Not sure whats with french, but their ovation this year was moving.the crowd was pretty shameful in their applause of errors on one side of the net and gasps at errors on the other. the french crowds have earned bragging rights again.
Not sure whats with french, but their ovation this year was moving.
Perhaps, but i havent seen anything similar in my viewing history. They paid a tribute to great champion, even if they dislike him. It was powerful either way.Quite hypocritical from them. Whole match cheering against Djok, then applauding him when he loses. Next year they'll go back to rooting against him, you can bet on it.
Reminds me of Cycling. The French hated Eddy Merkx for winning Tour de France every year. Then when he finally lost against a frenchman and ended second, they started cheering for him. Hypocrits.
Perhaps, but i havent seen anything similar in my viewing history. They paid a tribute to great champion, even if they dislike him. It was powerful either way.
Link me similar tennis related stuff then.You have seen too little then.
What a complete abomination it was. It is one thing to cheer for your favorite , but to cheer for opponents first serve faults is the lowest I have seen since I started watching tenis (excluding davis cup).
No Fault of Federer either, but makes me want him to lose more and more so the crowd support can be more balanced.
This was awful. I thought Wimbledon was bad, but this usopen crowd wants me to build a temple for them. Atleast they didn't cat call on frequent basis to disrupt the match and didn't applaud on opponent's serve fault.
This was a terrible as a Novak fan to see what he went through. But the way he shut up the crowd was sweet!
The support need not be balanced. It just should not impede match play.
Some of Novak fans think it is unfair if Fed or Rafa get more support. That is not correct.
Fans gravitate towards the player whom they are attracted to.
It is ok for Fed to get cheered more, but it is not right to cheer when Novak makes an UFE or serves a double fault.
Federer faced similar treatment v Agassi at the US Open in 2005, Agassi did versus Connors in 1989 and so on. This will help Djokovic become a greater player and mentally stronger.
If you let the crowd get to you, then you're playing primarily for them, and are therefore an entertainer, and have no right to the trophy. Djokovic proved he's championship material by overcoming such a zealous crowd, just like Fed and Agassi and other did before him.
Yea no kidding.. "Real 'Murican Sports"Agree. They know nothing of tennis etiquette, they should go and watch NFL or baseball instead.
You don't have to look further than this forum to know about irrational worship of Federer. It is understandable if the moneyed guys were behind Federer, but why should the plebes who make up most of the spectators also think like that? They can dream about Rolex watches and Netjets flights, but they will never experience them.
...the difference today is that a raucous player [ala mcenroe] would not be in direct contrast with the general viewing public..
You don't have to look further than this forum to know about irrational worship of Federer. It is understandable if the moneyed guys were behind Federer, but why should the plebes who make up most of the spectators also think like that? They can dream about Rolex watches and Netjets flights, but they will never experience them.
Hypocrital is the perfect word to describe the FO crowd.Quite hypocritical from them. Whole match cheering against Djok, then applauding him when he loses. Next year they'll go back to rooting against him, you can bet on it.
Reminds me of Cycling. The French hated Eddy Merkx for winning Tour de France every year. Then when he finally lost against a frenchman and ended second, they started cheering for him. Hypocrits.