Not only do I hope they keep the blue clay in Madrid, but make all clay blue.

ChanceEncounter

Professional
It's funny growing up watching tennis Red hardcourts were pretty common..no HD..white tennis ball...normally one camera angle.

I think you people are staring at the computer to much and have ruined your eyes if you can't follow the ball lol
Yes, we should all go back to the days of watching tennis matches in black and white, on grainy 9 inch TVs. I mean, they did it in the old days!

I'm glad you like to brag about your perfect vision, but it doesn't matter that you or I can see the ball fine. If a significant portion of your audience is having trouble, then as a TO, you should be thinking of ways to make it better. I applaud Tiriac and his inventiveness and willingness to make the viewing experience more enjoyable. It's not perfect, obviously, but he's at least making strides to help and promote the sport.
 

SystemicAnomaly

Bionic Poster
Tbh I find the red clay a lot easier on the eyes - much more comfortable to watch. My eyes grew tired after watching a few sets on this newfangled blue dirt.

You may have a color sensitivity to the color. Do you have difficulty with full spectrum lighting or light with a bluish tinge? How about bright natural lighting? You may be in the minority on this.

I find the red clay color to be very taxing on my eyes. In fact, I find it down right annoying. Perhaps is partially due to the lack of contrast with a yellow ball. I also happen to be somewhat sensitive to the yellow/orange part of the spectrum.

Blue appears to be the future of tennis courts. The AO, USO and the USO series are all played on blue courts.Many (hard) courts in my area have been switching to blue in the past couple of years.


I still can't see why they can't simply work on changing the colour of the ball. Tiriac intends to do this even for the blue clay.

What's the opposite of red clay on the colour spectrum? That's all you need to know to produce better visibility.

ITF currently mandates that the fabric color of tennis balls must be white or yellow. Premium (tournament) balls have become significantly brighter since the 90s. It might be difficult to make them any brighter.

http://www.itftennis.com/technical/rules/equipment/appendixi.asp

Current optic yellow balls are greenish-yellow. They could be changed to a different "yellow" and still comply with the rules of tennis. My vote would be for an orange-yellow color for green (or blue) courts. Optic orange balls stand out quite well on a green court. However they are not legal for play for most tournament (while an orangish-yellow should be ok) . Note that orange is one of the official colors for table tennis balls (the other official color is white). Don't see why tennis cannot adopt a third color.

Neither orange or orange-yellow would work well for red clay. Some other solution is needed for clay. Blue clay seems to be a good solution. I may be wrong but I believe that blue tennis balls might be more difficult to track (even against a red clay background). I believe that the human eye might do better with a green ball against a red background.
 

SystemicAnomaly

Bionic Poster
Honestly, Ive never not been able to track a tennis ball.

Then again, I have 20/15 vision

Acuity has very little to do with color discrimination. Visual tracking is also different from acuity. 20/15 vision really says nothing about smooth pursuit and saccadic tracking abilities.


It's easier to see the ball at Wimbledon on the green grass because it's almost always cloudy and gloomy there, without the bright sunshine that can wash out the color of the ball and the courts.

Also, the modern Slazenger Wimbledon ball is probably the brightest ball on the planet. It may also have less green than most greenish-yellow tennis balls. To my eyes, the Dunlop Grand Prix ball is the next brightest.
.
 
Last edited:

BreakPoint

Bionic Poster
I'm watching the Madrid highlight show on Tennis Channel right now and the difference in visibility of the moving ball on the blue clay versus the red clay during the Nadal-Ferrer Rome semi that I just watched earlier is DRAMATIC! It was so hard to track the ball during the Nadal match on red clay and so easy to track the ball on blue clay in the Madrid matches. This was essentially a side-by-side comparison and blue clay wins hands down!
 

cork_screw

Hall of Fame
I love the blue color. But also, I would just love to see a different variation of a clay surface, preferably one that's faster.

When the clay season rolls around, all the tournies whether 500/1000 all seem to mirror each other. There's no difference and it creates a monotonous viewing experience. I get sick of the clay season, it seems that whether you're watching rome or monte carlo or barcelona, they're all the same.

Madrid this year stood out, it felt refreshing to see something much different. If anything, they should keep the color but maybe put an additive or tweak the formulae to make it more manageable. It doesn't have to be one or the other whether you have it or not, you can maybe add some type of loose grit to make it gain more traction and experiment. I don't know why people are treating it like it's either or nothing.
 
1

1970CRBase

Guest
It isn't just the surface that decides how fast the game is played, it is also the racquet and string tech and what balls they decide to use. Don't talk about "tradition" and "real" clay, today's clay court game is not like the 70's or 80's super slow clay court game, it is medium slowish.
 

10is

Professional
I don't quite understand this "blue" clay business -- it's clay regardless; by that line of reasoning we should also be distinguishing between the various subtypes of hardcourts and their varied colors and contesting the legitimacy of a certain type of hard surface (with a certain type of color) being called a "hardcourt".
 

tlm

G.O.A.T.
Okay blue clay lovers your dream is gone, now with real clay the 2 best players are in the finals. So go ahead and keep wishing everything was blue but it is done with along with fed.
 

sureshs

Bionic Poster
Okay blue clay lovers your dream is gone, now with real clay the 2 best players are in the finals. So go ahead and keep wishing everything was blue but it is done with along with fed.

They can also beat him on blue clay, but they were not stupid enough to risk injury in a minor tournament with RG and O coming up. Fed can enjoy beating Birdie in the minor leagues.
 

kragster

Hall of Fame
I don't quite understand this "blue" clay business -- it's clay regardless; by that line of reasoning we should also be distinguishing between the various subtypes of hardcourts and their varied colors and contesting the legitimacy of a certain type of hard surface (with a certain type of color) being called a "hardcourt".

Blue is a pretty cool color for clay but I don't agree with any tennis surface having less than perfect footing. Yes MC also needs to be fixed from what we saw this time. The blue is nice to see on the TV, if they can keep the color and improve traction then we have a winner.
 
I don't care if you have x-ray vision, the blue clay is no significant improvement in terms of ball visibility.

Here's an idea, why don't we see if the All England Club will dye its grass blue. Grass is green, in case you weren't aware.

What's funny is that you're absolutely okay with being absolutely wrong. A yellow ball on a deep blue surface is scientifically demonstrably more clear to a viewer than a yellow ball on a traditional red clay surface. There is simply a higher color contrast.

During bright day matches in Rome, the coverage on Tennis Channel made it relatively much more difficult to track the ball.

It's one thing if you want to argue for tradition but don't try to pretend there is any scientific basis for what you're saying. You'll just look foolish and stubborn.

Rome has a wonderful, laid back feel with beautiful grounds, in contrast to the gaudy feel of Madrid.

This has nothing to do with the color of the clay. The tournament in Rome is very old and very traditionally Roman. Madrid is a new blood tournament.

I guess we'll just assume you've been to both tournaments, right?
 

BreakPoint

Bionic Poster
They can also beat him on blue clay, but they were not stupid enough to risk injury in a minor tournament with RG and O coming up. Fed can enjoy beating Birdie in the minor leagues.
Yes, because both Djokovic and Nadal proved that in Madrid......uh....oops.....they were both clueless and couldn't adapt on blue clay and lost early, didn't they? :oops:
 

Bartelby

Bionic Poster
Adapt to the blue clay-like substance, more accurately, but the reality is that Nadal-Djoko are now at the top.
 

BreakPoint

Bionic Poster
Adapt to the blue clay-like substance, more accurately, but the reality is that Nadal-Djoko are now at the top.
Whatever. Federer is the only guy who can play on anything......blue clay, carpet, wood, ice, gravel, brick, sand, - you name it. :)
 
1

1970CRBase

Guest
Whatever. Federer is the only guy who can play on anything......blue clay, carpet, wood, ice, gravel, brick, sand, - you name it. :)

Hence such fierce resistance by the boys. They fear where one change, intentional or not, just might lead.
 

FlashFlare11

Hall of Fame
Adapt to the blue clay-like substance, more accurately, but the reality is that Nadal-Djoko are now at the top.

Well, depending on the result tomorrow, Djokovic and Nadal may not be at the top. As of right now, Federer and Djokovic are top two. That may not change.
 

tlm

G.O.A.T.
Yes, Federer was the best and still has the best game, but he's no longer at the top.

Ya right he has the best game but he can no longer win a major, this makes a lot of sense. It really looked like he had the best game today against joker. Well i guess it makes sense if you are a ******* that lives in la la land.
 

Bartelby

Bionic Poster
Yes, best game when comparing a 25 year old with 25 year old. At the moment, Fed is an increasingly distant third, which is still a remarkable achievement.
 

BreakPoint

Bionic Poster
Ya right he has the best game but he can no longer win a major, this makes a lot of sense. It really looked like he had the best game today against joker. Well i guess it makes sense if you are a ******* that lives in la la land.
The best movie doesn't always win an Oscar.
The best TV show doesn't always win an Emmy.
The best book doesn't always win a Pulitzer.
The best song doesn't always win a Grammy.
The best scientist doesn't always win a Nobel Prize.

Likewise, the best game doesn't always win a major. Winning a major is not the only thing that determines "the best game".
 

FlashFlare11

Hall of Fame
The best movie doesn't always win an Oscar.
The best TV show doesn't always win an Emmy.
The best book doesn't always win a Pulitzer.
The best song doesn't always win a Grammy.
The best scientist doesn't always win a Nobel Prize.

Likewise, the best game doesn't always win a major. Winning a major is not the only thing that determines "the best game".

Well, when you already have the most majors...
 
Some of Fed's loses were somewhat out of his control. Players he usually beats playing out of their comfort zone. Like Tsnonga, Berdych, Arod... I really think the Berdych and Tsonga matches would have went that way for Nadal too, Djoko would maybe have toughed them out but but even skeptical of that. If it was not for those draws and performances Fed may have been No.2 already especially if he would play Monte Carlo. That is a 500 point hole right from the get go if he wins the extra 500 to replace it!
 
The best movie doesn't always win an Oscar.
The best TV show doesn't always win an Emmy.
The best book doesn't always win a Pulitzer.
The best song doesn't always win a Grammy.
The best scientist doesn't always win a Nobel Prize.

Likewise, the best game doesn't always win a major. Winning a major is not the only thing that determines "the best game".

No it seems to be the best draw. Good points.
 
mellowyellow;6550135 If it was not for those draws and performances Fed may have been No.2 already especially if he would play Monte Carlo. That is a 500 point hole right from the get go if he wins the extra 500 to replace it![/QUOTE said:
*******s with all excuses. What a bunch of losers.
 

FlashFlare11

Hall of Fame
Some of Fed's loses were somewhat out of his control. Players he usually beats playing out of their comfort zone. Like Tsnonga, Berdych, Arod... I really think the Berdych and Tsonga matches would have went that way for Nadal too, Djoko would maybe have toughed them out but but even skeptical of that. If it was not for those draws and performances Fed may have been No.2 already especially if he would play Monte Carlo. That is a 500 point hole right from the get go if he wins the extra 500 to replace it!

I think playing against Tsonga or Berdych, the winner is usually whoever can better execute an aggressive game plan without too many errors. Those two can blast Federer off court, but he can outsmart them by not allowing extended rallies. I think Nadal and Djokovic are much better at getting everything back, thus allowing a higher chance for an unforced error. But Roger also plays a high-risk game, thus making many errors in addition to winners.
 

tlm

G.O.A.T.
Yes, best game when comparing a 25 year old with 25 year old. At the moment, Fed is an increasingly distant third, which is still a remarkable achievement.

So now it was when fed was 25? Like i said you do not live in reality, now you say fed is a distant 3rd. But how can that be if he has the best game?
 

tlm

G.O.A.T.
The best movie doesn't always win an Oscar.
The best TV show doesn't always win an Emmy.
The best book doesn't always win a Pulitzer.
The best song doesn't always win a Grammy.
The best scientist doesn't always win a Nobel Prize.

Likewise, the best game doesn't always win a major. Winning a major is not the only thing that determines "the best game".

Really then what determines the best game then? It has been a long time since fed has won a major and it looks like he has little chance in the future. So keep living in the past if you wish but fed has nowhere near as good a game as joker a nadal do now.

This should be pretty obvious to anyone that has been watching tennis in the last couple of years, that is to anyone that does not live in dreamland.
 

Bartelby

Bionic Poster
If a new Fed emerged five years younger than Nadalovic then Id take Fed, but by current results its all too obvious to need discussion.



So now it was when fed was 25? Like i said you do not live in reality, now you say fed is a distant 3rd. But how can that be if he has the best game?
 

Sentinel

Bionic Poster
Reminds me of ...

The best movie doesn't always win an Oscar.
The best TV show doesn't always win an Emmy.
The best book doesn't always win a Pulitzer.
The best song doesn't always win a Grammy.
The best scientist doesn't always win a Nobel Prize.

Likewise, the best game doesn't always win a major. Winning a major is not the only thing that determines "the best game".
All that is gold does not glitter,
Not all those who wander are lost;
The old that is strong does not wither,
Deep roots are not reached by the frost.

From the ashes a fire shall be woken,
A light from the shadows shall spring;
Renewed shall be blade that was broken,
The crownless again shall be king.
 

SystemicAnomaly

Bionic Poster
... At the moment, Fed is an increasingly distant third, which is still a remarkable achievement.

Ok, so Fed ONLY made it to the SF at the 2012 AO and, at this point, he has the best W-L match record for the year. And currently #2 on the planet. How does this make him an increasingly distant 3rd?

.
 
Last edited:
1

1970CRBase

Guest
have ppl really forgotten? the clay game of the 70's and 80's was slow as in SUPER slow, today it is medium slowish, it's not just the surface it is also the tech that was the game changer as to how the clay game as a whole played.

Lets have a new experiment : the next Madrid tournament, Tiriac suddenly announces just before the first match that ALL the players will be playing with a mandatory wooden Jack Kramer/Maxply strung with old strings. No more babolatian madness. The players will be provided with their racquets before the beginning of each match.... :)
 

darrinbaker00

Professional
Lets have a new experiment : the next Madrid tournament, Tiriac suddenly announces just before the first match that ALL the players will be playing with a mandatory wooden Jack Kramer/Maxply strung with old strings. No more babolatian madness. The players will be provided with their racquets before the beginning of each match.... :)

One small problem: only players who are sponsored by Wilson or Dunlop could play.
 

BreakPoint

Bionic Poster
One small problem: only players who are sponsored by Wilson or Dunlop could play.
The wood racquets will be painted all black so any pro sponsored by any company can play. Just put a sticker with the sponsor's name on the racquet and its logo on the strings. :)
 

tlm

G.O.A.T.
^There is a difference between ability and execution.

So this means what? Fed has the best ability but cannot execute it anymore? Wow what a waste he has the most ability but can't out play joker or nadal any longer when it counts at the majors. Ya okay this makes a lot of sense i guess to somebody.
 
1

1970CRBase

Guest
The wood racquets will be painted all black so any pro sponsored by any company can play. Just put a sticker with the sponsor's name on the racquet and its logo on the strings. :)

one game with those we shall hear from the traditionalists that they want to go back to REAL tennis racquets.
 

BreakPoint

Bionic Poster
So this means what? Fed has the best ability but cannot execute it anymore? Wow what a waste he has the most ability but can't out play joker or nadal any longer when it counts at the majors. Ya okay this makes a lot of sense i guess to somebody.
It means that both Nadal and Djokovic are 5-6 years younger than Federer so they can still run around like rabbits. That doesn't mean they have better games than Federer.
 
Top