GabeT
G.O.A.T.
First, a small point. In my argument Novak need not reach 6 FOs to equal Borg. I was addressing the point that Novak is several tiers below Borg on clay. Had he won, say, 5 FOs I don’t think anyone would say he was several tiers belowYou are right maybe but also not 100% certain whether Novak would really have won more than six. He is way more vulnerable at RG than at other slams, take 2015 as an example: had he lost against Nadal in the quarters we would likely tend to give him a hypothetical win in the absence of Nadal and would not consider the possibility of him losing to Stan which is what happened in reality.
Anyways: if we take such drastic what-ifs like removing THE number one rival, we can built a lot of impressive scenarios. Take Nadal out and Fed likely wins two CYGS or also a number of FO similar to Borg.
So in conclusion, I agree that if we assume the best possible hypothetical for Novak aka taking the main rival out, then he (and Fed) could have a similar number of FOs as Borg if we leave for him everything as is. Not sure how much this says though.
As for the hypothetical, you are right. I’m saying that change some initial conditions and the results are pretty different. But that’s true for all players, not just Djokovic. It’s one of the reasons I don’t think hypotheticals are very useful.