Official 2022 ratings thread.

I've never heard that players who go to nationals can't appeal. Did you learn that from a back channel or is that explicitly stated somewhere?
Stated in the USTA League regulations:


2.07 CHAMPIONSHIP PLAYERS.
A championship player’s computer rating achieved as a result of play in National Championships may not
be appealed down after the Championship Year it is received except as in Reg. 2.05D Medical Appeals
and Reg. 2.05E Promotion of Players 60 or Over and 65 or Over.
 
I'm counting 19 guys who played for that 4.0 Utah captain who got bumped to 4.5, which does not even include the 4 guys who were already 4.5D. My count includes anyone on his 18+ and 40+ teams from 2020 and 2021.

The 13 I noted were only from the 2021 18+ 4.0 team that won Nationals this year in Surprise, AZ. That team was ridiculous.
 
Stated in the USTA League regulations:


2.07 CHAMPIONSHIP PLAYERS.
A championship player’s computer rating achieved as a result of play in National Championships may not
be appealed down after the Championship Year it is received except as in Reg. 2.05D Medical Appeals
and Reg. 2.05E Promotion of Players 60 or Over and 65 or Over.
Stated in the USTA League regulations:


2.07 CHAMPIONSHIP PLAYERS.
A championship player’s computer rating achieved as a result of play in National Championships may not
be appealed down after the Championship Year it is received except as in Reg. 2.05D Medical Appeals
and Reg. 2.05E Promotion of Players 60 or Over and 65 or Over.
Hm. Do you think you actually have to play at nationals to be subject to that rule or would just getting 3 matches on a team that goes to nationals suffice? Asking for a friend
 
Hm. Do you think you actually have to play at nationals to be subject to that rule or would just getting 3 matches on a team that goes to nationals suffice? Asking for a friend
As worded, it says "play in Nationals Championships" so one wouldn't think just being on the team would qualify you for the appeal exclusion. But I can't say for sure.
 
But, but, but, nothing in the USTA rules is ever poorly worded or confusing!
Shoot, I can't say that someone that played at Nationals couldn't click the appeal button and have it work! It shouldn't work, but it doesn't hurt to try if you want to appeal down. I'm pretty sure there are no demerits on your record if you click appeal and it is denied.
 
Shoot, I can't say that someone that played at Nationals couldn't click the appeal button and have it work! It shouldn't work, but it doesn't hurt to try if you want to appeal down. I'm pretty sure there are no demerits on your record if you click appeal and it is denied.
I hope there aren't. My annual appeal to 3.0 was denied yet again.
 
As worded, it says "play in Nationals Championships" so one wouldn't think just being on the team would qualify you for the appeal exclusion. But I can't say for sure.
I can confirm that one needs to actually *play* a match at Nationals to be ineligible to appeal down. I had one player who was on my 4.0 Nationals team who was successful in appealing back down to 4.0A, and he didn't make the trip to Nationals.
 

The other explanation for this is USTA is giving people what they think they they want. Men want to get rated lower and women want to get rated higher. The problem is this just widens the disparate between men and women, making mixed doubles even more lopsided than this data already showed:

"While there are more permutations with Mixed, the unbalanced pairs when the male is higher rated do tend to win more often, 57-61% of the time."


So now a higher rated male will be even stronger as compared to the female player. Now even if USTA says for mixed doubles the male player should count .5 stronger I am still not sure this would cover the difference. I'm afraid mixed doubles is going to turn into hit at the female player 100% of the time.
 

The other explanation for this is USTA is giving people what they think they they want. Men want to get rated lower and women want to get rated higher. The problem is this just widens the disparate between men and women, making mixed doubles even more lopsided than this data already showed:

"While there are more permutations with Mixed, the unbalanced pairs when the male is higher rated do tend to win more often, 57-61% of the time."


So now a higher rated male will be even stronger as compared to the female player. Now even if USTA says for mixed doubles the male player should count .5 stronger I am still not sure this would cover the difference. I'm afraid mixed doubles is going to turn into hit at the female player 100% of the time.

That's how mixed has always been played. The way to win was always to get a woman who was way out of level.
 

The other explanation for this is USTA is giving people what they think they they want. Men want to get rated lower and women want to get rated higher. The problem is this just widens the disparate between men and women, making mixed doubles even more lopsided than this data already showed:

"While there are more permutations with Mixed, the unbalanced pairs when the male is higher rated do tend to win more often, 57-61% of the time."


So now a higher rated male will be even stronger as compared to the female player. Now even if USTA says for mixed doubles the male player should count .5 stronger I am still not sure this would cover the difference. I'm afraid mixed doubles is going to turn into hit at the female player 100% of the time.
once you get to the Sectional level that is exactly what happens on many teams, team we played at Southern Sectionals, literally the guy told his partner to stand in a corner and not move. Not sure how any can play tennis like that, but guess the power of the plastic trophy is strong.
 
Creighton and JLyon


Now since they bumped up a much larger percentage of females and bumped down a much larger percentage of men this will make mixed doubles even more of mess than it was before.

This artificial divide between men and women rating system does nothing but reduce participation. It makes mixed doubles play worse as mentioned. And I know the whole idea of having coed teams is a bit more complicated, but if they ever do decide that is something they want they are making it harder to transition. It has a few other negative effects as well. I don't see any advantage of widening the divide like they just did this year.
 
I'm afraid mixed doubles is going to turn into hit at the female player 100% of the time.

You don’t say? Lol.

Honestly though, for most women who like mixed, this is a feature not a bug. They want to play a whole doubles match where every shot goes to them and they want to play against a higher level ball than they get to do in regular women’s league. That’s why they sign up for mixed. They are not surprised to see a heavy hitting 4.5 male on the other side of the net in 8.0 mixed. Indeed, that’s what they are hoping for.
 
You don’t say? Lol.

Honestly though, for most women who like mixed, this is a feature not a bug. They want to play a whole doubles match where every shot goes to them and they want to play against a higher level ball than they get to do in regular women’s league. That’s why they sign up for mixed. They are not surprised to see a heavy hitting 4.5 male on the other side of the net in 8.0 mixed. Indeed, that’s what they are hoping for.
This is true. Most I have seen just have a “dump” type volley. Not the right form but because the pace is there they don’t need form. And most knuckle head guys can’t figure out “maybe I should take some pace off the ball and make her do the work”.
 

The other explanation for this is USTA is giving people what they think they they want. Men want to get rated lower and women want to get rated higher. The problem is this just widens the disparate between men and women, making mixed doubles even more lopsided than this data already showed:


I would definitely agree that in my area (mid) with F ladies leagues it appears that they are definitely giving what they want. Usta were extremely reluctant with bumping down - even where is was wildly appropriate .

Personally as a middle of the range player I’m not affected directoy but playing opponents on the line 2 matches who are WAY below the lower threshold of the level is getting a bit tiresome.

I guess I just need to suck it up and really focus my efforts to have more aggressive wins. Bagels and breadsticks are my only hope to progress. Oh well.
 
You don’t say? Lol.

Honestly though, for most women who like mixed, this is a feature not a bug. They want to play a whole doubles match where every shot goes to them and they want to play against a higher level ball than they get to do in regular women’s league. That’s why they sign up for mixed. They are not surprised to see a heavy hitting 4.5 male on the other side of the net in 8.0 mixed. Indeed, that’s what they are hoping for.

Sure it is great for many women (although some females don't like it because they are afraid of getting hit by a fast ball - which I think is also caused by the skill disparate).

In my area the bottle neck is finding men for these teams not women. And in my area there is only one regular men's league, so mixed doubles is about the only USTA game for men in my town! Therefore I bet most of the USTA matches played by men in my county are mixed matches.

Most men and women are not interested in playing people that are way out of level below them especially if they even get denied wins - since their partner is considerably weaker as well.

The considerable gap between rating systems creates most of the issues preventing people from playing mixed doubles. If the ratings were actually the same I think mixed doubles would be much more popular.
 
Hey @schmke did you expect that I would've gotten bumped? I'm quite unhappy being a 5.0 now that there isn't much options to play tennis anymore with my friends in a team.

The USTA can't just let you win forever at 4.5.

Like 6 of the guys on your team in the first match versus intermountain got bumped to 5.0. Seems like you have plenty of friends to play 5.0 with in the future.
 
Actually he was on my fall team, just had three matches and lost all but they were close. He's 60 next year though. I was surprised EH got the appeal but CS got the bump, maybe because of the NTRP championship ?
We thought both were safe, but I wouldn't be surprised if winning that was a factor. Really relieved that EH got the appeal, for obvious selfish reasons, lol.
 
The USTA can't just let you win forever at 4.5.

Like 6 of the guys on your team in the first match versus intermountain got bumped to 5.0. Seems like you have plenty of friends to play 5.0 with in the future.
Ah they're not exactly my close friends (my mixed team is who is mostly 3.5 and 4.0s). Well I was surprised at getting bumped bc I lost most of my matches. The ones I won I didn't feel like they were strong and I had a good partner
 
The USTA can't just let you win forever at 4.5.

Like 6 of the guys on your team in the first match versus intermountain got bumped to 5.0. Seems like you have plenty of friends to play 5.0 with in the future.
damn-ice-cube.gif
 
Ah they're not exactly my close friends (my mixed team is who is mostly 3.5 and 4.0s). Well I was surprised at getting bumped bc I lost most of my matches. The ones I won I didn't feel like they were strong and I had a good partner
That’s what everyone who gets bumped says. Rather than them being weak it usually means you’ve outgrown the level.
 
I've been talking with a lot of guys and seeing posts of more 4.5 bumps to 5.0. Maybe a concious effort by USTA to be able to have enough players to make a bigger/better 5.0 section?
 
I just noticed that the one guy who got bumped up in my age 18+ 3.5 flight had a TR rating of 3.16 and was near the bottom of his team according to that website, lol.
 
Haha I have actually done that before when I broke my wrist and wanted to play lefty. It went so bad I didn't play again.
I thought for a while I was going to have to have elbow surgery this fall. I was planning on contacting the LLCs to see if they would let me create a new account called "Lefty" or something to play left-handed while I recovered. Thankfully, I avoided the surgery and never had to ask for that, but I had already signed up for a 3.0/3.5 level in-house league at my local club, so I've been playing those matches left handed anyway just for fun. I'm like a 3.0 level pusher singles specialist left handed, but I have split sets in all but one of the matches and won a couple. It's an interesting challenge to hit all overhead serves and one handed BHs with your non-dominant hand. My wide, short-angle slice serve to the ad side is almost good enough to start throwing in once a match in my RH matches if I see the returner well behind the baseline. I did it twice in a team practice match against my friends who know I also play LH and they netted the return both times. The key to using it for real is going to be to come up to the line RH and bounce the ball once or twice and then quick switch hands right before I toss. If I do get good enough at it, I guarantee it will win points as long as it's only one per match.
 
I thought for a while I was going to have to have elbow surgery this fall. I was planning on contacting the LLCs to see if they would let me create a new account called "Lefty" or something to play left-handed while I recovered. Thankfully, I avoided the surgery and never had to ask for that, but I had already signed up for a 3.0/3.5 level in-house league at my local club, so I've been playing those matches left handed anyway just for fun. I'm like a 3.0 level pusher singles specialist left handed, but I have split sets in all but one of the matches and won a couple. It's an interesting challenge to hit all overhead serves and one handed BHs with your non-dominant hand. My wide, short-angle slice serve to the ad side is almost good enough to start throwing in once a match in my RH matches if I see the returner well behind the baseline. I did it twice in a team practice match against my friends who know I also play LH and they netted the return both times. The key to using it for real is going to be to come up to the line RH and bounce the ball once or twice and then quick switch hands right before I toss. If I do get good enough at it, I guarantee it will win points as long as it's only one per match.
what kind of elbow surgery? Ulnar collateral ligament? extensor tendon?
 
They were, and I should know. I was the only person at States who played both of them, back to back on day one no less. Lucky me!

I did a little digging and found the two players in question. Interesting enough one of them played Zachary Quo in the Final/Semi of Sectionals. He (the player that beat you 6-0, 6-1) was down 2-6, 3-3 and the match was retired (probably because the other team won).

So, the rabbit hole goes even deeper in 4.5. Zachary Quo lost at USTA 4.5 Nationals in the final against MO Valley's #1 singles player.
 
what kind of elbow surgery? Ulnar collateral ligament? extensor tendon?
Golfer's elbow release surgery. I had golfer's elbow (i.e. tendinitis on the inside of the elbow instead of TE on the outside) really bad starting last fall throughout this summer and none of the regular treatments helped it (i.e. months of rest, PT, cortisone, etc.). I got an MRI on it that showed it was actually starting to get frayed, not just inflamed. I got a PRP injection as a last ditch effort to treat without surgery. I wasn't too optimistic going in, which is why I was making contingencies for at least 6 months of being left handed, but that treatment worked like a miracle. I had to take off 6 weeks after the injection, but it has been 100% better since then. I know people have had varying results with PRP for tennis injuries, but my experience with it with GE was overwhelmingly positive.
 
I've been talking with a lot of guys and seeing posts of more 4.5 bumps to 5.0. Maybe a concious effort by USTA to be able to have enough players to make a bigger/better 5.0 section?

According to Schmke there were many more men being bumped down to 4.5 from 5.0 than the reverse but that is to be expected at these higher levels. I am not sure if it is more than a typical year.

But I agree with your overall view. If people always see getting bumped to 5.0 as the end of USTA play that will cause problems for all the levels. 5.0 guys sandbagging will mean new 4.5 guys get blown out and want to sandbag back to 4.0. That will lead to new 3.5 guys getting blown out etc.
 
Somehow I did not get bumped up despite being undefeated at 4.0 however multiple players on our league team got bumped despite losing a few matches, even going to tiebreaks. This computer is BS. Am I the only one who thinks this years ratings are off by a lot?

Just a few points:

1) Did you not lose a single game or a single match? The ratings look at games perhaps more than match scores.
2) Also the dynamic ratings of your opponents are extremely important. USTA has said it would be "typical" for someone to beat an opponent at the lower end of the same level 6-0 6-0.
3) How close do you think you were to a bump at the beginning of the rating time period? If someone starts the year at 3.49 they will not need that many good results to get the bump to 4.0 as someone that started the year at 3.01.
4) Recent matches may be weighted more strongly but I am not sure of this nor am I sure whether that matters much in a typical year. This time over 2 years it may have had a bigger impact.
 
Just a few points:

1) Did you not lose a single game or a single match? The ratings look at games perhaps more than match scores.
2) Also the dynamic ratings of your opponents are extremely important. USTA has said it would be "typical" for someone to beat an opponent at the lower end of the same level 6-0 6-0.
3) How close do you think you were to a bump at the beginning of the rating time period? If someone starts the year at 3.49 they will not need that many good results to get the bump to 4.0 as someone that started the year at 3.01.
4) Recent matches may be weighted more strongly but I am not sure of this nor am I sure whether that matters much in a typical year. This time over 2 years it may have had a bigger impact.

1) a single match, however most I won in straight sets and even won some 1 and 1, but no bagels, so maybe that matters?
2) I have no clue, I do know most were 4.0 C, however a few were 3.5s playing up.
3) I started at 3.5
4) I did not play last year, but our team advanced to sectionals this year, all things equal, I feel it was certain for me to get bumped, but somehow the people we thought would never get bumped got bumped.

It just feels really weird how the computer chooses to bump people with erratic results and does not bump people who arguably dominated their level
 
1) a single match, however most I won in straight sets and even won some 1 and 1, but no bagels, so maybe that matters?
2) I have no clue, I do know most were 4.0 C, however a few were 3.5s playing up.
3) I started at 3.5
4) I did not play last year, but our team advanced to sectionals this year, all things equal, I feel it was certain for me to get bumped, but somehow the people we thought would never get bumped got bumped.

It just feels really weird how the computer chooses to bump people with erratic results and does not bump people who arguably dominated their level
@Moon Shooter outlined some of the factors, and if you want to DM me your name, I can look and see if my ratings explain why were weren't bumped up.
 
Somehow I did not get bumped up despite being undefeated at 4.0 however multiple players on our league team got bumped despite losing a few matches, even going to tiebreaks. This computer is BS. Am I the only one who thinks this years ratings are off by a lot?
Same thing happened to me. I played only doubles for a team that went to Nationals and didn’t lose a set during the regular season and sectionals. My first loss was the first match of Nationals and then won the rest of my matches. My record for the year was 14-1. Tennis Records had me with a year end rating of a 4.5 medium.
 
Do the new ratings come out on 1 January then? I guess I might have my first actual computer USTA ranking after playing league this year for the first time.
 
Back
Top