My 4 PS 16x19 frames had unstrung unmodded weights at 306, 308, 310 and 310g, all above the spec of 305g but it's not that bad considering Babolat's lack of decent QC. And also considering that all 4 were out of different retailers.Gotcha. Well, you may not have matching material distribution across your frames, but if lead tape works well enough as a band-aid, then awesome -- you saved $700+ and your setup is more than good enough for your needs.
I haven't measured unstrung values, only static weights at home. I believe strung SW was in 325-330 range and balance was nearly identical at 4 points HL then I took it the nearest tennis shop. I got all 4 at SW of 340 and evenly balanced (0 points HL) with a bit of tape, OGs and pete sampras dumps.Yeah, a 4 gram spread actually isn't too bad, especially considering how you sourced them. Any idea what the unstrung balance and swing weights were?
That's wild - I changed over to the Volkl leather, which is my favorite. Seems nice and tacky, but I also don't play with any overgrip.anybody else having this issue with their overgrip on the PSVS? I'm using wilson pro and it keeps slipping out of place after a couple hours of playing. It's definitely off my 2h backhand and I have this same issue with the Yonex Regna and I'm inclined to think this has to do with the leather grip. I have a Pure Drive and APD with various synthetic grips underneath and the same wilson overgrips and don't have this issue.
![]()
The first impression that I had while holding the Babolat leather grip on the PSVS was that it felt pretty cheap and slippery. So your problem doesn't seem too surprising to me. Never had that happen myself though with leather grips. I have a onehander though. I have seen it happening before with 2hbh friends (synthetic base grip).anybody else having this issue with their overgrip on the PSVS? I'm using wilson pro and it keeps slipping out of place after a couple hours of playing. It's definitely off my 2h backhand and I have this same issue with the Yonex Regna and I'm inclined to think this has to do with the leather grip. I have a Pure Drive and APD with various synthetic grips underneath and the same wilson overgrips and don't have this issue.
![]()
It must be the overgrip... I don't have this issue in my frames.anybody else having this issue with their overgrip on the PSVS? I'm using wilson pro and it keeps slipping out of place after a couple hours of playing. It's definitely off my 2h backhand and I have this same issue with the Yonex Regna and I'm inclined to think this has to do with the leather grip. I have a Pure Drive and APD with various synthetic grips underneath and the same wilson overgrips and don't have this issue.
![]()
Wrap it tighter and maybe a hair more overlap.anybody else having this issue with their overgrip on the PSVS? I'm using wilson pro and it keeps slipping out of place after a couple hours of playing. It's definitely off my 2h backhand and I have this same issue with the Yonex Regna and I'm inclined to think this has to do with the leather grip. I have a Pure Drive and APD with various synthetic grips underneath and the same wilson overgrips and don't have this issue.
![]()
Some overgrips have an inner side that is NOT sticky or rubbery enough for leather. I have seen that... I use Tecnifibre, Yonex, Solinco, Diadem... and they grab just fine. The racket comes with a quality leather grip, NO complains on my side.Wrap it tighter and maybe a hair more overlap.
Could also happen if you have multiple racquets in your bag. The grips grab each other and pull around, usually from putting them in and out.
I've only had this issue with basegrips when my hand is sweaty and hot and softens the tape underneath.
I have a frame with Gut/poly combo for days when I need extra power. Works great.Does anyone have a direct comparison to a Vcore Pro 310? Also, how about natural gut/poly hybrids in this frame? I see people have mostly been testing poly with good success but I've grown attached to my 1.25 VS mains with 1.20 Max Power crosses.
A couple pages back I think there was some discussion and comparison to the Vcore Pro 97Does anyone have a direct comparison to a Vcore Pro 310? Also, how about natural gut/poly hybrids in this frame? I see people have mostly been testing poly with good success but I've grown attached to my 1.25 VS mains with 1.20 Max Power crosses.
I still feel like this racquet encourages flat, flat hitting. Which is a bit of a knock.
Would that change if I opted for poly/poly instead? Thinking "aloud".
In response to your next post, all poly at mid or low 40s is good. Maybe you strung the gut/poly too high?
The PSVS is a low-powered frame and I am surprised to hear you say it was harder to swing, I found it very whippy.
I usually use my fingerMaybe QC played a part here? My VCP is noticeably a bit more head light in comparison just holding the rackets with a pen by the throat and seeing how they balances (VERY scientific approach).
Glad to see you are still using my hack for stringing gut/polyThat's interesting because a gut/poly hybrid works fine. Well, for me at least?
I've got Klip Legend 1.30 mains, Tecnifibre Razor Code 1.25 crosses, at 55/51.
I still feel like this racquet encourages flat, flat hitting. Which is a bit of a knock.
Would that change if I opted for poly/poly instead? Thinking "aloud".
I recommend dusting the leather grip with spray adhesive before applying the overgrip. I used to do this for Lendl and it works wonders. Makes for a little bit of cleanup between grippings, but nothing major. There are a bunch of different brands that all work fine, loctite, elmers, 3m etc.anybody else having this issue with their overgrip on the PSVS? I'm using wilson pro and it keeps slipping out of place after a couple hours of playing. It's definitely off my 2h backhand and I have this same issue with the Yonex Regna and I'm inclined to think this has to do with the leather grip. I have a Pure Drive and APD with various synthetic grips underneath and the same wilson overgrips and don't have this issue.
![]()
Thin poly at mid-40s is definitely a good recipe for it. Also do you have a more vertical (spin) stroke? I think it is a lot more technique centric with this frame, much like 18x20 frames.I'm quite surprised by the comments about the PSVS lacking spin. I'm playing mine all at 335g, 31.8 cm, 324 SW with Hawk Touch 1.20 at 47/45 and I get lots of easy spin out of this setup. Tried a few other strings in it too which I also didn't experience any lack of spin with. But of course everyone has different experiences with a racquet.
@Sahbatage I think I commented that in my original review, almost plays more like an 18x20 than a 16x19 as far as spin is concerned.
But yes, shaped poly strung lower should up the spin and give a little more net clearance.
Encouraging flat hitting doesn't necessarily mean it lacks spin. I'd say flat hitting is where it shines the most.
That being said, I think my VCP 9HD has easier access to spin than my PS VS; but as you suggested YMMV.
Thin poly at mid-40s is definitely a good recipe for it. Also do you have a more vertical (spin) stroke? I think it is a lot more technique centric with this frame, much like 18x20 frames.
I hit a little flatter, so for me it is not a spin monster and doesn't have the launch angle of a 16x19
I feel torn between PS 18x20 gen3 and PSVS. Already demoing these two for the second time. If only these two can be combined in one racket PS 18x20 shines on groundies and very aggressive hitting, great spin access despite tight pattern and it also doesn't require any mods if you are lucky to get a stick close to 305g/330SW specs. PSVS surprisingly shines on serving, volleying and defensive game. Slices, dropshots are awesome with it too. This frame needs a lot of weight at 12 though. The feel of these two is quite different as well, I feel better connected to PS 18x20 on big groundies while PSVS allows me to hit amazing defensive slices and feel shots. So freaking tornEncouraging flat hitting doesn't necessarily mean it lacks spin. I'd say flat hitting is where it shines the most.
That being said, I think my VCP 9HD has easier access to spin than my PS VS; but as you suggested YMMV.
Mine was under spec by 4-5 grams, which worked out because mine is super-maneuverable but just lacked some put away power. What I notice about the PSVS is that it is a complete control oriented racket without the mods, even lacking power against aggressive heavy hitters. However, a little additional weight (*4grams @ 12) turns the control oriented frame into a scalpel-like weapon with put away power. I used to hit my hardest shots with the Pure Strike Tour, but I’m hitting harder and more accurate shots with the modded PSVS. It is a great frame.Took measurements and it looks like mine, while only about 1.5g over spec in static weight, has a 32.5cm balance point and has a 332 swingweight, stock. No wonder it swings the way it does vs the demo I tried. Thanks Babolat QC lol. Not far off from my GPros but for whatever reason feels noticeably less maneuverable. Guess I’ll have to try adding weight to the handle.
Appreciate your perspective! I imagine mine has a bit more weight in the head already thus the high stock swingweight. I just added 8g of blu tac to the handle and it is now 31.5cm balance and feels much more “right” to swing. It stands out for me so far vs other frames I’ve been hitting precisely for the reasons you’re mentioning. I feel like I have a ton of control and a big part of that is the feel. Excited to get on court with this tomorrow.Mine was under spec by 4-5 grams, which worked out because mine is super-maneuverable but just lacked some put away power. What I notice about the PSVS is that it is a complete control oriented racket without the mods, even lacking power against aggressive heavy hitters. However, a little additional weight (*4grams @ 12) turns the control oriented frame into a scalpel-like weapon with put away power. I used to hit my hardest shots with the Pure Strike Tour, but I’m hitting harder and more accurate shots with the modded PSVS. It is a great frame.
You’ll have to write a little vc95 vs psvs pleaseAppreciate your perspective! I imagine mine has a bit more weight in the head already thus the high stock swingweight. I just added 8g of blu tac to the handle and it is now 31.5cm balance and feels much more “right” to swing. It stands out for me so far vs other frames I’ve been hitting precisely for the reasons you’re mentioning. I feel like I have a ton of control and a big part of that is the feel. Excited to get on court with this tomorrow.
Will do! I’ll try to include the 2018 too hahaYou’ll have to write a little vc95 vs psvs please![]()
Awesome. I am actually really looking forward to getting one that's on or under spec, because mine had strung specs of 334g and 332 swing weight and 32.5 cm balance, stock! So the only place for me to put weight was in the handle. It feels more sluggish than my Blade Pro but I'm really taken with the feel and accuracy of the PSVS even at this spec. I find that it encourages me to use a bit more variety, like with the 93P because of the feel and touch. I know I'd struggle a bit in a match situation where things speed up so it'll be nice to have a platform racquet to build on and tweak. I hate to spend on matched sticks now before I'm fully decided but I find myself picking the PSVS over others at the moment even for the paintjob alone.@naturalexponent - To add to that perspective, I ended up customizing my playest PSVS with about 10g extra around the handle (built up the #2 grip to a #4, roughly), 2g at 6 and 3g at 12, for a strung spec of 334g, 31.1cm (10pt HL) and 321SW. Strung with Mayami Big Spin 1.25 mains and T1 Ghostwire 1.22 crosses at 54/51 (lockout), so like 51/48 on an eCP. My sister was so taken by it, she ended up up buying it off me, and she's now playing some of her best tennis ever, so it's clearly a very universal platform stick.
Awesome. I am actually really looking forward to getting one that's on or under spec, because mine had strung specs of 334g and 332 swing weight and 32.5 cm balance, stock! So the only place for me to put weight was in the handle. It feels more sluggish than my Blade Pro but I'm really taken with the feel and accuracy of the PSVS even at this spec. I find that it encourages me to use a bit more variety, like with the 93P because of the feel and touch. I know I'd struggle a bit in a match situation where things speed up so it'll be nice to have a platform racquet to build on and tweak. I hate to spend on matched sticks now before I'm fully decided but I find myself picking the PSVS over others at the moment even for the paintjob alone.
That’s great to hear, as I loved the MP-L and was prepared to make the switch if not for some elbow discomfort@naturalexponent - Yeah, if you can front the cash for 2+, I would definitely go the TW matching route to ensure you get one at or under spec. It's a special platform frame when QC is on-point. That and the Prestige MP-L are two of the best platform frames out right now, IMHO.
You can suspect if you wish. The only reason I bothered to even measure it is because it felt so noticeably off and cumbersome. I calibrated and confirmed via Briffidi multiple times. Just a few grams at the tip can account for large variation in SW, and the PSVS has stated variance of +/- 7 across specs so I don’t see why your personal exp is contradictory. Both things can be true that yours all came in under 316 (below TW published spec btw) while mine is over 330...something makes me suspicious of your SW values. My feeling is that the measurement is way wrong.
Exp: I got several frames to test, 6 so far and NONE came strung above 316. I calibrate my machine and is checked often for precision.
It is a fun racket to customize for advanced players.
I cannot speak for TW calibrations. Specs means just that... not reality.You can suspect if you wish. The only reason I bothered to even measure it is because it felt so noticeably off and cumbersome. I calibrated and confirmed via Briffidi multiple times. Just a few grams at the tip can account for large variation in SW, and the PSVS has stated variance of +/- 7 across specs so I don’t see why your personal exp is contradictory. Both things can be true that yours all came in under 316 (below TW published spec btw) while mine is over 330.
Yes, my calibrated measurements reflect the reality of my racquet and are independent of your experience with yours. Don’t want to derail this thread any further, so hope we can leave it at that.I cannot speak for TW calibrations. Specs means just that... not reality.
So either your racket is an outlier and Babolat QC is bad, or the wide spec range is what we should live with.Yes, my calibrated measurements reflect the reality of my racquet and are independent of your experience with yours. Don’t want to derail this thread any further, so hope we can leave it at that.
Agree with the former! I think a lot of people here would agree that Bab QC is not the best (same with Wilson) and would wish more brands would be like Yonex.So either your racket is an outlier and Babolat QC is bad, or the wide spec range is what we should live with.
That is not good and Babolat should do better than that, like Yonex.
I am quite confident that Yonex success in popularity is due to their QC.Agree with the former! I think a lot of people here would agree that Bab QC is not the best (same with Wilson) and would wish more brands would be like Yonex.
Agree and agree. Yonex QC is absolutely unprecedented. And I played with 15+ different Yonex frames last 25 years. I always thought that my serve is fine, never been an issue/weakness due to massive kick. But hitting a couple of flat bombs with one of the most controlled Babolat frame Pure Strike 18x20 changed my mind 180. Now my serve is a WEAPON and I also dig the unique feel of Pure Strikes 3rd gen, not too muted not to harsh just right IMO. I couldn't gel with PSVS though despite spending two weeks of testing it against 2 sets of different frames, different feel slightly flexy and not as spiny as advertised tbh. Also needs a bunch of weight at 12. Boring but I ended up switching from PS 16x19 gen 3 to PS 18x20 gen 3!I am quite confident that Yonex success in popularity is due to their QC.
Personally, not fonded of their head shapes, not my preference because how I swing... I need a rounded head top even on serves.
This Babolat VS is quite close to what I needed, and is customizable to make it efficient for my game...which have improved in consistency and pleasure.
Yeah, your assesment is similar to mine. The problem is me, the PS gives me power and the 16x19 lotta spin capability and the 18x20 add consistency but not enough spin when I need.Agree and agree. Yonex QC is absolutely unprecedented. And I played with 15+ different Yonex frames last 25 years. I always thought that my serve is fine, never been an issue/weakness due to massive kick. But hitting a couple of flat bombs with one of the most controlled Babolat frame Pure Strike 18x20 changed my mind 180. Now my serve is a WEAPON and I also dig the unique feel of Pure Strikes 3rd gen, not too muted not to harsh just right IMO. I couldn't gel with PSVS though despite spending two weeks of testing it against 2 sets of different frames, different feel slightly flexy and not as spiny as advertised tbh. Also needs a bunch of weight at 12. Boring but I ended up switching from PS 16x19 gen 3 to PS 18x20 gen 3!
I was surprised to find out that I can generate more spin with 18x20 frames opposed to common belief of "closed" vs "open" string patterns. It's been the same experience comparing Blades, VCore Pros and Pure Strikes 16x19 vs 18x20. The reason is simple: 18x20 gives me confidence to swing as fast and as big as I like and I'm getting rewarded with extra spin and ball dipping like crazy on baseline and sidelines. And 16x19 (or 16x20) generally feel too powerful and too easy to overhit thus less acceleration, less spin and sadly less confidence overall. Also I can string 18x20 frames at 53-54 lbs as opposed to high 50s I have to go to with 16x19.Yeah, your assesment is similar to mine. The problem is me, the PS gives me power and the 16x19 lotta spin capability and the 18x20 add consistency but not enough spin when I need.
So, since I don't feel I need more power with my full swing strokes but rather to control my crazy brain, when I tune it to my specs I landed happily in the PSVS. BTW... gentle which saves my arm strung poly at 55-56# and the 97in^2 is closer to the 96 I used to play in Tecni TFight Ltd.
So things are there for me so far. One complain is price, when you need several frames... Ouch.