I ask questions because many threads involve word descriptions where the words, 'on edge' for example, are not well defined. If the terms are loose it's hard to know what is meant or to look at a video to understand the issue. If we were to ask readers to draw a racket moving through a service motion 'on edge' what would they draw? But I can draw a racket face facing the sky or one edge on to the ball at the Big L position. [
Big L is near straight arm and racket forming an up side down "l". ] After I show readers pictures that match the word description then they could draw it also for the one position.
Look at the racket single frame through out seconds 27 and 28. I would characterize that first as racket face facing the sky mostly and then more edge facing the sky. Is that different than Shapovalov?
To do stop action on Youtube use the "
," and "
." keys.
I looked at a Raonic serve and the racket was at about 45 d to the sky.
I see less variety the closer the racket is to impact, particularly at the Big L. At the Big L position the racket is not perfect for facing the sky or edge facing the ball but I have
never seen a high level serve with the face facing the sky at the Big L. I've seen about 45 d. (Some players have the racket facing the sky at some position but not Big L, and still use ISR forcefully, but their technique is different, not high level.)
Another point, I did not invent the Big L but heard about it from somewhere else on the forum I believe. SystemicAnamoly may have know about it? Later, I found the well done Hi-Tech Tennis webpage. I have confidence that in the final approach to the ball - the last 30 milliseconds - the final biomechanics are much less variable - ISR & wrist and racket orientation.
But hundreds of milliseconds before impact or after impact, the players have options. If you want to believe that a particular racket position is significant first study 10 high level servers for some quick stats. Then look into serve types. More servers.