FiReFTW
Legend
The longer I keep watching some tennis youtube videos the more odd these ratings seem.
Why are the ratings so stuffed together?
Why don't they have a much bigger range between NTRP 2.0 and 7.0?
It seems to be that UTR is much more accurate and better way to measure skill, and even that is slightly too much stuffed together.
For example I was watching these 2 tennis matches on youtube today:
Both are 4.0 NTRP levels it seems, but the quality difference is absolutely astonishing, those 2nd guys would crush the 1st video guys easily.
So im genuenly wondering, the person who came up with these ratings, why did they make such a stuffed ratings when you could basically probably make like 4-5 separate ratings out of each of these NTRP 4.0 or 4.5 or whatever?
Not that I really care a great deal about it, but it does seem extremely weird and odd to me that someone with the same rating is vastly superior to another, hmm... heck the 2nd vid guys even seem better than some 4.5s
Why are the ratings so stuffed together?
Why don't they have a much bigger range between NTRP 2.0 and 7.0?
It seems to be that UTR is much more accurate and better way to measure skill, and even that is slightly too much stuffed together.
For example I was watching these 2 tennis matches on youtube today:
Both are 4.0 NTRP levels it seems, but the quality difference is absolutely astonishing, those 2nd guys would crush the 1st video guys easily.
So im genuenly wondering, the person who came up with these ratings, why did they make such a stuffed ratings when you could basically probably make like 4-5 separate ratings out of each of these NTRP 4.0 or 4.5 or whatever?
Not that I really care a great deal about it, but it does seem extremely weird and odd to me that someone with the same rating is vastly superior to another, hmm... heck the 2nd vid guys even seem better than some 4.5s