Number of different players who have won each Slam during the Open era

[JennyS]

Australian Open: 26
French Open: 25
Wimbledon: 19
US Open: 22


Full List of winners:

Australian Open:
1. Bill Bowrey
2. Rod Laver
3. Arthur Ashe
4. Ken Rosewall (2)
5. John Newcombe (2)
6. Jimmy Connors
7. Mark Edmondson
8. Roscoe Tanner
9. Vitas Gerulaitis
10. Guillermo Vilas (2)
11. Brian Teacher
12. Johan Kriek (2)
13. Mats Wilander (3)
14. Stefan Edberg (2)
15. Ivan Lendl (2)
16. Boris Becker (2)
17. Jim Courier (2)
18. Pete Sampras (2)
19. Andre Agassi (4)
20. Petr Korda
21. Yevgeny Kafelnikov
22. Thomas Johannson
23. Roger Federer (3)
24. Marat Safin
25. Novak Djokovic
26. Rafael Nadal

French Open: 25
1. Ken Rosewall
2. Rod Laver
3. Jan Kodes (2)
4. Andres Gimeno
5. Ilie Nastase
6. Bjorn Borg (6)
7. Adriano Panatta
8. Guillermo Vilas
9. Mats Wilander (3)
10. Yannick Noah
11. Ivan Lendl (3)
12. Michael Chang
13. Andres Gomez
14. Jim Courier (2)
15. Sergi Bruguera (2)
16. Thomas Muster
17. Yevgeny Kafelnikov
18. Gustavo Kuerten (3)
19. Carlos Moya
20. Andre Agassi
21. Albert Costa
22. Juan Carlos Ferrero
23. Gaston Gaudio
24. Rafael Nadal (4)
25. Roger Federer




Wimbledon: 19
1. Rod Laver (2)
2. John Newcombe (2)
3. Stan Smith
4. Jan Kodes
5. Jimmy Connors (2)
6. Arthur Ashe
7. Bjorn Borg (5)
8. John McEnroe (3)
9. Boris Becker (3)
10. Pat Cash
11. Stefan Edberg (2)
12. Michael Stich
13. Andre Agassi
14. Pete Sampras (7)
15. Richard Krajicek
16. Goran Ivanisevic
17. Lleyton Hewitt
18. Roger Federer (6)
19. Rafael Nadal

US Open: 22
1. Arthur Ashe
2. Rod Laver
3. Ken Rosewall
4. Stan Smith
5. Ilie Nastase
6. John Newcombe
7. Jimmy Connors (5)
8. Manuel Orantes
9. Guillermo Vilas
10. John McEnroe (4)
11. Ivan Lendl (3)
12. Mats Wilander
13. Boris Becker
14. Pete Sampras (5)
15. Stefan Edberg (2)
16. Andre Agassi (2)
17. Patrick Rafter (2)
18. Marat Safin
19. Lleyton Hewitt
20. Andy Roddick
21. Roger Federer (5)
22. Juan Martin Del Potro

 

[Moose Malloy]

The '68 AO was not Open(amateur only)

 

[RCizzle65]

Interesting numbers, shows how hard it is to win the AO and FO, AO since there are always fresh players showing their talent to the fullest, and FO since it is so demanding on the body

 

[kOaMaster]

Interesting numbers, shows how hard it is to win the AO and FO, AO since there are always fresh players showing their talent to the fullest, and FO since it is so demanding on the body

you could also argue that wimbledon (&the uso) are harder and it needs something more special to win, having a good day is not enough. that's why usually in those two tournaments the world leaders win (=best players).

 

[Cyan]

List shows that the AO and the FO are the toughest to win in consecutive yrs. for a player. Nobody has won the AO for more than 2 consecutive yrs. or the FO for more than 4 consecutive yrs. Meanwhile the USO and Wimbledon have been won for 5 consecutive yrs. by the same player....

 

[T10s747]

What is shows you is how great Borg, Federer and Sampras were. Hell, no one went to Aussie in the 70s & 80s, it was too far and in December.