One-Piece vs, Two-Piece String Jobs

NightBandit

New User
If I'm not stringing a hybrid, is there any advantage at all of stringing my racquet with a two-piece string job rather than a one-piece string job? Or should I just always do a one-piece string job?

Thank you,

NightBandit
 
Yes please, I would like some advice on the same issue as well, particulary because I am terrible at tying knots, way too much tension loss on the end strings, even though I have read that it doesn't matter I feel it could be tighter. thanks!
 
I've always thought that two pieces were easier to do than one-pieces.

For the record I haven't bothered with learning how to do a one piece yet :p It's on my to do list however
 

Dan007

Hall of Fame
actually one piece isn't harder than two piece once you know the method, but its a pain to work with long strings and kinks a lot.
 

psp2

Banned
Pros/cons:

One piece job:
>Pros:
1. 2 knots;
2. more uniform tension on tie-off string (less tension loss due to less knots);
3. no starting/anchor knots.

>Cons:
1. pulling longside during main install;
2. forced to string Bottom > Top on certain frames/patterns unless ATW/Box pattern is used;
3. possible hard weaves during ATW/Box patterns.

Two piece job:
>Pros:
1. less string to pull during main install;
2. hybrid capable;
3. always able to string crosses Top > Bottom;

>Cons:
1. starting/anchor knot needed
2. 4 knots
3. some frames require a starting clamp (eg., Babolat PStorm/Control)
4. tension loss due to 4 knots

I'm sure more stringers will chime in.....
 

Bud

Bionic Poster
Pros/cons:

One piece job:
>Pros:
1. 2 knots;
2. more uniform tension on tie-off string (less tension loss due to less knots);
3. no starting/anchor knots.

>Cons:
1. pulling longside during main install;
2. forced to string Bottom > Top on certain frames/patterns unless ATW/Box pattern is used;
3. possible hard weaves during ATW/Box patterns.

Two piece job:
>Pros:
1. less string to pull during main install;
2. hybrid capable;
3. always able to string crosses Top > Bottom;

>Cons:
1. starting/anchor knot needed
2. 4 knots
3. some frames require a starting clamp (eg., Babolat PStorm/Control)
4. tension loss due to 4 knots

I'm sure more stringers will chime in.....

PSP, why does a Babolat PS/Control require a starting clamp?
 

psp2

Banned
PSP, why does a Babolat PS/Control require a starting clamp?

...b/c the cross tieoff is on the 3rd cross (not on a main). You need a starting clamp so you can weave the first several crosses (I do 4), then tieoff at the 11 H.

BPSTRM-5.JPG


Can you see the cross tieoff hole (3rd grommet from the left on the top photo)? That's the cross tieoff hole which is the 3rd cross.
 

Bud

Bionic Poster
...b/c the cross tieoff is on the 3rd cross (not on a main). You need a starting clamp so you can weave the first several crosses (I do 4), then tieoff at the 11 H.

BPSTRM-5.JPG


Can you see the cross tieoff hole (3rd grommet from the left on the top photo)? That's the cross tieoff hole which is the 3rd cross.

Ah, IC.

Can you anchor the cross on one of the mains further up the head? Is there room in any other holes?

Sometimes, I'll use another hole that is easily accessible to tie off a main, cross or anchor a cross.
 

NightBandit

New User
Thanks for your help guys.

Let me re-phrase my question a little: From a playability standpoint, is there any difference between a one-piece and a two-piece string job?

Thanks,

NightBandit
 

GPB

Professional
Stringing 2-piece also gives the option of using different tensions, even without using a true hybrid.
 

TennezSport

Hall of Fame
2 Piece as a standard...........

We use the 2 piece stringing technique here as our standard process because of the number of Hybrid jobs we get today. So ALL racquets are now done 2 piece unless the customer requests otherwise or the manufacturer states 1 piece only. We always string head to throat; no exceptions and in the case of a 1 piece request, if the mains end at the throat we use a ATW pattern.

Our 2 piece stringing process is always the same starting with the mains and increasing the tension on the last mains by 10% to minimize any tension loss from the knots. The crosses always start at the head with a starting clamp and complete at the throat. This allows us to increase the tension on the first and last cross by 10% as we do with the mains for the knots, and all knots are Parnell knots, which delivers a clean, small but effective knot with the tail against the frame.

So far, our string bed(SB) tests show that there is no difference in a 1 or 2 piece job if done this way.

Cheers, TennezSport :cool:
 

jim e

Legend
All other things being equal, one piece stringing should produce a slightly tighter stringbed.

DH

David, why do you say that? If you tie a good cinched up knot, and increase the tie off string tension, there should be no difference.I usually use the knot button and that as you know is 10% increase.(When I pluck the end main, it has a higher pitch than the second to last one , and sounds just where it should.I know some of the slam stringers increases the tie off anywheres from 3-5kgs. which is a substantial amount, so there should be no tension loss, therefore all things being equal there should be no difference.
 

davidahenry

Professional
David, why do you say that? If you tie a good cinched up knot, and increase the tie off string tension, there should be no difference.I usually use the knot button and that as you know is 10% increase.(When I pluck the end main, it has a higher pitch than the second to last one , and sounds just where it should.I know some of the slam stringers increases the tie off anywheres from 3-5kgs. which is a substantial amount, so there should be no tension loss, therefore all things being equal there should be no difference.

I guess I was thinking that if you string one piece and don't increase the tension on the last main and cross OR string two piece and don't increase the tension on the last mains and crosses, the one piece job would be slightly (slightly being the key word) tighter - simply due to the fact that you may lose a little bit of tension when tying off four times as opposed to two.

Could be flawed logic - as I am still learning. :confused:

DH
 
Last edited:

psp2

Banned
Ah, IC.

Can you anchor the cross on one of the mains further up the head? Is there room in any other holes?

Sometimes, I'll use another hole that is easily accessible to tie off a main, cross or anchor a cross.

I just strung a friend's PStorm Tour with a hybrid. The answer to your question is a NO. Grommet holes for the last few mains are too small. You *could* enlarge a hold using an awl, but that's the only way, IMO.
 
D

Deleted member 25923

Guest
Pros/cons:

One piece job:
>Pros:
1. 2 knots;
2. more uniform tension on tie-off string (less tension loss due to less knots);
3. no starting/anchor knots.

>Cons:
1. pulling longside during main install;
2. forced to string Bottom > Top on certain frames/patterns unless ATW/Box pattern is used;
3. possible hard weaves during ATW/Box patterns.

Two piece job:
>Pros:
1. less string to pull during main install;
2. hybrid capable;
3. always able to string crosses Top > Bottom;

>Cons:
1. starting/anchor knot needed
2. 4 knots
3. some frames require a starting clamp (eg., Babolat PStorm/Control)
4. tension loss due to 4 knots

I'm sure more stringers will chime in.....

Also, one piece gets tangled easier, but uses less string.
 
Top