Official Nike Lunar Ballistec Thread

Discussion in 'Shoes and Apparel' started by anhuynh16, Jan 2, 2014.

  1. niktub

    niktub Professional

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2006
    Messages:
    916
    Serious, no?
     
  2. Ramon

    Ramon Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2011
    Messages:
    4,170
    Location:
    Florida
    Even Nike reps are admitting now that Lunarlon breaks down. Maybe that's why they don't make a durable outsole for it! Lol
     
  3. Fintft

    Fintft Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2007
    Messages:
    3,865
    Dunno, might never broke down and I started to like more then the previous air ballistec models (4.3 etc)
     
  4. Ramon

    Ramon Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2011
    Messages:
    4,170
    Location:
    Florida
    Nike's own cushioning innovation director says Lunarlon breaks down. That's why they are combining it with Zoom now.
    http://www.si.com/nba/2015/04/03/investigating-sneaker-cushioning-nike-adidas-jordan (see the section on Lunarlon)

    Even on the Nike forums they trash Lunarlon. About the only good thing they say about Lunarlon is it's good for casual wear. I would take that as a backhanded compliment.
    http://niketalk.com/t/622189/zoom-vs-lunarlon
     
    Last edited: Dec 17, 2016
    Fanman likes this.
  5. Tuskarr

    Tuskarr Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2014
    Messages:
    567
    Location:
    Texas, USA
    lunarlon is a pretty basic set up, which is why it was always a slap in the face to stick it in that shoe and price it at $165.
     
  6. Fintft

    Fintft Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2007
    Messages:
    3,865
    Even $200!

    I hunt for sales for mine, under 100, be it funky colors, but they are getting harder to find.
     
  7. teckid

    teckid Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2008
    Messages:
    158
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    Are these really getting retired? If so how soon? Is there anything past the tart color that’s already on clearance (and all white)? Is there a USO black/red?

    As many issues as this shoe has I’ve grown to rely on them for stability and comfort for extended training.
     
  8. ArliHawk

    ArliHawk Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2012
    Messages:
    2,599
    No replacement, just phased out. Nadal to endorse Cage 3 which is supposed to be more of a universal fit.
     
  9. teckid

    teckid Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2008
    Messages:
    158
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    Thanks.

    No USO version?
     
  10. David Le

    David Le Professional

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2015
    Messages:
    1,214
    Location:
    USA
    There's a USO version coming out.
     
  11. teckid

    teckid Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2008
    Messages:
    158
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    Thanks, helps me figure out a plan to stockpile. Not sure the Cage 3 or the new Resistance is going to cut it as a replacement. Would love for Nike to bring back at least one Air Max model or one full length (or heel AND forefoot) zoom model.
     
  12. teckid

    teckid Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2008
    Messages:
    158
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    *Ultra React excluded, the single separate forefoot pod is not comparable to the full width forefoot zoom of older models.
     
  13. David Le

    David Le Professional

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2015
    Messages:
    1,214
    Location:
    USA
    The cage 3 is it's only replacement. The resistance is just a Nike budget end of a shoe. Like the Air Zoom Ultra.
     
  14. Fanman

    Fanman New User

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2017
    Messages:
    23
    Location:
    Glendale, CA
    That's too bad. I have several pairs of the LB. Unless they change the fit of the Cage it isn't the same as the LB. Where the LB is more like a medium to slightly wide fit, the Cage was very roomy on my fit. Unfortunately the new Zoom React line seems to be a replacement, but it seems so stiff in the forefoot. Might have to go to the Vapors.
     
  15. David Le

    David Le Professional

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2015
    Messages:
    1,214
    Location:
    USA
    I heard the Cage 3 are a slightly wide. The Zoom React is okay fit. Wide enough for my feet. That one I consider as a replacement for the Lunars but I'm stocking up some Lunars before it's out of production.
     
  16. ArliHawk

    ArliHawk Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2012
    Messages:
    2,599
    Hope the Cage 3 is less wide than the Cage 2.
     
  17. David Le

    David Le Professional

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2015
    Messages:
    1,214
    Location:
    USA
    Didn't like the Cage 2. The length of kinda too short for me even after a slight break in. At least that one wasn't as bad as the Barricade 8+. I felt like the B8+ jammed my toes a lot. The only Adidas pair I've ever tried.
     
  18. Fanman

    Fanman New User

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2017
    Messages:
    23
    Location:
    Glendale, CA
    A lot of their other technology such as Max Air & Shox don't really fit in the area of tennis shoes. I like the feel of their Lunarlon in the LB but as you & others have stated it would be great if they had included Zoom Air in the LB line as it's a premium, top of the line shoe of their tennis line. If they had Lunarlon + front & rear Zoom Air in the LB, then Zoom Air in the Cage & Vapors it would make more sense in categorizing their line. Lunarlon is similar to Adiprene+ or Bounce in Adidas or Charged Cushioning in UA, etc. Just in a $180-$200 shoe it should have Nike's kitchen sink thrown in it.
     
  19. Ramon

    Ramon Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2011
    Messages:
    4,170
    Location:
    Florida
    You make some good points. A $200 shoe should definitely have their best technology, although I'm not sure that all the players at the pro level want Zoom because they value court feel. Maybe one of those tiny Zoom units buried in the heel would work for them, but that's really like having no Zoom at all. It would be more "fair" if Nike priced the LB's the $100-120 range but that's not happening. One thing they are good at is asking as much as they can get.
     
  20. teckid

    teckid Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2008
    Messages:
    158
    Location:
    Austin, TX

    CB 4.3 technically had Air Max and lunar in forefoot. Air Max did well in tennis from the Spa2 in mid 90s thru 2014 with the Cage that had Air Max. Not the best for everyone but nice to have that option. (Delpo and Nadal still prefer those soles)
     
  21. Fanman

    Fanman New User

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2017
    Messages:
    23
    Location:
    Glendale, CA
    Yeah when has Nike ever made a shoe line LESS expensive ?!? Haha. I also use the Vapor's & do not notice any loss of court feel w/ the Zoom Air so I think they could've at least added the rear unit, but I think that was Nike's attempt to delineate the lines a bit...Vapors w/ Zoom Air, LB w/ Lunarlon, but given the higher cost/premium of the Ballistecs they should have done more w/ the line.
     
  22. Fanman

    Fanman New User

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2017
    Messages:
    23
    Location:
    Glendale, CA
    Yeah, the Zoom Air is supposed the next advancement in their air line, hence the phasing out of the Air Max technology. Though the Air Max gives better cushioning than the Zoom Air line I know the knock on it was that it wasn't nearly as stable & when I used to work in a shoe store many people brought them back because it popped/durability issue.
     

Share This Page