Ganstaz003
Rookie
So if peak version of Novak Djokovic from 2011's US Open final played peak version of Rafael Nadal from 2013's US open final and tournament, who would win?
Only 2010 Nadal would stand a chance against 2011 Djokovic.
2011 Nadal wasn't far from 2013 Nadal and he had to go to hell and back to even take a set from Djokovic who then breadsticked him despite having no serve.
2013 Djokovic > 2015 Djokovic and 2013 Djokovic is the same as 2011 Djokovic so I'll go with Nadal in 4. The difference is Nadal would get Djokovic in a chokehold like he did at the USO 2013 meaning even a well playing Novak wouldn't be able to play his game because Nadal would be hitting forehand down the lines one after another.
When Djokovic already gave up on the match and was spraying errors left right and centre. Nadal invested 30000% of his energy to win one set. Besides, Nadal's form in 2011 was a lot better than Djokovic's in 2013.Nadal breadsticked Djokovic in 2013 too lol
You have a very short memory.In 2011 Nadal didn't have his deadly FH DTL. Care to explain how Novak would handle those bombs when he's always struggled to do so?
When Djokovic already gave up on the match. Nadal invested 30000% of his energy to win one set. See the difference?
You have a very short memory.
So if peak version of Novak Djokovic from 2011's US Open final played peak version of Rafael Nadal from 2013's US open final and tournament, who would win?
wtf, Djokovic didn't lose his advantage because he was tired, go watch both matches again cause you're talking s**tSo did Djokovic in set 2 and even set 3 but he lost that against a clutch Nadal.
Highlights rarely tell the story. That's why they are called HIGHLIGHTS, not MATCH SUMMARYWell care to explain then? Go watch the USO 2013 highlights and you'll see Djokovic struggling to handle the FH DTL's from Nadal when they're zipping through the court.
Djokovic had to come down to earth for Nadal to start beating him again, who are you fooling.When he brings that against 2011 Djokovic, what can he do? Nadal didn't have his FH DTL shot in 2011 as good as 2013. This was the biggest improvement he made to start beating Djokovic.
wtf, Djokovic didn't lose his advantage because he was tired, go watch both matches again cause you're talking s**t
Highlights rarely tell the story. That's why they are called HIGHLIGHTS, not MATCH SUMMARY
Djokovic had to come down to earth for Nadal to start beating him again, who are you fooling.
Same thing with Djokovic's BH DTL, it wasn't even 1/5 as good in 2013 as it was in 2011. We can play all day. A confident peak Djokovic isn't losing to Nadal on any hard court.
Even extended highlights have like 25% of all points. They are awesome to watch but you can't judge the entire match properly based on them alone.He gave everything in set 2 and 3 and was only able to win one set then got breadsticked in the last set because Nadal molly whopped him.
Well if you wanna watch the whole match then go ahead but normal people will watch highlights to get a point across.
Nadal leads 2-1 at the USO where Nadal beat Djokovic in his peak years and is 2-2 across all HC slams. Djokovic had to go 5 sets on his favourite surface to beat Nadal at the AO. Nadal will have plenty of chances son.
He gave everything in set 2 and 3 and was only able to win one set then got breadsticked in the last set because Nadal molly whopped him.
Nadal leads 2-1 at the USO where Nadal beat Djokovic in his peak years and is 2-2 across all HC slams. Djokovic had to go 5 sets on his favourite surface to beat Nadal at the AO. Nadal will have plenty of chances son.
Because that's what the 3 points in the highlights said LMAO.He gave everything in set 2 and 3 and was only able to win one set then got breadsticked in the last set because Nadal molly whopped him.
Either rewatch the whole match (because you clearly either didn't see it or don't remember it) or keep getting exposed further. Highlights don't tell the full story, you only see flashy winners (which Djokovic hit a bunch of himself, even more than Nadal) but never the errors.Well if you wanna watch the whole match then go ahead but normal people will watch highlights to get a point across.
Oh s**t here comes the h2h again.Nadal leads 2-1 at the USO where Nadal beat Djokovic in his peak years and is 2-2 across all HC slams. Djokovic had to go 5 sets on his favourite surface to beat Nadal at the AO. Nadal will have plenty of chances son.
Good, that's one match. Now let's talk about the rest of their AO matches during Djokovic's domination... Ooops, error 404: Nadal not found. What a surprise.Nadal leads 2-1 at the USO where Nadal beat Djokovic in his peak years and is 2-2 across all HC slams. Djokovic had to go 5 sets on his favourite surface to beat Nadal at the AO. Nadal will have plenty of chances son.
Don't insult the 2015 Machine and 2011 Monster by putting them on the level of 2013 Choker.2013 Djokovic > 2015 Djokovic and 2013 Djokovic is the same as 2011 Djokovic so I'll go with Nadal in 4. The difference is Nadal would get Djokovic in a chokehold like he did at the USO 2013 meaning even a well playing Novak wouldn't be able to play his game because Nadal would be hitting forehand down the lines one after another.
Either rewatch the whole match (because you clearly either didn't see it or don't remember it) or keep getting exposed further. Highlights don't tell the full story, you only see flashy winners (which Djokovic hit a bunch of himself, even more than Nadal) but never the errors.
If you wanna base your opinion of a particular match on highlights then the only person you will get your point across is to a 7-year old with a cold.
Oh s**t here comes the h2h again.
2-2 at the US Open, 6-1 at the AO, 5-0 at the WTF. I rest my case.
Good, that's one match. Now let's talk about the rest of their AO matches during Djokovic's domination... Ooops, error 404: Nadal not found. What a surprise.
Are you purposefully being obtuse? I said people watch highlights to get a point across. I'm not going to rewatch the whole match to get a single point across about Nadal zipping his FH DTL winners against Djokovic when it's crystal clear that's what he was doing and Djokovic was struggling with the topspin and the power generated from it, no one does that. Maybe you should to that since you have 0 clue about the 2013 USO final and the difference between the two Nadals.
You claim yourself to be a "tennis pro" but I haven't seen any technical knowledge come from you.
What are these imaginary numbers? lol
2-2 at HC slams. Those are facts. And Nadal leads 2-1 at the USO.
Yeah right.Lol mate you're lucky Nadal got injured at the AO 2014 otherwise it would've been a 4 set victory if Djokovic beat Stan.
Yeah right.
Nadal didn't make it to Djokovic in 2008, 2011, 2013, 2015, 2016. Am I about to hear that he would have beaten Novak in all those years if he was healthy?
As evidenced by Wawrinka barely scraping past Djokovic in the QF and then butchering Nadal in the final (would've been straight sets if Stan didn't lose focus and finished the job in 3 like he should)Nope. Just 2014. It's pretty clear who was more confident and in better form in that tournament.
As evidenced by Wawrinka barely scraping past Djokovic in the QF and then butchering Nadal in the final (would've been straight sets if Stan didn't lose focus and finished the job in 3 like he should)
Have you ever played a visibly injured opponent? You lose all your focus. Actually, Nadal played a lot better in the 4th set than he did in the 3rd but Wawrinka finally got his act together after spraying dumb errors in the 3rd.lol gimme a break.
An injured Nadal took a set of peak Wawrinka.
How are you still here?We have not seen Nadal's peak yet.
Nope. Just 2014. It's pretty clear who was more confident and in better form in that tournament.
Oh look, we have a new troll who believes that Nadal serving on WTA level and having no weapons in 2011 is the same as 2013 Nadal who actually had a great serve and a great down the line forehand and was completely outplaying Djokovic.oh look , we have a new troll who believes that djokovic spraying UE after UE for 2 sets in 2013 is the same as djok in 11 who was playing at his best and completely outplaying nadal.
jeez, what a surprise !
Oh look, we have a new troll who believes that Nadal serving on WTA level and having no weapons in 2011 is the same as 2013 Nadal who actually had a great serve and a great down the line forehand and was completely outplaying Djokovic.
2011 in four tight sets
Djokovic had opportunities in the 2013 match to go up 2 sets to 1
2011 Djokovic doesn't waste those opportunities he took it to Nadal in that match instead of choking and hitting unforced error after unforced error
Some of that was due to Rafa being clutch though
Rafa also played better in the 2013 final and had bigger weapons
Think Djokovic wins something like 6-4 7-5 5-7 6-3