no Excuses for anyoneThe main point here is Novak was ready physically and didn't carry any injury going in.
Rafa beat the best version of current Novak.
Unlike what Novak did in AO 2019.
He is being more than generous and lavish in his praise for Rafa. He has always been a wonderful and gracious opponent in his losses.
U kiding right?Novak was unbeatable AO2019, no one and any version human couldnt beat him on that tournament.The main point here is Novak was ready physically and didn't carry any injury going in.
Rafa beat the best version of current Novak.
Unlike what Novak did in AO 2019.
Actually, it was the reverse. Novak’s plan was to punch Rafa hard but Rafa evaded all the attack. Novak was shell shocked that his punches were hitting air, so his backup plan was throw harder punches.Everyone has a plan until they get punched in the mouth.
- Mike Tyson
Surprised that Rafa played great in the RG final
Everyone has a plan until they get punched in the mouth.
- Mike Tyson
Both players did wonderful press conferences. Very good discussions and analysis, without any saltiness or making excuses.
I have been just as critical of Novak as anyone about some of his behaviour this year, but he showed terrific sportsmanship during and after the match imo.
I'm dead.Djoko played like that one kid we all know from back in the days FIFA (or PES) session on Play Station: he knows he can't win so he produces own goals like a madman to laugh his insecurity off.
To be fair 2014 was a long time back. Novak hadn't seen the RG Reality for a long time and was 'rusty' in that department xDSurprised that Rafa played great in the RG final
The main point here is Novak was ready physically and didn't carry any injury going in.
Rafa beat the best version of current Novak.
Necks can be tricky.
I really don't like the guy, but if his neck was really bothering him, and that wasn't just a tactical MTO...it can really affect your play. I had a strained (left) latissimus recently from stomach-sleeping w/head turned to the side, and it absolutely killed my speed and my BH. I played through it, but I wasn't very good.
I'm not trying to make excuses for him but if the injury is real then it could explain why he was SO flat.
Tbf Nadal was pretty aggro as well, except his landed inActually, it was the reverse. Novak’s plan was to punch Rafa hard but Rafa evaded all the attack. Novak was shell shocked that his punches were hitting air, so his backup plan was throw harder punches.
Basically Novak got the rope the dope treatment.
“A 12 time RG champion’s level surprised me.”
- Abraham Lincoln
- Joker
Before the final I told a friend who gave Djokovic favorite that Rafa in the final at Roland Garros with Federer's one-step record would enter the field with the intention of losing only when he was dead or if someone shot him in the leg.
Djoke was trying to subdue the fail at the USO by artificially pumping his ego before the match with Nadal. If his (Djoke's fans) thought that he got over it in a heartbeat just because he won Rome, well ... . Do not forget, "Majors are a different beast", with their own development and histories flowing in the next.
If not for the proximity of the Slam record, I’m sure Rafa would be retired too. Rafa is just much more politically correct and would never admit that. The guy loves boating, has a family he has yet to start Bc of his dedication to tennis, and his academy. The record is what keeps him on the tour, let’s be honest. Same for Djokovic. For Roger, it’s highly likely that protecting the record is what’s kept him going as well. These three guys should thank each other Bc without each other they would not be at or close to 20 Slams. Would have prob hung up their racquet at 16-17. Look at Pete, he lost motivation at age 30 and 14 slams Bc no one at the time was remotely challenging his record. Of the Big 3 I can only see Federer being the one who stays on tour for love of the game. The fans adore him, the entire world admires him, and the sponsors won’t stop giving him more money. And the nex gen all kow tow to him. It’s who he is though, you know. Of the Big 3 he does the most PR, charitable work, and proactively reaches out to befriend younger players. Not saying Rafa and Djokovic don’t do these things but Roger has set the standard in all of these things without anyone else to emulate. It is part of his personality and so he is probably the only one who keeps playing for love of the game. After all the heartbreakers he’s had against Rafa and Novak only that deep love for the game can keep him coming back. In contrast, remember Borg? A loss to McEnroe when he was only 25 prompted him to give up and retire. Roger is the polar opposite. He never stays down after being beaten.Really interesting press conference. I think it's great Djokovic is so open about his thoughts actually. But the answer that actually made me go is the one where he said that if he didn't think that he could still overtake Rafa/Roger he would retire today. That is absolutely insane to me and explains so much about him that I never really could place before. In so many tournaments, especially the early rounds against opponents that don't really challenge him he seems lackluster and almost bored, like he doesn't want to be there. Only to be hyper focused in the final. For him it's definitely the destination and not the journey. Polar opposite to Fed/Nadal approach. It's fascinating to me and I honestly couldn't say which mindset is better for longevity and getting those records.
I think you’re just inventing this, there’s no reason at all to think the US Open played any part. He was playing a Nadal that significantly raised his quality from all the previous rounds - incredible depth, power, tactics and almost no unforced errors. Novak actually would have beaten anyone else in the final but had to try to match Rafa’s level and couldn’t do it without errors. No player in history could have matched Nadal playing like that.
i
If not for the proximity of the Slam record, I’m sure Rafa would be retired too. Rafa is just much more politically correct and would never admit that. The guy loves boating, has a family he has yet to start Bc of his dedication to tennis, and his academy. The record is what keeps him on the tour, let’s be honest. Same for Djokovic. For Roger, it’s highly likely that protecting the record is what’s kept him going as well. These three guys should thank each other Bc without each other they would not be at or close to 20 Slams. Would have prob hung up their racquet at 16-17. Look at Pete, he lost motivation at 30 Bc no one at the time was remotely challenging his record. Of the Big 3 I can only see Federer being the one who stays on tour for love of the game. The fans adore him, the entire world admires him, and the sponsors won’t stop giving him more money. And the nex gen all kow tow to him. It’s who he is though, you know. Of the Big 3 he does the most PR, charitable work, and proactively reaches out to befriend younger players. Not saying Rafa and Djokovic don’t do these things but Roger has set the standard in all of these things without anyone else to emulate. It is part of his personality and so he is probably the only one who keeps playing for love of the game. After all the heartbreakers he’s had against Rafa and Novak only that deep love for the game can keep him coming back. In contrast, remember Borg? A loss to McEnroe when he was only 25 prompted him to give up and retire. Roger is the polar opposite. He never stays down after being beaten.
Do you saw Nadal playing like that before?Im watching tennis almost last 10 years, never saw Nadal so agressive against Djokovic. He made almost all shots and thats different story.Surprised by the guy he played 55 times before...
Nadal was fresher of the two and was somehow much faster than he was previously in the tournament. I've seen that many, many times in RG finals. He won 29 more points than Djokovic, who made 38 more UE than Nadal. That's the key stat. Djokovic also had more winners, for what it's worth.Do you saw Nadal playing like that before?Im watching tennis almost last 10 years, never saw Nadal so agressive against Djokovic. He made almost all shots and thats different story.
U kiding right?Novak was unbeatable AO2019, no one and any version human couldnt beat him on that tournament.
Nadal was fresher of the two and was somehow much faster than he was previously in the tournament. I've seen that many, many times in RG finals. He won 29 more points than Djokovic, who made 38 more UE than Nadal. That's the key stat. Djokovic also had more winners, for what it's worth.
Fresher or Djokovic injuries doesnt have to do anything with match end. Nadal won like 4x more 0-3 rallies shots, i dont remember exactly stats but it was like 0-3 rallies shots ~50 Nadal and ~13 Djokovic, longer rallies being about equal. Nadal never played like that against Djokovic before, he was going for the lines even from BH side, its absolutely crazy. I believe hes old and couldnt move for long time/cant risk his to get injurie again, so he played very aggresive and except the best.Nadal was fresher of the two and was somehow much faster than he was previously in the tournament. I've seen that many, many times in RG finals. He won 29 more points than Djokovic, who made 38 more UE than Nadal. That's the key stat. Djokovic also had more winners, for what it's worth.
SF/F he was unbeatable, before SF opponents were lower level anyway. Nadal couldnt even keep the ball in play when he was hiting his FH into Djokovic BH, it was crazy really.lol. The HC GOAT (Federer) at the peak of his powers would have beaten that Novak. It’s not like he didn’t lose a set in the tournament.
- Thirdly Novak didn't play bad at all, maybe it wasn't his best final, but the point is Nadal was just a beast on the court. He made/forced Nole go for riskier shots.
Do you saw Nadal playing like that before?Im watching tennis almost last 10 years, never saw Nadal so agressive against Djokovic. He made almost all shots and thats different story.
Rafa was just playing very solid tennis. Nothing crazy good but consistent. WhereasDhojovic was just off. I dont know who told him to hit dropshot after dropshot bc that was a ******** strategy. and the unforced errors followed.Nadal was fresher of the two and was somehow much faster than he was previously in the tournament. I've seen that many, many times in RG finals. He won 29 more points than Djokovic, who made 38 more UE than Nadal. That's the key stat. Djokovic also had more winners, for what it's worth.