal has won 4 slams since 2016
Novak has won 4 slams since 2017
 
If we go back to the original question of this thread, who would do better starting in the season they turned 30, today all the big 3 are tied at 4 slams.

Fed has won 4 slams since 2011
Nadal has won 4 slams since 2016
Novak has won 4 slams since 2017

Impressive doesn't quite sum it up.
 
Anyone want to be cognizant of the difference between a 38 year old and a 32 year old? Do you have a crystal ball that will reveal whether Djokovic is even still playing at 38?
If he still hasn't reached 20 or 21 by then, he'll definitely still be hanging around at 38.

He's made it clear so many times that this is what he plays for.
 
And look at all the flak I got for asking the question! And I had to go through the dark period of mid 2016 to mid 2018, when this thread seemed to make no sense. But things can change fast

I mean so many didn't even give him a chance to come back, after only a half year of poor play. It was just Jan 2017.
 
My theory is that Djokovic will be retired long before 37 because by then his main rivals will be retired and he will already be the all-time men's grand slam champion.
 
If he still hasn't reached 20 or 21 by then, he'll definitely still be hanging around at 38.

He's made it clear so many times that this is what he plays for.
That's what I meant about crystal ball. Historically in the Open era, about 2.3% of male players take the court at age 38 and most lost first rounf. I don't buy for a minute that either Nole or Rafa will be playing on the ATP tour at age 38. Stats are overwhelmingly on my side, and I ain't no stats person. I revile stats and data, but I'll use it in this case.
 
That's what I meant about crystal ball. Historically in the Open era, about 2.3% of male players take the court at age 38 and most lost first rounf. I don't buy for a minute that either Nole or Rafa will be playing on the ATP tour at age 38. Stats are overwhelmingly on my side, and I ain't no stats person. I revile stats and data, but I'll use it in this case.

Nadal will play until RG 2022 when he turns 36.
Then, he will retire.
 
Djokovic is like a machine. If there's a grain of sand in the machinery, he starts malfunctioning, totally loses it and throws the match away. That's why I can't see him being as successful as Federer at 37. Once his age will become a real handicap, it will completely throw him off and he won't be able to cope with it.

But I'm a silly, ordinary human so hopefully he will prove me wrong in 5 years.
 
That's what I meant about crystal ball. Historically in the Open era, about 2.3% of male players take the court at age 38 and most lost first rounf. I don't buy for a minute that either Nole or Rafa will be playing on the ATP tour at age 38. Stats are overwhelmingly on my side, and I ain't no stats person. I revile stats and data, but I'll use it in this case.
And yet stats have proven to be almost irrelevant because the game has changed so much.

You also constantly said over the last few years that they wouldn't be able to keep winning slams at 31-33. But here they are. Novak's 32 and has won 4 of the last 5 majors. That's unprecedented in tennis history. Rafa just capped off another 3-peat of a slam at 33. Roger's closing in at #2 in the world at 38. Historical trends don't really matter anymore. Not as long as medicine/recovery keeps improving and NextGen keeps being god awful.
 
Back
Top