christos_liaskos
Professional
Dont know if this new rule is for the WTA as well as the ATP but they have been talking about it on the coverage for Doha. It basically sounds like that if you want any medical treatment then it has to be taken in the time during the change over yet the old 3 minute medical time out can no longer be taken. The reasoning behind it is of course to speed up the game and also to stop players using to break up their opponent rhythm.
While they might sound like good reasons I dont really see them as being a problem, especially not on the ATP tour. I'm sure some fingers will pointed at certain players who have used this rule more for sportsmanship rather than actually needing medical attention but I would say 90% of the time it's genuine. The WTA however may be another matter. Especially on the WTA tour it seems to me that something has to be done about the toilet break rule, that is constantly abused!
Also, I thought the reason the medical time out rule was brought in in the first place was after the Japanese player, Shuzo Matsuoka seized up with full body cramps at the USO in the 90's and no one could do anything to help him, he just layed there. So by getting rid of the rule are we not going back to where this situation is allowed to happen again? Or have I not heard all the exact changes that have been made?
So do you guys think it's a good or bad thing that they have changed the rule?
While they might sound like good reasons I dont really see them as being a problem, especially not on the ATP tour. I'm sure some fingers will pointed at certain players who have used this rule more for sportsmanship rather than actually needing medical attention but I would say 90% of the time it's genuine. The WTA however may be another matter. Especially on the WTA tour it seems to me that something has to be done about the toilet break rule, that is constantly abused!
Also, I thought the reason the medical time out rule was brought in in the first place was after the Japanese player, Shuzo Matsuoka seized up with full body cramps at the USO in the 90's and no one could do anything to help him, he just layed there. So by getting rid of the rule are we not going back to where this situation is allowed to happen again? Or have I not heard all the exact changes that have been made?
So do you guys think it's a good or bad thing that they have changed the rule?
Last edited: