Ganstaz003
Rookie
Well, he has clearly surpassed Federer for me. 5 Wimbledon titles whilst embarrassing Federer three of those times and having to beat Nadal twice > Federer's 3 Wimbledon titles where he had to beat Nadal and Djokovic to win.
I could care less about the other 5 Wimbledon titles he racked up against utter scrubs and low-tier opposition. Stats matter, but not just simple stats (such as 8 Wimbledon titles > 5 Wimbledon titles), but also complex stats that factor deeper details. In this case, Djokovic's 5 Wimbledon titles > Federer's 8 Wimbledon titles for the reasons I mentioned.
But for now, I'll have to say Sampras has the greatest legacy at Wimbledon, despite it being very difficult to compare Djokovic and Sampras due to how different grass court was in each other's eras.
I could care less about the other 5 Wimbledon titles he racked up against utter scrubs and low-tier opposition. Stats matter, but not just simple stats (such as 8 Wimbledon titles > 5 Wimbledon titles), but also complex stats that factor deeper details. In this case, Djokovic's 5 Wimbledon titles > Federer's 8 Wimbledon titles for the reasons I mentioned.
But for now, I'll have to say Sampras has the greatest legacy at Wimbledon, despite it being very difficult to compare Djokovic and Sampras due to how different grass court was in each other's eras.