Connors went twice, won it once, and made the final the second Through the first half of the 70s given most of the top players were Australian it was pretty well attended. It was only really 5/6 years where it was truly a nothing tournament (prestige wise, it obviously still had less prize money and fewer rankings points even after guys started going).Well several top players like Borg or Connors still never got a chance.
You were replying to mattennis who asked about players who won the US Open and then the Australian Open 4 months later.
Wilander in 88
Federer in 04, 06, 07
Djokovic in 11, 15, 23
Even rarer is AO, USO, YEC triple
Federer in 04, 06, 07
Djokovic in 11, 15, 23
Can Sinner join this very elite group?
The USTA should be too for making such a lopsided draw in favor of their favorite player last year.Novak had zero business doing that in 2023. The tour should be ashamed lol
Nole is hard court GOAT by a mile. Roger is second.4+ HC big titles in a season (since 1988, the year AO became HC):
Wilander 1988 4
Agassi 1995 4
Fed 2004 5, 2005 4, 2006 7, 2007 4, 2017 4,
Nole 2011 5, 2012 5, 2013 4, 2014 4, 2015 7, 2016 4, 2023 5
Rafa 2013 4
Murray 2016 4
5+ HC big titles in a season has been achieved only 6 times, Nole (4) and Fed (2).
Top HC rivalries:
1.Nole-Fed 32
2.Nole-Murray 25
3.Nole-Rafa 23
4.Fed-Rafa 19
5.Fed-Murray 18
6.Pete-Agassi 15
10.Connors-Lendl 14
Sinner 2024 3*(ongoing)
Not saying it's meaningless, just that many top players then could have archieved this but couldn't.Connors went twice, won it once, and made the final the second Through the first half of the 70s given most of the top players were Australian it was pretty well attended. It was only really 5/6 years where it was truly a nothing tournament (prestige wise, it obviously still had less prize money and fewer rankings points even after guys started going).
But yes, I take your point. It was a long way to travel at an awkward time of year for less reward, and not winning it then doesn't mean much to a legacy.
Still, we've got over 30 years now of it being top-level, so to point stuff like this out is not exactly meaningless. We've almost reached a point where there are no more players playing who were even born when the Aussie Open was a comparatively lesser event. It's got history.
Wouldn't have been a hard court double then thoughNot saying it's meaningless, just that many top players then could have archieved this but couldn't.
A lot of it is due to where the Australian Open was in the calendar. See below. When the Australian Open was in a death slot over the Christmas period, the tournament's reputation was at its lowest. When it moved to a late November to mid December slot, things started improving. Things improved more with the new venue and the January slot.Connors went twice, won it once, and made the final the second Through the first half of the 70s given most of the top players were Australian it was pretty well attended. It was only really 5/6 years where it was truly a nothing tournament (prestige wise, it obviously still had less prize money and fewer rankings points even after guys started going).
But yes, I take your point. It was a long way to travel at an awkward time of year for less reward, and not winning it then doesn't mean much to a legacy.
Still, we've got over 30 years now of it being top-level, so to point stuff like this out is not exactly meaningless. We've almost reached a point where there are no more players playing who were even born when the Aussie Open was a comparatively lesser event. It's got history.
For clarity, Wilander in 1988 won the Australian Open (128 man draw, best of 5 sets every round), Key Biscayne (128 man draw, best of 5 sets every round) and US Open (128 man draw, best of 5 sets every round).Wilander in '88 was also the hardcourt 128 draw best of five triple...
Can't be done again
I've heard historians say they think HC was Laver's best surface.
are you saying "historians" sarcastically or are there legit historians who say this? my guess was that (to the extent they were meaningfully separable) his condition preferences went something like indoors >= grass >= outdoor hard > clayI ignored those guys because the USO was grass in their era as well
from what i could tell Smith strongly preferred indoor to outdoor hard, so idk about naming him along with the other 2 in terms of hard court slam double contentionSame for (in the Open Era) the likes of Laver, Newcombe, and Smith.
Laver's best surface was grass, from the games i've seen of him that's what i can say.I've heard historians say they think HC was Laver's best surface. I ignored those guys because the USO was grass in their era as well, but if both majors had been HC I think the list would be quite a bit longer.
From what I've heard the grass courts at the AO and USO played differently to Wimbledon and were of generally poorer quality. No way they could make the HC play exactly like grass though.
He can, and I now thoroughly believe he will!Wilander in 88
Federer in 04, 06, 07
Djokovic in 11, 15, 23
Even rarer is AO, USO, YEC triple
Federer in 04, 06, 07
Djokovic in 11, 15, 23
Can Sinner join this very elite group?
Delpo on roidsI love watching Sinner crushing those groundstrokes. The sound the ball makes when he hits it just stands out....kind of like how I never got tired of seeing Del Potro hit those forehands.
For clarity, Wilander in 1988 won the Australian Open (128 man draw, best of 5 sets every round), Key Biscayne (128 man draw, best of 5 sets every round) and US Open (128 man draw, best of 5 sets every round).
Wilander in 88
Federer in 04, 06, 07
Djokovic in 11, 15, 23
Even rarer is AO, USO, YEC triple
Federer in 04, 06, 07
Djokovic in 11, 15, 23
Can Sinner join this very elite group?
If anything comes close then those 87-89 Miami editions. If we include AO from the 70s (and some of the 80s) then a good argument can be made actually.The arguable "5th" major.
Sampras in 1994 would have been a big favourite. He would also then have done the triple with YEC.He prevented Agassi from doing the double in 1995 and maybe 2001, though Hewitt may have beaten him in 2001. I do think Agassi beats Courier in 1995 in the absence of PETE. Of course Sampras himself probably does this feat in 1995 without Agassi and possibly 1994 if he's not injured in the lead-up.
Exactly why I picked him as my next guy after Novak. For a lanky lad the movement is surprisingly great and for a skinny lad he crushes that FH!I love watching Sinner crushing those groundstrokes. The sound the ball makes when he hits it just stands out....kind of like how I never got tired of seeing Del Potro hit those forehands.
The 1997 was played on HC, but about the 1999 different sources say different things. I have read multiple times that it was on carpet. Do you happen to have any sources that confirm it was on hard?Had the AO become hard courts 10 years earlier, then Mr. Lendl likely pulls of the feat a couple of times. He once said that Rebound Ace is his favorite surface to play on.
That said, the YE tourney was played on carpet through 1996. It switched to hard courts in 1997. IIRC, the 2005 WTF was also played on carpet(a one-off at that time).
Muster (and Agassi) played in the same era against the same competition as Bruguera.Comparatively the Miami tournament was actually more competitive with deeper draws than the AO. This is why "slams only" people are to put kindly have a very narrow view. The French Open for example was infinitely harder to actually win for anyone during Borg and Nadal's prime period than outside of it.
How else can we compare guys like Bruegera and Kodes winning twice and guys like Federer, Agassi, Vilas, Muster winning once? Or Dominic Thiem winning 0 making 2 Finals and 2 Semis?
Who would you say had the higher peak? Pete pushed Agassi more at the AO than Agassi pushed Pete at the USO. But then again Pete at the USO is arguably better than Agassi at the AO.Pete was very good in 1994 IMO but Andre has the better record at the USO by comparison with the finals and consistency.
There are legit very knowledgeable posters in the Former section who have said this yes. I don't know if it's true, but I can see Laver's game working at it's best on HC.are you saying "historians" sarcastically or are there legit historians who say this? my guess was that (to the extent they were meaningfully separable) his condition preferences went something like indoors >= grass >= outdoor hard > clay
from what i could tell Smith strongly preferred indoor to outdoor hard, so idk about naming him along with the other 2 in terms of hard court slam double contention
He didn't get to play HC at his peak, but he amassed quite a record on it in his 30's. I think he would have done very very well if there were HC majors in the mid-60's.Laver's best surface was grass, from the games i've seen of him that's what i can say.
The early and earlier Open Era had a less stratified tour and the prestige of events sort of varied sometimes year to year. For example the WCT finals in Dallas gave out the biggest paychecks of the time and were certainly de-facto majors as well - I would consider both the 1971 and 1972 editions for Rosewall for example. In Borg's case the WCT final and Grand Prix Masters Finals he won were certainly bigger events than the AO in those years.If anything comes close then those 87-89 Miami editions. If we include AO from the 70s (and some of the 80s) then a good argument can be made actually.
I agree, it was his best year in terms of overall level of play IMO.Sampras in 1994 would have been a big favourite. He would also then have done the triple with YEC.
What was Agassi's best year at the USO? Relatively speaking I'd be very tempted to back 1994 Sampras at the AO over any USO Agassi.Who would you say had the higher peak? Pete pushed Agassi more at the AO than Agassi pushed Pete at the USO. But then again Pete at the USO is arguably better than Agassi at the AO.
Mmmkay and??Muster (and Agassi) played in the same era against the same competition as Bruguera.
Could subscribe to that one.What was Agassi's best year at the USO? Relatively speaking I'd be very tempted to back 1994 Sampras at the AO over any USO Agassi.
1999 or 1997?The 1997 was played on HC, but about the 1999 different sources say different things. I have read multiple times that it was on carpet. Do you happen to have any sources that confirm it was on hard?
@messiahrobins I can also remember you said you were there and it was carpet.
1999.1999 or 1997?
Carpet, last time was played on carpet1999.
1999.
Strange that 97 was on HC and 99 back on carpet.I remember it being on hard court.
Edit: Apparently, it was on carpet.
2005, I believe. Nalbandian beat Federer in the final.Carpet, last time was played on carpet
That was a one-off though. 97 was already on indoor HC and from 2000-2004 as well. Do you happen to know whether 1999 was on carpet or indoor HC? There are sources who say it was indoor HC. Wikipedia says carpet and so does Wasp in the match report. Also, @messiahrobins was there and says carpet so that is good enough for me. Just wondering why so many sources say indoor HC.2005, I believe. Nalbandian beat Federer in the final.
Nadal's win over Federer in the 2006 Dubai final was Federer's first hardcourt match loss since the 2005 Australian Open semi final against Safin.
I'm pretty sure 1999 was carpet. That's how I remember it from the time. Sampras beat Agassi badly in the final.That was a one-off though. 97 was already on indoor HC and from 2000-2004 as well. Do you happen to know whether 1999 was on carpet or indoor HC? There are sources who say it was indoor HC. Wikipedia says carpet and so does Wasp in the match report. Also, @messiahrobins was there and says carpet so that is good enough for me. Just wondering why so many sources say indoor HC.
I'm pretty sure 1999 was carpet. That's how I remember it from the time. Sampras beat Agassi badly in the final.
It seemed like peak Hewitt was losing to Federer every slam.@NatF you're a stats guy, when was the last time two players faced off in 3 of the 4 slams in a single season? Especially two top 5 players.
I just realized Med-Sinner played at AO, Wimbledon and USO this year. It's remarkable.
I think I remember perfectly the commentators on TV saying it was indoor hard at the time, but Wiki says carpet.That was a one-off though. 97 was already on indoor HC and from 2000-2004 as well. Do you happen to know whether 1999 was on carpet or indoor HC? There are sources who say it was indoor HC. Wikipedia says carpet and so does Wasp in the match report. Also, @messiahrobins was there and says carpet so that is good enough for me. Just wondering why so many sources say indoor HC.
Late 90s there was much talk about getting rid of carpet courts so what happened then was a move to call carpet courts hard courts to ease that transition so to speak.That was a one-off though. 97 was already on indoor HC and from 2000-2004 as well. Do you happen to know whether 1999 was on carpet or indoor HC? There are sources who say it was indoor HC. Wikipedia says carpet and so does Wasp in the match report. Also, @messiahrobins was there and says carpet so that is good enough for me. Just wondering why so many sources say indoor HC.
As I said there are various sources saying indoor hard. Also it clearly states everywhere that 97 was on indoor hard which would mean they would have done a switch back and forth. However, Wikipedia says 99 was on carpet and so do @Mustard and @messiahrobins . @Waspsting : your match reports says carpet as well. Do you happen to have some additional sources here?It was on indoor hard:
Pete Sampras VS Andre Agassi | Head 2 Head | H2H | ATP Tour | Tennis
Head to head records for players in men's professional tennis. View rivalry results and stats for matches on the ATP Tour.www.atptour.com
Go to Event breakdown. Exactly as I remember it.
Tsitsipas hasn't looked like a genuine threat to anyone since he broke through in 2019, and since then everyone has had him figured out.In '23, Djokovic defeated Tsitsipas at AO, and Medvedev (who beat him 2 years prior) at US.
My memory is that the 1997 YEC was indoor hardcourt (the first time the tournament wasn't carpet since 1974 on grass), but I thought 1998 and 1999 were indoor carpet again. 2000-2002 indoor hardcourt. 2003-2004 was outdoor hardcourt. 2005 was the last indoor carpet one, as I recall. Indoor hardcourt from 2006 onwards.As I said there are various sources saying indoor hard. Also it clearly states everywhere that 97 was on indoor hard which would mean they would have done a switch back and forth. However, Wikipedia says 99 was on carpet and so do @Mustard and @messiahrobins . @Waspsting : your match reports says carpet as well. Do you happen to have some additional sources here?
That is what I also remember.My memory is that the 1997 YEC was indoor hardcourt (the first time the tournament wasn't carpet since 1974 on grass), but I thought 1998 and 1999 were indoor carpet again. 2000-2002 indoor hardcourt. 2003-2004 was outdoor hardcourt. 2005 was the last indoor carpet one, as I recall. Indoor hardcourt from 2006 onwards.
In the first sentence it says “…auf Teppichbelag ausgetragen wurde” meaning carpet. It only later in the info table says “hard”.