open stance serve

dlam

Professional
Anyone have opinions why closed stance is better
pros and cons with an open stance serve ?
I dont think I seen open stance when serving in ATP tour, look like mostly closed stance when serving
 
You lose the rotational aspect when serving with a more open stance. It will be harder to get margin over the net (kick second serves), and you won’t get to use all angles. I think a pro example would be Rinderknech. His serve is still really good, but limited.
 
Anyone have opinions why closed stance is better
pros and cons with an open stance serve ?
I dont think I seen open stance when serving in ATP tour, look like mostly closed stance when serving
It’s only relevant if you use proper grip and proper “throwing” mechanics.

If you swat at the ball with FH/pancake grip, quite possible no need for “closed” stance.

What’s your case? Have you been coached to serve?
 
IMO it should be much more open than many think. You don’t have the flexibility and rotational power to have the stance as closed as Federer, Djokovic or Sampras’.
 
IMO it should be much more open than many think. You don’t have the flexibility and rotational power to have the stance as closed as Federer, Djokovic or Sampras’.
That's true, but I won't be going more open than Bublik or Rublev, anyway...
 
That's true, but I won't be going more open than Bublik or Rublev, anyway...
As a platform stance server I feel a square stance like Becker’s is good enough. Why does it have to be hugely closed like Federer’s or Sampras while almost every pinpoint stance ends up being either neutral or slightly open?


 
Anyone have opinions why closed stance is better
pros and cons with an open stance serve ?
I dont think I seen open stance when serving in ATP tour, look like mostly closed stance when serving
The throwing motion which is intrinsic to a good serve lends itself to a more closed stance versus an open stance.

I suppose you could possibly try to pattern a serve after an open stance similar to the way some pitchers pitch but presumably you'd still end up closing by rotation the upper body in order to execute an effective throwing motion. I think the more unwieldy racquet which is being "thrown" would hamper that kind of maneuver compared to something smaller like a baseball.

I've never thought to try and experiment with an open stance serve, but if you try it out please let us know about your experience.
 
You lose the rotational aspect when serving with a more open stance. It will be harder to get margin over the net (kick second serves), and you won’t get to use all angles. I think a pro example would be Rinderknech. His serve is still really good, but limited.
I Look at Rinderknech serve. I think it helps to be 6’6” he doesn’t require the margin that a shorter guy closer to 6 feet tall needs to kick spin the ball into the serve court
 
As a platform stance server I feel a square stance like Becker’s is good enough. Why does it have to be hugely closed like Federer’s or Sampras while almost every pinpoint stance ends up being either neutral or slightly open?


Different dynamics. Longer uncoil rather than forward momentum turned into cartwheel. Also with all that — going for more topspin component than pure sidespin. Need to remain sideways for shoulder-over-shoulder despite long uncoil…
 
It’s only relevant if you use proper grip and proper “throwing” mechanics.

If you swat at the ball with FH/pancake grip, quite possible no need for “closed” stance.

What’s your case? Have you been coached to serve?
Yes agreed. I think a reverse spin serve like the one Taylor Fritz does for fun from the ad side can be easier with open stance
 
Different dynamics. Longer uncoil rather than forward momentum turned into cartwheel. Also with all that — going for more topspin component than pure sidespin. Need to remain sideways for shoulder-over-shoulder despite long uncoil…
A square stance (Becker) is good enough for both, especially for a rec player.
 
As a platform stance server I feel a square stance like Becker’s is good enough. Why does it have to be hugely closed like Federer’s or Sampras while almost every pinpoint stance ends up being either neutral or slightly open?


Don’t see these type of serve and volleyers that land on their right foot and then rush to the net anymore Becker’s serve was great back then
 
Don’t see these type of serve and volleyers that land on their right foot and then rush to the net anymore Becker’s serve was great back then
Yeah, no idea about that weird right foot landing. The stance makes perfect sense to me though.
 
Well he’s pinpoint, no? And using Aussie grip. Yes, can work. But I prefer Sinner/Rublev style pinpoint now. Not too closed, for sure.
No, it’s platform. A narrowish one, which I also think is a great idea for a rec player.
 
The throwing motion which is intrinsic to a good serve lends itself to a more closed stance versus an open stance.

I suppose you could possibly try to pattern a serve after an open stance similar to the way some pitchers pitch but presumably you'd still end up closing by rotation the upper body in order to execute an effective throwing motion. I think the more unwieldy racquet which is being "thrown" would hamper that kind of maneuver compared to something smaller like a baseball.

I've never thought to try and experiment with an open stance serve, but if you try it out please let us know about your experience.
Yes I agree. Throwers naturally start with closed shoulders I was looking to see if anyone had a truely open stance that was any good and all I could come up with was Goran Ivanisevic
So I tried that style but I think biomechanics it’s not as consistent as starting off closed
 
When learning and developing your serve ... (right handed deuce side) ... your elbow will be coming over your hitting shoulder NOT towards your target (deuce service box) ... but towards the right net post ... which will require your shoulders to stay more closed.

~ MG
 
Here Goran's serve video
He is open stance most of the time, some might argue is more neutral stance but he is definitely not closed stance to begin with
the serve motion
His pinpoint is a bit unique in that both feet are more "open pinpoint" style then the more common neutral pinpoint style now a days
What I cannot get is how it is possible to serve with feet so open like this to begin with
From what I can observe in the video , Goran start his serving motion very low with bent knees and bending extreme forward at the waist
Most other players are standing taller when starting the serve motion

He has a Great serve that worked for him is the important thing
For most player who have an open stance the shoulder would be open too but I think Goran makes adjustments
by bending down really low and he preturns his shoulder so his chest is closed/neutral with open foot stance
I think that why we dont see that type of open stance serve as much , it require some bending and twisting of the head and upper torso at the start of the serve to be effective
Most players with pinpoints end up with feet together in more neutral position at trophy position
So I think it more natural with slightly closed stance to begin with as then it more biomechanical sound to turn and open the upper torso when getting to trophy position

Any comments?
Ps
Another unique aspect of Goran serve is extreme low ball toss.
I believe that because his motion was very simple leap up and serve without much turning of the torso his toss is shorten to account for his quick rhythm
looks like he was tossing the ball so as to serve before ball reached the apex
Don’t see that extreme low toss in today’s game

 
Last edited:
Here Goran's serve video
He is open stance most of the time, some might argue is more neutral stance but he is definitely not closed stance to begin with
the serve motion
His pinpoint is a bit unique in that both feet are more "open pinpoint" style then the more common neutral pinpoint style now a days
What I cannot get is how it is possible to serve with feet so open like this to begin with
From what I can observe in the video , Goran start his serving motion very low with bent knees and bending extreme forward at the waist
Most other players are standing taller when starting the serve motion

He has a Great serve that worked for him is the important thing
For most player who have an open stance the shoulder would be open too but I think Goran makes adjustments
by bending down really low and he preturns his shoulder so his chest is closed/neutral with open foot stance
I think that why we dont see that type of open stance serve as much , it require some bending and twisting of the head and upper torso at the start of the serve to be effective
Most players with pinpoints end up with feet together in more neutral position at trophy position
So I think it more natural with slightly closed stance to begin with as then it more biomechanical sound to turn and open the upper torso when getting to trophy position

Any comments?
Ps
Another unique aspect of Goran serve is extreme low ball toss.
I believe that because his motion was very simple leap up and serve without much turning of the torso his toss is shorten to account for his quick rhythm
looks like he was tossing the ball so as to serve before ball reached the apex
Don’t see that extreme low toss in today’s game

How is this “open”? What are you looking at? He’s showing his back to the opponent, his hips are 90 degree to the baseline. Feet are pinpoint and least significant for this discussion:

6f876901443502e82c6935fb4d14e22d.jpg
 
How is this “open”? What are you looking at? He’s showing his back to the opponent, his hips are 90 degree to the baseline. Feet are pinpoint and least significant for this discussion:

6f876901443502e82c6935fb4d14e22d.jpg
photo is at trophy position. Everyone looks almost identical more or less neutral at trophy.
My discussion is how he starts his serve motion
At the start of the serve his feet and stance are wide open then he brings feet to pinpoint
His toes are knees look like are pointed to the net
What’s your ideal pinpoint feet position ?
 
Last edited:
us-open-tennis-championship.webp



this photo is at a better angle to see how his feet and hips are positioned open
From the side can’t tell how open or closed the hips/knees and feet
look from front/ posterior view
 
Last edited:
us-open-tennis-championship.webp



this photo is at a better angle to see how his feet and hips are positioned open
From the side can’t tell how open or closed the hips/knees and feet
look from front/ posterior view
I agree he's open with his prep and his feet. Yet he compensates a lot with trunk twist, and gets shoulders oriented same sideways as most other players. That's not what's easy to copy for rec player, in my opimion.
 
I agree he's open with his prep and his feet. Yet he compensates a lot with trunk twist, and gets shoulders oriented same sideways as most other players. That's not what's easy to copy for rec player, in my opimion.
Yes after one month of trying very open. Then trying very closed stance. There too much compensation of either twisting ( when very closed) or not turning enough of my trunk( when open) The very best for me is to start off sideways square
 
us-open-tennis-championship.webp



this photo is at a better angle to see how his feet and hips are positioned open
From the side can’t tell how open or closed the hips/knees and feet
look from front/ posterior view
So after practicing this type of open stance The problem with open stance where Both toes are pointed at the net just before impact. Eventually it feels like upper trunk and arm does all the work with little contribution from hips and legs. Preturn to square the hips and legs seems to allow me to have more consistent serve
 
Best topic I’ve read today thanks to @dlam.

There’s all these talks about pronation from other threads and how important it is to serve. And now we have this talking about the importance of stance and trunk turn in serving.

I would love to hear from someone breaking down why stance and trunk turn is necessary when we put so much emphasis on pronation…

- is trunk turn and pronation independent of each other?

- if they’re connected what is more important? Trunk turn or pronation? Only reason I ask is that folks cannot stop talking about pronation.

- in the order of importance (if there is one) which is it? Trunk turn or pronation?

Stance matters only if trunk turn matters. If folks keep beating the dead horse in that pronation is what makes a serve great, then why do we need a proper stance for trunk turn? You can theorically hit a serve with pronation in open stances.

The debate is now open.
 
Best topic I’ve read today thanks to @dlam.

There’s all these talks about pronation from other threads and how important it is to serve. And now we have this talking about the importance of stance and trunk turn in serving.

I would love to hear from someone breaking down why stance and trunk turn is necessary when we put so much emphasis on pronation…

- is trunk turn and pronation independent of each other?

- if they’re connected what is more important? Trunk turn or pronation? Only reason I ask is that folks cannot stop talking about pronation.

- in the order of importance (if there is one) which is it? Trunk turn or pronation?

Stance matters only if trunk turn matters. If folks keep beating the dead horse in that pronation is what makes a serve great, then why do we need a proper stance for trunk turn? You can theorically hit a serve with pronation in open stances.

The debate is now open.
What we emphasize as core serving mechanics is not just “pronation”, it’s “throwing motion”. Which is based on loading shoulder into ESR stretch and then releasing into ISR (whole arm long axis rotation).

The loading happens when shoulder is accelerated up and around (the spine as axis), while arm and racquet drops back/lags passively, due to inertia.

Hence leg drive and trunk rotation is what exactly powers shoulder acceleration and provides shoulder “loading” via big muscle stretching. To be then released during upward swing.
 
Once upon a time, there was a poster called oserver who spammed TT with threads about his revolutionary open stance serve (which was actually no better than a typical 3.5 player's serve) until he got banned.
 
I have an open stance serve and Im really not happy with it as my body does not move forward enough.

So Im going pinpoint, which is a relatively easy transition.
 
Back
Top