Also mentioned was Thiem and Med. But no call out for Zed.
He mentions Zed at 4:55Some bubbles are bigger than others.
Tsitsipas who has never been beyond R2 “is as good as all of the top 3 guys.”
The towel thing which he mentioned should be made permanent. No more fetching player towels. It’s always been a vector for disease.
Some bubbles are bigger than others.
Tsitsipas who has never been beyond R2 “is as good as all of the top 3 guys.”
The towel thing which he mentioned should be made permanent. No more fetching player towels. It’s always been a vector for disease.
So many people try to score points by slamming these top guys, but I have to say that I can't imagine having the kind of poise and diplomacy he has when I was age 33. But I REALLY want to see the end of towels!
The last time Federer have defeated Djokovic at the HC Slam people were still trying to invent the electricity. Federer has the same effect on Djokovic's chances on winning a HC Slam as the penguins from Antarctica. GTHOH with that talk..No Fedal or Wawrinka
Lets hope we end up with some great tennis these coming few weeks in NYC.
Yes, he must be happy that two players that haven't beat him on hard court slam for more than decade, and more than 7 years are missing... Same for Wawruins who can't beat healthy Novak...No Fedal or Wawrinka
Wawrinka
I mentioned Wawruineka...
McNamee has defended Djokovic's actions regarding the Adria tour, including publishing a letter form the Serbian authorities that states that if they could take all the blame for what happened in order to leave Djokovic alone they would.
Are you aware of that position (of McNamee)?
I could not type more due to some weird gboard errors.
Yes, it does, as it shows that he is ready to defend Djokovic from the indefensible (in the case of Adria Tour): he basically chose to support the idea that Djokovic's responsibility should be neglected and that it was all good. What you quoted is only an extension of that apologetic line.
I don't know why McNamee would take such a stance, but it is there.
That's because, say anything criticising serena and you'll be labelled "misogynist, anti women, racist, sexist, etc etc...."
Thiem will choke
Anyway it's funny how the media sees one event from two totally opposite angles, and all that solely because of the person in question.
More like they are changing their tune because they know they will have to likely crown Djoker the champ.
Anyway it's funny how the media sees one event from two totally opposite angles, and all that solely because of the person in question.
If I post a link confirming what I said will you admit that you were wrong and McNamee's position is highly suspect?
Very true. I like it better when they praise him because then he does not have a vengeance to win. He is dangerous when he feels attacked.
It was a test for your integrity, and you failed.
Here:
Something very bad that he said... very bad.
I watched the Venus match. Players having to get their own towels seems to decrease towel use, which seemed to keep the games moving, and showed they don't really need to towel off every point. If the men's side is similar than this change will be great.
Yes, wawa win were legitimate, he is bad matchup for Novak, but I think those times passed away... Wawa is not that player anymore...
Does Djoker beat wawa last year at USO if healthy?
Impossible to argue that when you put it like that.
