I honestly think he shouldn't be removed as his personal life shouldn't reflect his achievements on court. Sure, what he did is unthinkable and unforgivable and shouldn't be a part of anyone's life but for the sole reason of it going out over what he did on court, I refuse to sign this.
I honestly think he shouldn't be removed as his personal life shouldn't reflect his achievements on court. Sure, what he did is unthinkable and unforgivable and shouldn't be a part of anyone's life but for the sole reason of it going out over what he did on court, I refuse to sign this.
Should we wait until after the trial?
Or should we just lynch him now?
Is this actually going to court?
Statutes of limitation would probably bar any civil or criminal proceeding at this point.
Statutes of limitation would probably bar any civil or criminal proceeding at this point.
tell that to Jerry Sandusky.
Signed. This guy needs to be removed from the HOF.
If that's true, then so does Bill Tilden.
If that's true, then so does Bill Tilden.
You had to go there!
Yes, I did. Bob Hewitt is being accused of molesting teenagers. Bill Tilden was tried and convicted of molesting teenagers. TWICE.
If that's true, then so does Bill Tilden.
There's one reason as to why I won't sign. Tilden was convicted, spent some time yet he still got inducted based on his tennis. Sure, apart from genocide the worst thing one can commit IMO is sexual abuse towards children, but if Bill's not thrown out, why Bob?
What else would Bill Tilden have been inducted on the basis of? Because he had been an exemplary husband and father of 2.5 children?
He's never going to be "thrown out".
Tilden was convicted twice and went to jail on both occasions.
With Hewitt, throwing him out of the hof might be the only chance of
some kind of ´conviction´ that his victims might get.
Hewitt has the right to a very thorough investigation though, and to defend himself should he choose to.
His victims could bring charges against him.
Tilden was convicted twice and went to jail on both occasions.
With Hewitt, throwing him out of the hof might be the only chance of
some kind of ´conviction´ that his victims might get.
Hewitt has the right to a very thorough investigation though, and to defend himself should he choose to.
I have already covered this. With possible criminal and civil action pending, he can't defend himself without compromising his defense in court. No lawyer of his, in his right mind would let him testify at such hearings with any specificity to allegations.
Yes, because his personal life including molestation of pre-teen children should be excluded when considering placing him in a hall of fame. Yes, that makes perfect sense. I agree entirely with this petition. I don't care how great your sports ability is, because your entire character is ruined when allegations such as these come out.I honestly think he shouldn't be removed as his personal life shouldn't reflect his achievements on court. Sure, what he did is unthinkable and unforgivable and shouldn't be a part of anyone's life but for the sole reason of it going out over what he did on court, I refuse to sign this.
Yes, because his personal life including molestation of pre-teen children should be excluded when considering placing him in a hall of fame. Yes, that makes perfect sense. I agree entirely with this petition. I don't care how great your sports ability is, because your entire character is ruined when allegations such as these come out.
Well isn't Hewitt inducted based on his tennis as well? It kind of gets a bit murky to me...
Do you mean that Bob Hewitt has been convicted of molesting children, or that certain people, including alleged victims, have only said he did so? Because you can allege that someone did something without it's actually being true. Allegations can cause great damage to a person's character, but they don't stand up in a court of law.
One difference is that Bill Tilden didn't try to use _tennis_ to find adolescent partners -- he merely gave them expensive gifts. He had many young tennis students, but all of them claimed he kept the relationship professional and never touched them.Yes, I did. Bob Hewitt is being accused of molesting teenagers. Bill Tilden was tried and convicted of molesting teenagers. TWICE.
You have a very short memory.
Uh, I just gave one reason right above your post. Tilden's sex life was kept separate from his tennis. Hewitt, in contrast, traded on his position in the tournament tennis community to fish in those waters.Generally there is no statute of limitations with respect to r.a.p.e.. What am I missing here?
Tilden was convicted.
Conviction>allegations.
This does not excuse Hewitt, but why the double standard?
Generally there is no statute of limitations with respect to r.a.p.e.. What am I missing here?
Tilden was convicted.
Conviction>allegations.
This does not excuse Hewitt, but why the double standard?
I honestly think he shouldn't be removed as his personal life shouldn't reflect his achievements on court. Sure, what he did is unthinkable and unforgivable and shouldn't be a part of anyone's life but for the sole reason of it going out over what he did on court, I refuse to sign this.
That's not true. But, more importantly, there was in virtually every jurisdiction 30 years ago. As for Tilden, I don't know what he was convicted of. But, IMO, for HOF purposes, statutory **** of a consenting older teen is far less offensive than forcible **** of a young teen or pre-teen.
The whole concept of statutory R.A.P.E. is that the YOUTH is not of an age to CONSENT.
So, Tilden R.A.P.E.D. children as did Hewitt.
Class acts, neither of them.
You're confusing law with morality. Just because the law uses the same word to refer to two different kinds of acts, or even punishes them the same, doesn't mean the two acts are morally equivalent. (And, so far as I know, Tilden's acts were limited to "heavy petting".)The whole concept of statutory R.A.P.E. is that the YOUTH is not of an age to CONSENT.
So, Tilden R.A.P.E.D. children as did Hewitt.
Class acts, neither of them.
The whole concept of statutory R.A.P.E. is that the YOUTH is not of an age to CONSENT.
So, Tilden R.A.P.E.D. children as did Hewitt.
Class acts, neither of them.