If he didn't care about Masters 1000, he wouldn't play the Montecarlo optional, no matter how near it is of where he lives. If Queens were located in Mallorca, Nadal would not play it.It proves that he lives in Monte Carlo and rides his bike to the tournament.
Why wouldn't Novak care about the Masters, as they are the most prestigious events outside the slams?Incorrect. If he didn't care about Masters 1000, he wouldn't play the optional Montecarlo, no matter how near it is of one of his houses (he has more houses in Miami and Serbia).
https://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/ind...eady-become-the-goat-in-the-next-slam.636531/Looks like Novak will go all in during this clay season.
Now,Surprise surprise...
He cares about it, ofcourse.It proves Novak cares about Masters 1000. He plays even the optional.
Nadal on clay is still a formidable force thoughWhen it is time to feast on the buffet / go full vulture mode , why let go opportunity
If Queens were located in Mallorca, Nadal would not play it.
If he didn't care about Masters 1000, he wouldn't play the Montecarlo optional, no matter how near it is of where he lives. If Queens were located in Mallorca, Nadal would not play it.
2011 too.Fed was playing the optional Monte Carlo several times after it became optional.
2016 post knee surgery.
2015
2014 (lost final to Stan)
Lol yeah.It proves that he lives in Monte Carlo and rides his bike to the tournament.
If he didn't care about Masters 1000, he wouldn't play the Montecarlo optional, no matter how near it is of where he lives. If Queens were located in Mallorca, Nadal would not play it.
Federer could potentially be playing Madrid without Nadal and Djokovic in the draw...
Federer could potentially be playing Madrid without Nadal and Djokovic in the draw...
Which means Zzzzzz
Federer could potentially be playing Madrid without Nadal and Djokovic in the draw...
Not at all, Fed is not certain to win by any stretch of the imagination, could be Zverev, Theim perhaps others. Makes the end result a bit uncertain which it usually isn't, a bit of new blood is good. "zzzz" is Nadal at MC without Djokovic, though Novak could lose early and it'll be another Nadal strolls to the title scenario. Which isn't epic
Zzzzzz
Epic is Nadal winning MC with Djokovic in the draw, which is a real possibility #SavageJesus
Tennis fans when Nadal wins matches on clay
I think so. Nadal loves to play almost everything on clay.Well of course he cares about masters, so agree there. There will be some that he will skip but I do think the fact that he lives there makes it an easy decision to play since there is no travel involved. For instance if he lived in Rome and was only going to play 2 clay masters he would probably play Rome and drop one of the others. Djokovic in general though has played most masters every year, he's skipped very few.
Can't really compare queens since it's not a masters and Nadal often needs a break after dominating clay season. He has played either Halle or queens in 2004-2008, skipped all grass in 2009, played in 2010-2012, 2014-2015 (played Stuttgart and Queens in 2015) skipped all grass in 2016. So really 2013, 2017 and 2018 are the only years he's played Wimbledon and not played Halle or Queens. However they are also the only warmup events on grass and Djokovic has 3 on clay, but that's another reason you can't compare
However do you think if instead of Barcelona there was a 500 in Italy, Nadal would play that every year in the congested clay stretch?
Nadal recently said he wants to play Madrid and will only skip Miami.Federer could potentially be playing Madrid without Nadal and Djokovic in the draw...
Federer could potentially be playing Madrid without Nadal and Djokovic in the draw...
Are you unaware that Nadal has played Queen's multiple times and won the event in 2008?
Are you unaware that Nadal has played Queen's multiple times and won the event in 2008?
Nadal is one of just 7 players in the Open Era to complete the Queen's-Wimbledon double (along with McEnroe, Connors, Becker, Sampras, Hewitt and Murray).
Incredible the mighty Henman never won a tournament on grass, yet it was his best surface.
Not house... apartment.Thought he had a house in Monte Carlo, so would make sense.
Just a theory going around lately to explain his losses. Even though they're completely explainable without having to make excuses for him.Why wouldn't Novak care about the Masters, as they are the most prestigious events outside the slams?