ghostofMecir
Legend
i try to steer away from weak era arguments, which I find silly. So I focus on comparing actual wins
Not really about weak eras, but the fact that Federer at age 30 had two future GOATs 4 and 5 years younger than he respectively and had to win slams against them. For ND and RN, they were either playing contemporaries (i.e., themselves), someone older, i.e., Federer, or younger players who aren’t ATGs and never will be.
Had Federer not been competing at age 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, etc., vs. literally two of the greatest players ever, he’d have “aged” even BETTER than he has and he already has a case for aging better than anyone by returning to #1 at the oldest age ever.