Maybe because Its the biggest individual sport in the world?Why are they obsessed with tennis?
Deserved!
Maybe because Its the biggest individual sport in the world?
For starters, many tennis ATGs have votes.Why are they obsessed with tennis?
One guy’s won six of them.Novak won the 2019 Laureus World Sportsman of the Year!
Thought this prestigious award is worth a thread of its own.
Congrats to Novak! A more thoughtful tennis player the world has not seen.
Fantastic! Federer has certainly won a lot of these, but this thread is for Novak. Please respect that.Fed has six of them.
Federer has won 5 sportsman of the year awards and a come back award. Great for him and for tennis.One guy’s won six of them.
I am just amazed at the depth of his thinking. Truly Remarkable. Easily if he had been a scientist, he would have won a Nobel Prize.
Federer has won 5 sportsman of the year awards and a come back award. Great for him and for tennis.
But he is not nominated this year. Why do you bring this up?
actually as sportsman of the year he won 5, and 1 additional he got last year for comeback of the year(2 statuette in one year)One guy’s won six of them.
Beli3ve 21Ewwww
And one guy will have 21 of themOne guy’s won six of them.
Yes. Jelena is legendary. Most beatiful wife of tennis players.Loved his speech and Jelena's words from that small video clip.
Truly legendary.
Or Cristiano.Is the award a big deal in Europe? It gets no press coverage in the States. It also seems biased towards individual sports. There have been years where athletes like Lebron or Messi should've won.
Yeah, I know I look like Djokovic.It looks like DeNiro winning another oscar ...
Let's not put Djokovic as more "intellectual" than Federer or Nadal. He is for sure a very smart guy, but not necessarily the most intelligent tennis player on the tour.Articulate, thoughtful, intellectual, cares about others, etc.
It's a shame that many posters have convinced themselves that he's unlikable because he occasionally loses his cool (98% self-directed) or used to rip his shirt off, or some other flimsy grounds. As for another great male tennis player who is this smart and thoughtful, I have to go back to the late, great Arthur Ashe.
There is definitely untold part of the story. But thankfully that IS behind Novak and they are happy together again.So Jelena basically confirmed what we all knew from the jump:
She was the reason that was holding Djokovic back from achieving GOAT status.
it's not so awful, black pieces lacked in development(it can not be dangerous for whites with only two pieces in play for blacks) it tells becker not a good chess player(or don't know about debut principles), but white pieces did it better, queen side of whites also is much weaker, but white pieces can bring in big problems on a king side.. it's funny how djoko lost these pawns especially considering a fact that becker played only with his queen and a knight), then whites can even make it better position for the win with right moves afterwards, probably it's blacks' turn to make a move..we also don't know about next stages of this game..because it's just the beginning(debut),yes probably after next move queen a2 whites will be without 3 pawns but it's not so crucial if you're not a pro chess player)Let's not put Djokovic as more "intellectual" than Federer or Nadal. He is for sure a very smart guy, but not necessarily the most intelligent tennis player on the tour.
I am sure Fedal would destroy Djokovic in an intellectual game like chess.
Look at the awful board position:
I'm sitting on the fence
Sorry, but Djokovic has lost 2 pawns and is about to lose his third one, since it is Becker's turn. And 3 pawns down is a crucial disadvantage, 3 pawns down is the equivalent of being one knight or one bishop down. Djokovic needs a miracle to win that game (even though Becker is not Bobby Fischer precisely).it's not so awful, black pieces lacked in development(it can not be dangerous for whites with only two pieces in play for blacks) it tells becker not a good chess player(or don't know about debute principles), but white pieces did it better, queen side of whites also is much weaker, but white pieces can bring in big problems on a king side.. it's funny how djoko lost this pawns especially considering a fact that becker played only with his queen and a knight), then whites can even make it better position for the win with right moves afterwards, probably it's blacks' turn to make a move..we also don't know about next stages of this game..because it's just the beginning(debut),yes probably after next move queen a2 whites will be without 3 pawns but it's not so crucial if you're not a pro chess player)
it's not so awful, black pieces lacked in development(it can not be dangerous for whites with only two pieces in play for blacks) it tells becker not a good chess player(or don't know about debute principles), but white pieces did it better, queen side of whites also is much weaker, but white pieces can bring in big problems on a king side.. it's funny how djoko lost this pawns especially considering a fact that becker played only with his queen and a knight), then whites can even make it better position for the win with right moves afterwards, probably it's blacks' turn to make a move..we also don't know about next stages of this game..because it's just the beginning(debut),yes probably after next move queen a2 whites will be without 3 pawns but it's not so crucial if you're not a pro chess player)