SO TRUE! IMO, it is absurd to have 2 Masters in successive weeks. Why can't they schedule another tournament between Madrid and Rome? IW and Miami are 10-12 day events where top players usually get a day off between matches. IMO, Novak is being an outstanding sportsman in this interview as he knows he was greatly disadvantaged with his Rome scheduling. That happened a few years ago when he had bad scheduling in Madrid and Rome. He won Madrid but lost the Rome final that year too.
I think the way the tour handles both clay and grass is just stupid. I say no reason why clay can't be better spaced. At least they have increased time between grass events now, and finally an M500. But there should be a couple M1000 events each year on grass.
The problem with grass is not recent either. I was shocked recently looking at Borg's career to see how little grass he played. We think of him as this marvel on grass, 5 Wimbledon's in a row coming right off RG, but there were many years when he played no grass except Wimbledon. That's worse than what we see today, where many players only play a tune up. The surfaces have been badly divided up since the USO switched to clay and then HCs. In fact, the switch from grass to clay and then HCs seems to have hurt Borg because during his reign at Wimbledon he could not play the USO on grass, and he did not bother with the AO since he had no change at a grand slam. Year after year he played 7 official matches on grass each year.
It's really badly thought out today.