Notable players and their H2H against slam winners

NatF

Bionic Poster
#1
Picked the 10 most notable slam winners from the last couple of generations, Ferrero should probably be included will update later. Massive lol at Cilic.

1) Federer: 201-103 (66.12%) - 65.47%
2) Nadal: 138-75 (64.79%) - 65.18%
3) Djokovic: 144-81 (64%) - 68.53%
4) Hewitt: 89-78 (53.29%) - 47.37
5) Murray: 75-75 (50%) - 55.19%
6) Safin: 53-60 (46.90%) - 50%
7) Roddick: 51-69 (42.50%) - 33.94%
8) Del Potro: 44-63 (41.12%) - 40.94%
9) Wawrinka: 45-84 (34.88%) - 37.86%
10) Cilic: 18-70 (18.37%) -
29.63%

The italic'd numbers are their percentages against top 10 players, bolded are players who's record against slam winners is worse than against top 10 players.
 
Last edited:
#4
Picked the 10 most notable slam winners from the last couple of generations, Ferrero should probably be included will update later. Massive lol at Cilic.

1) Federer: 201-103 (66.12%) - 65.47%
2) Nadal: 138-75 (64.79%) - 65.18%
3) Djokovic: 144-81 (64%) - 68.53%
4) Hewitt: 89-78 (53.29%) - 47.37
5) Murray: 75-75 (50%) - 55.19%
6) Safin: 53-60 (46.90%) - 50%
7) Roddick: 51-69 (42.50%) - 33.94%
8) Del Potro: 44-63 (41.12%) - 40.94%
9) Wawrinka: 45-84 (34.88%) - 37.86%
10) Cilic: 18-70 (18.37%) -
29.63%

The italic'd numbers are their percentages against top 10 players, bolded are players who's record against slam winners is worse than against top 10 players.
Shw Federer h2h against all time great. Darling Roddick ,Hewit and Murray inflate this. It was no secret that Fed is best ever at beating lesser players. Tell us something we don't know already
 
#5
Also
Picked the 10 most notable slam winners from the last couple of generations, Ferrero should probably be included will update later. Massive lol at Cilic.

1) Federer: 201-103 (66.12%) - 65.47%
2) Nadal: 138-75 (64.79%) - 65.18%
3) Djokovic: 144-81 (64%) - 68.53%
4) Hewitt: 89-78 (53.29%) - 47.37
5) Murray: 75-75 (50%) - 55.19%
6) Safin: 53-60 (46.90%) - 50%
7) Roddick: 51-69 (42.50%) - 33.94%
8) Del Potro: 44-63 (41.12%) - 40.94%
9) Wawrinka: 45-84 (34.88%) - 37.86%
10) Cilic: 18-70 (18.37%) -
29.63%

The italic'd numbers are their percentages against top 10 players, bolded are players who's record against slam winners is worse than against top 10 players.
Misleading stats. In Wawrinka ,Delpo and cilic and Murray era they had slam winners like Big 3 while Rods, Hewit ,Safin didn't have to deal with them. It also take in to account win against slam winners when they were not slam winners. Very misleading.
 
#15
I don't mind giving the same value to 1 slam and 20 slam players. Stat is pretty clear and informative. I would like to see more of these stats showing Fed (and Nad) on the top, Lew already has Novak covered.

Sent from my Redmi Note 4 using Tapatalk
 
#40
Picked the 10 most notable slam winners from the last couple of generations, Ferrero should probably be included will update later. Massive lol at Cilic.

1) Federer: 201-103 (66.12%) - 65.47%
2) Nadal: 138-75 (64.79%) - 65.18%
3) Djokovic: 144-81 (64%) - 68.53%
4) Hewitt: 89-78 (53.29%) - 47.37
5) Murray: 75-75 (50%) - 55.19%
6) Safin: 53-60 (46.90%) - 50%
7) Roddick: 51-69 (42.50%) - 33.94%
8) Del Potro: 44-63 (41.12%) - 40.94%
9) Wawrinka: 45-84 (34.88%) - 37.86%
10) Cilic: 18-70 (18.37%) -
29.63%

The italic'd numbers are their percentages against top 10 players, bolded are players who's record against slam winners is worse than against top 10 players.
Matches won vs Elo >2400:

Djokovic 54.69%
Nadal 44.44%
Federer 40%
Del Potro 36.36%
Murray 31.58%
Wawrinka 14.63%
Safin 14.29%
Cilic 13.64%
Roddick 12.50%
Hewitt 6.67%
Ferrero 0%
Interesting lists.....
 

NatF

Bionic Poster
#41
This thread is perfectly encapsulates the phenomenon known as Lew.

  1. Writes sarcastic point
  2. Get's owned by his own double standards
  3. Replies with "Your dumb" "It's dumb" etc...
  4. Get's pointed back to his own double standards again
  5. Ignores said ownage and starts spewing elo stats
Rinse and repeat.
 
#44
This thread is perfectly encapsulates the phenomenon known as Lew.

  1. Writes sarcastic point
  2. Get's owned by his own double standards
  3. Replies with "Your dumb" "It's dumb" etc...
  4. Get's pointed back to his own double standards again
  5. Ignores said ownage and starts spewing elo stats
Rinse and repeat.
A stat that when regurgitated in isolation suggests that Nadal was a stronger player when he lost to Berdych at the AO 2015 than when he played Djokovic in the 2012 final.
 

Tennis_Hands

Talk Tennis Guru
#49
This thread is perfectly encapsulates the phenomenon known as Lew.

  1. Writes sarcastic point
  2. Get's owned by his own double standards
  3. Replies with "Your dumb" "It's dumb" etc...
  4. Get's pointed back to his own double standards again
  5. Ignores said ownage and starts spewing elo stats
Rinse and repeat.
I have a confidential information, but you will have to promise to keep it for yourself as it is an industrial secret.

The new model washing machine from Miele will be called "Lew X".

With:

PostDosing
TwinPost liquid solvent
PowerBS 3.0
SingleStatWash
MultipleStatWash
QuickStatWash
MultiLingua
StarMap Drum with single bulb low-energy consumption lightning
Weee-Feeeee disconnection
SlowStart and Countdown indicator.
LogicProof TM System (LPS)
Logic Out of control System
Logic protection Guarantee
Profi RandomStat Generator (PRSG)
Hot Air connection
AutomaticOverload Recognition
Thread Defficiency Guarantee
Locoback (depending on the local availability of academic power)

Guaranteed Squeaky-clean Stats every time.

:cool:
 
Top