silverwyvern4
Semi-Pro
Did anybody else notice a widespread ratings adjustment in their section on tennis record? For eastern 3.5 and 4.0 men, almost everyone I know was just adjusted down 0.15 to 0.30 on tennis record a few days ago.
I noticed that for my current section and prior section. I actually think they made a change a couple months ago, because it seemed like every week my and others ratings seemed to be ticking up and up, almost like there was a circular reference or something. So I think they may have then reverted back to their prior methodology.Did anybody else notice a widespread ratings adjustment in their section on tennis record? For eastern 3.5 and 4.0 men, almost everyone I know was just adjusted down 0.15 to 0.30 on tennis record a few days ago.
I hope the lower ratings are accurate please....I noticed that for my current section and prior section. I actually think they made a change a couple months ago, because it seemed like every week my and others ratings seemed to be ticking up and up, almost like there was a circular reference or something. So I think they may have then reverted back to their prior methodology.
Specifically for me a week+ ago I had a match rating for a match against a self-rate, who went on to have 3+ matches over the course of the season. So I think they maybe were trying to go back and add match ratings against self-rates, but then that became a circular reference. Now it's back to N/A for that match this week, along with nearly everyone's ratings going back down a fair amount.
It was the opposite up until the last few days I guess. I've noticed most sections slowly going higher and higher over the last couple months. A good 0.15 on average. But I just checked again and everyone's ratings reverted back to what they were awhile ago so like Goku just said maybe they reverted back to an old methodology.Did anybody else notice a widespread ratings adjustment in their section on tennis record? For eastern 3.5 and 4.0 men, almost everyone I know was just adjusted down 0.15 to 0.30 on tennis record a few days ago.
Did anybody else notice a widespread ratings adjustment in their section on tennis record? For eastern 3.5 and 4.0 men, almost everyone I know was just adjusted down 0.15 to 0.30 on tennis record a few days ago.
Does tennis record not take into account tournament matches? Does anyone know why? Mine are rated S even though all of my opponents have computer ratings. Just curious.
Probably because each section treats tournaments differently, they just universally separate themI've wondered that too. They color them green, which is the same color they use for results from leagues that don't count for NTRP ratings. For those "green league" results on my list, they rated some of them but not others, for no obvious reason.
But tournaments do count for NTRP in many areas, including mine, so it is puzzling why they don't treat them like eligible league matches.
Probably because each section treats tournaments differently, they just universally separate them
Good questions. I think the USTA has a cut-off date when they calculate ratings, and whatever scores are recorded for the matches that count on that date is what is used.Does losing 0-6, 0-6 affect your rating the same as losing 0-6, retired?
Also, do scores that are still disputed on the cutoff date still affect the rating?
@schmke
Good questions. I think the USTA has a cut-off date when they calculate ratings, and whatever scores are recorded for the matches that count on that date is what is used.
It has usually been the Sunday of the last day of Adult Nationals. But last year it was the Sunday of the last day of Mixed Nationals. So take your pick 10/30 or 11/13.Does anyone know the cutoff date this year when you need to have 3 matches by to get a computer rating for next year?
Several weeks ago on TR, match ratings were assigned to the "S" matches. Qualified "S" tainted matches are included at year-end; hence assigning match ratings made sense to me. All ratings changed as a result.Did anybody else notice a widespread ratings adjustment in their section on tennis record? For eastern 3.5 and 4.0 men, almost everyone I know was just adjusted down 0.15 to 0.30 on tennis record a few days ago.
If you are self rated with rating around 3.3 on October 31, and your announced new rating on December 1st is 3.5C, can you still get strikes and DQed to 4.0 between December 1st and January 1st, when the new computer rating takes effect?It has usually been the Sunday of the last day of Adult Nationals. But last year it was the Sunday of the last day of Mixed Nationals. So take your pick 10/30 or 11/13.
If you are self rated with rating around 3.3 on October 31, and your announced new rating on December 1st is 3.5C, can you still get strikes and DQed to 4.0 between December 1st and January 1st, when the new computer rating takes effect?
There are Sections where Fall League extends into mid-December, and these are not early-start leagues. Intermountain and SoCal, for instance.If you'll be playing league matches in December that could generate strikes, that'd have to be an early-start 2023 "USTA Adult" league, right?
It's an interesting question. My guess is that if you've played enough rating-eligible matches by the cutoff date to get your first C-rating, then you'd have to immune from DQ strikes during early-start leagues. But I don't know.
As of today, specific "S" matches have again been assigned match ratings. Thus, these rated matches are calculated in the TR rating calcs.Several weeks ago on TR, match ratings were assigned to the "S" matches. Qualified "S" tainted matches are included at year-end; hence assigning match ratings made sense to me. All ratings changed as a result.
Then, after a couple of weeks, this change was undone. The self-rate tainted matches were again assigned an "S" and disregarded in the calculations.
Of course, I don't know if any of the calculations are accurate. I also don't know how much impact the inclusion of the "S" matches has on ratings. I have eight matches that aren't counted. I suspect the inclusion of these matches could move my rating by .02 - .05. But TR bumped my rating my approx. 0.18 with the inclusion!
There are Sections where Fall League extends into mid-December, and these are not early-start leagues. Intermountain and SoCal, for instance.
I still see 1 match vs a S rated player not being assigned a match rating and included in my TR calcs. The S rated player only played 2 league (men's Adult 18+) matches in April and June. Does that mean he didn't play the minimum required matches to garner a dynamic rating? I thought it was 2 not 3?As of today, specific "S" matches have again been assigned match ratings. Thus, these rated matches are calculated in the TR rating calcs.
As of today, specific "S" matches have again been assigned match ratings. Thus, these rated matches are calculated in the TR rating calcs.
In addition to the "S" match inclusion/removal cycle, I've seen dNTRP results at specific time points that made no sense. It appears that "plug figures" are being used, or the algo is seriously flawed. I don't have much faith in TR ratings on an absolute basis. But, on a relative basis, if all comps have a sufficient number of valid data points, the ratings provide some value to me.Purely anecdotal but my rating went up .16 (3.43 to 3.59) during the great boost that lasted a month...then went back down to where it originally was (3.43), then went up again to like 3.51 on the most recent update that included some S matches being assigned ratings, then updated again today and all those matches no longer have ratings assigned and it's back to 3.43. I mostly just want to know if I'm getting bumped to 4.0, but I suppose TR was never going to be super accurate since my section includes tournament play in ratings but TR doesn't. Oh well.
How much did they underrate by? Were 3.3 TR rated people getting bumped to 4.0?TR is underrating a lot of players, but we have been able to observe TR for several years now and underrating is the rule rather than the exception.
How much did they underrate by? Were 3.3 TR rated people getting bumped to 4.0?
Did you have good playoff results?I think TR had me at like 3.4 last year and I got bumped up to 4.0 and outside the appeal range. My buddy was a 3.48 on TR and was able to appeal down(but @schmke ) had him slightly under the bump.
I went winless this year and still don't think I have a shot at being bumped down![]()
How much did they underrate by? Were 3.3 TR rated people getting bumped to 4.0?
Did you have good playoff results?
I think TR heard what you said. They just moved a lot of people up by 0.11 spontaneously.TR is underrating a lot of players, but we have been able to observe TR for several years now and underrating is the rule rather than the exception.
Did they say what source or authority they got the date from?I've heard both 10/30 and 11/13 depending on which USTA person you hear it from
Some are from National, others from Section Coordinators who say they checked with National. So take your pick!Did they say what source or authority they got the date from?
If their is miscommunication, they'll probably have to use November 14th then, to allow more people to get computer ratings. If official told me November 14th so I planned for some of my guys to get their 3rd match in early November, then it turned out to be October 31, I'd be upset.Some are from National, others from Section Coordinators who say they checked with National. So take your pick!
Whether misinformation, miscommunication, or misunderstanding, something is being missed.
Seems like it would be 11/13 since that is the date for completing all the Nationals tournaments- 40+ Mixed is that weekend.I've heard both 10/30 and 11/13 depending on which USTA person you hear it from
In previous years, 2019 and earlier, it was October 31 even though mixed went into mid November.Seems like it would be 11/13 since that is the date for completing all the Nationals tournaments- 40+ Mixed is that weekend.
Correct, well sort of. In past years it was the Sunday of the last Adult (which is usually 55+) Nationals which was generally around the end of October.In previous years, 2019 and earlier, it was October 31 even though mixed went into mid November.
Results from Mixed (MX) matches are not included in Adult League (M or W) ratings. Hence, it seems logical that the Adult rating season ends when the Adult Nationals end (October 30th 2022). But, last year, they did things differently. Of course, last year was unique because the 2020 & 21 seasons were combined because of the lack of play during the pandemic.Seems like it would be 11/13 since that is the date for completing all the Nationals tournaments- 40+ Mixed is that weekend.
As of yesterday afternoon, October 31st, our LC said the season would run through November 13th. I had previously inquired about the end date and received no response. But things suddenly changed yesterday (and too late for me to benefit from it). As expected, the year-end ratings will be available on December 1st or earlier.In previous years, 2019 and earlier, it was October 31 even though mixed went into mid November.
Why is it too late for you?As of yesterday afternoon, October 31st, our LC said the season would run through November 13th. I had previously inquired about the end date and received no response. But things suddenly changed yesterday (and too late for me to benefit from it). As expected, the year-end ratings will be available on December 1st or earlier.
Given my travel schedule and factors out of my control, I don't have any more playing opportunities. If I had known earlier, I could have made changes. The cloak-and-dagger ways of the USTA Adult League are annoying.Why is it too late for you?
Then, didn't you plan your playing around an October 30 deadline?Given my travel schedule and factors out of my control, I don't have any more playing opportunities. If I had known earlier, I could have made changes. The cloak-and-dagger ways of the USTA Adult League are annoying.
Results from Mixed (MX) matches are not included in Adult League (M or W) ratings. Hence, it seems logical that the Adult rating season ends when the Adult Nationals end (October 30th 2022). But, last year, they did things differently. Of course, last year was unique because the 2020 & 21 seasons were combined because of the lack of play during the pandemic.
Perhaps plan to be upset!If their is miscommunication, they'll probably have to use November 14th then, to allow more people to get computer ratings. If official told me November 14th so I planned for some of my guys to get their 3rd match in early November, then it turned out to be October 31, I'd be upset.
Well just to be safe, I'll continue playing my matches left-handed until 11/13 then.I noted earlier that I was told 10/30 is the cut-off, but pretty much everyone else I've heard from said they were told 11/13.
What I heard today is that 10/30 is the cut-off date for matches to count, but 11/13 is the date by which matches have to be entered into TennisLink. Presumably this is the real answer and why two different dates are being mentioned, but if this is true, it seems the meaning of 11/13 was misunderstood and was communicated as the cut-off date incorrectly.
cloak-and-dagger......I noted earlier that I was told 10/30 is the cut-off, but pretty much everyone else I've heard from said they were told 11/13.
What I heard today is that 10/30 is the cut-off date for matches to count, but 11/13 is the date by which matches have to be entered into TennisLink. Presumably this is the real answer and why two different dates are being mentioned, but if this is true, it seems the meaning of 11/13 was misunderstood and was communicated as the cut-off date incorrectly.
Purely anecdotal but my rating went up .16 (3.43 to 3.59) during the great boost that lasted a month...then went back down to where it originally was (3.43), then went up again to like 3.51 on the most recent update that included some S matches being assigned ratings, then updated again today and all those matches no longer have ratings assigned and it's back to 3.43. I mostly just want to know if I'm getting bumped to 4.0, but I suppose TR was never going to be super accurate since my section includes tournament play in ratings but TR doesn't. Oh well.