Organised fans - provocateurs

daphne

Hall of Fame
Google translation



In the midst of winning the 20th Grand Slam of Novak Djokovic, many tennis experts realized that the first tennis player in the world would be hard to beat by any player, even the two biggest rivals. The same is claimed by the man who has been standing by him for years!

Obradović followed Novak's campaign for the sixth Wimbledon trophy from sunny Shanghai, where he trains some new tennis hopes, which he says he recognises in them the talent that the world's first racket had in his younger days.

Since he mentioned how some children remind him of Novak, Obradović remembered the younger days of the best in the world when he predicted his rule in white sports.
"There is also a crown witness. I did an interview when Novak was 13. I was at the US Open with Zimonjic who was playing doubles at the time. I gave an interview about Serbian tennis and Nenad, and then at the end of the interview I said we had a kid. in Belgrade, whose name is Novak Djokovic, and in a few years he will win the US Open, "Obradovic predicted, and Djokovic fulfilled in 2011.

"I knew from the coaching experienced eye that he has the potential to be number one. At that moment, Zimonjic was playing with Sampras, Roddick. So I said the same to Sampras, who asked me: 'Really?'. And then from year to year. when he met me at a tournament he asked what was going on with Novak, he remembered that story. They appreciated my opinion, I told everyone a kid is coming and he will be number one. It was nice to everyone, but they took me seriously, "the coach explained. .

"I put him to a lot of rehearsals, and everything that could break him and take him away from tennis made him even stronger. He just has those qualities, roughly speaking, those materials. Body, mind, emotion control, infinite feeling for the ball and chess way playing and approaching a conversation with a coach. Novak is a good student, he has a grade of 5 in physics, but also in mathematics. When you combine these two, you know that someone is motorically capable and very smart, "explained the tennis expert.

After Wimbledon, Novak Djokovic equalled the number of Grand Slam titles with Nadal and Federer. After surpassing Roger in the number of weeks spent at the top of the ATP list and now stepping into the 329th week (Federer 310), the Serbian ace with all his might wanted to equalise in the cups from the big competitions.

"The difference between Roger and Novak is reflected in one thing. Federer has a Barbie look. He is always perfect, he plays perfectly, so people comment on his elegance, he plays nicely. When he is on the field, he looks like a ballet. But is that a ballet dancer?" enjoys his ballet or does he create it to please others? That’s the big difference between him and Novak. Federer spends a tremendous amount of energy thinking and talking to please others.Novak is fidgety, he can say what he wants and then that the whole world collapsed on him because he helped the Italians, the Japanese, or he said goodbye to the Croats when they played the World Cup, "the former coach said openly.

The season opened brilliantly for the world number one, with a cup in Australia. This was followed by marathon matches at Roland Garros, a new trophy, and Wimbledon, which raised Novak's self-confidence to the maximum. Obradović explained how Djoković came to all these feats.

"No one in the world can claim whether even Novak will win. Anything can happen, nothing can be predicted. However, what stands out are the results that were made years ago. When measured with In Australia, we all know how many years Novak won there, so why couldn't he do it again, "said the coach.

"On the other hand, 127 players have the same chance to do the same as Novak. It needs to be done, there is a rock at the foot of the mountain again and it needs to be climbed to the top. If you get to the half and he pulls you back then it will be painful. There is an ambience in his head called Sisyphus' work. What Novak does even when he loses matches sets him apart from others. He has the qualities of a great champion. and that the next tournament pushes the stone uphill again. He processes the experience and next time climbs the stone to the top ", the expert presented pictorially.

"This whole machine called body and mind requires a huge amount of energy. Novak knows how to collect that energy, he has developed training to perfection. If the amount of energy is calculated in watts, Novak spends about 2,000 to prepare for Roland Garros. Rafa spends one 5, and he's been tired of it for years.It happened this year, that his big spending to prepare for Roland Garros separates him from Novak. Novak is like in the movies, a jumping ball that has the best energy possible in space, so it will be the best of all time, better than both Federer and Rafa ", Obradović is sure.

Criticism of the Western media began after the Serbian ace began to lower his success. Although many believe that ugly words give Novak fuel, Obradović claims that Đoković has no room for spite and that the word does not exist.

"Novak works on the energy balance of love. He is a huge hedonist, like his father Srdjan and he has that weight of love. He gives it and then it comes back to him. There Novak has a problem, when love doesn't come back to him, it hurts him. to learn the techniques by which he will defend himself that when he gives love, and he gets something bad, that it is an integral part of the cosmos. He should let it go like gases in space when they let stones fly, "Obradović advised.

"Novak is not exalted by the fact that they criticize him. People misunderstand that. We don't have it in us, it's nonsense when they say that we do something out of spite. Novak doesn't have a shred of spite in himself, nor do Serbs have it. It's not spite. If it is love out of love, if Novak organizes a tournament, invites top players, he does it out of love for tennis, his country and the city. And when someone tells you, like Kirjos, that something wasn't good, Novak, when he makes a result, doesn't make it out of spite, but because he likes to play, he doesn't have their fuel of hatred, so he does something to them out of spite. "There is no stubbornness, no psychologist, nor will science be able to explain this grave nonsense," the tennis expert pointed out.

Although he has already hinted that there is no more complete player than Novak, he does not support a sharp discussion about the race for the greatest of all time.

However, when it could be measured - he believes that Djokovic is the proud owner of that title.

"The western media also call me, they ask me in China. Who exactly defined GOAT (the greatest of all time), what are the parameters? When you talk about the best, it means that you are talking about an element called magnesium. It has the correct structure as an element. Chemistry is an exact science, has anyone put exactly what is exactly needed to be the best of all time? When it is put, then the parameters made by Novak are set, so he is probably well ahead of everyone. in six years… ", there is no doubt Obradović.

Recently, a Rolex commercial appeared in which the main character Roger Federer is praised for his beauty and in which it is noted that numbers do not matter. That happened just before Novak won the equalizing Grand Slam.

"But what do we see now? The Western media and Federer inserting a new element. They like Roger the most, you have a figure skating phenomenon called artistic impression. So we now measure what Federer said 'I'm prettier.' that's 'degute' ", Obradović is dissatisfied.

The tennis expert also commented on the audience, which is often not on Novak's side. Obradović revealed that these are all the same people who loudly resent the moves of the best tennis player in the world from the stands.

"They are always the same characters in tournaments who name Novak. They were put there on purpose, and before the match they drank a lot of beer to do their job easier. Novak knows all those characters after every tournament. They change them sometimes, but they are all the same provocateurs. Very interesting, they rarely provoke Rafa, and never Roger. But, Novak regularly! I saw those characters, I know them, we are struggling with those years, but Novak has no problem with that, "the former coach revealed.

This year, Novak could become the first tennis player who managed to win all the Grand Slams together with the Olympic Games in one season. There are still "only" the US Open and Tokyo. The problem for Djokovic is the absence of the audience, which is why the first racket in the world is still considering whether to represent Serbia. Obradovic believes that Nole will make the right decision.

"Novak has won three Grand Slams since the beginning of the year, he now has self-confidence greater than the Sun that shines on us. He will consult with who needs it, but I think he will make that decision himself. I would like him to play the Olympics because they have a similar amount of energy as the old Davis Cup. Novak loves that energy when he is there with other Serbian athletes. He then shines like Tesla's light bulb ", concluded Bogdan Obradović.

 
What an idiot this guy is. His comment on Federer's style is too ridiculous for words.

That's what the Serbs think of Fedr's style. Srdjan's influence is just too much.

We know this guy very well, he's a media ***** so you can disregard whatever he said. Actually you'd be surprised how many people cheer for Federer in Serbia. Personally I resent Federer's attitude towards Novak from the early years and now famous "he is not a threat to me and has no weapons which can hurt me" which was said in 2006 all the way to the perpetual in 2021. Srdjan has nothing to do with that I guess.
 
We know this guy very well, he's a media ***** so you can disregard whatever he said. Actually you'd be surprised how many people cheer for Federer in Serbia. Personally I resent Federer's attitude towards Novak from the early years and now famous "he is not a threat to me and has no weapons which can hurt me" which was said in 2006 all the way to the perpetual in 2021. Srdjan has nothing to do with that I guess.
Mate, I was pulling this guy's leg :)
 
"Novak is not exalted by the fact that they criticize him. People misunderstand that. We don't have it in us, it's nonsense when they say that we do something out of spite. Novak doesn't have a shred of spite in himself, nor do Serbs have it. It's not spite. If it is love out of love, if Novak organizes a tournament, invites top players, he does it out of love for tennis, his country and the city. And when someone tells you, like Kirjos, that something wasn't good, Novak, when he makes a result, doesn't make it out of spite, but because he likes to play, he doesn't have their fuel of hatred, so he does something to them out of spite. "There is no stubbornness, no psychologist, nor will science be able to explain this grave nonsense," the tennis expert pointed out.

I thought you said that Novak Djokovic was driven by hatred of the West and what they'd done to his country?

:unsure:
 
If there ever was person in Serbian tennis that I would roll my eyes backwards, it's Obradovic. You can't find such ppl anymore.
 
This is all just making excuses for Novak Djokovic's behaviour and attitude btw. If you're a jerk, it doesn't matter what your nationality is lol. You're still a jerk.
 




Good to start understanding the psyche and inat.
How about this?

It has been said that the closest translation of Inat (pronounced EE-nat) is the phrase ‘cutting off your nose to spite your face’, but even that falls short. In simple terms, Inat is doing something in spite of the consequences, the somewhat reckless desire to touch something purely because it comes with a sticker saying ‘Do Not Touch’, the immediate compelling feeling to do something because it is forbidden.
 
How about this?

It has been said that the closest translation of Inat (pronounced EE-nat) is the phrase ‘cutting off your nose to spite your face’, but even that falls short. In simple terms, Inat is doing something in spite of the consequences, the somewhat reckless desire to touch something purely because it comes with a sticker saying ‘Do Not Touch’, the immediate compelling feeling to do something because it is forbidden.
If we had to narrow it down for the sake of a debate than it's a starting point. However, if one would want to go deeper into understanding why someone like Djokovic acts as he does then it requires a more thorough explanation.
 
Good grief, this guy takes paranoia to a new level. Paid provocateurs?

Maybe if all Novak's family, team, and supporters would stop telling us how we ought to like him in the manner of parents telling their toddlers how much they ought to like broccoli better than chocolate we'd all actually like him a great deal better.
 
If we had to narrow it down for the sake of a debate than it's a starting point. However, if one would want to go deeper into understanding why someone like Djokovic act as he does then it requires a more thorough explanation.
Debate? Why would I want to do that? I was just trying to get a grasp of a word that is foreign to me. Each country has indefinable national characteristics, and the only way to fully understand that is to live in that country, or be really close friends with someone from another country.
 
Debate? Why would I want to do that? I was just trying to get a grasp of a word that is foreign to me. Each country has indefinable national characteristics, and the only way to fully understand that is to live in that country, or be really close friends with someone from another country.
I did not mean you wanted a debate but if there were one that would be a good starting point.
 
I did not mean you wanted a debate but if there were one that would be a good starting point.
Fair: I think it's safe to say that it's easy to talk about a country or the people who live there and be terribly wrong, and I think also that there is such diversity that it's also easy to over generalize. For instance, if you by into certain assumptions about the US, many of which might be somewhat accurate in general, they would not fit me much at all.

That doesn't mean that they don't exist, overall. For the record there are many things I have always admired about Novak. One is his sense of humor. Another is his respect for his opponents, the way he always gives them credit whether he wins or loses. A third is his mastery of languages. For instance, I think he speaks English very well and to me he seems to speak it better than many people here, who absolutely mangle English.
 
The more I think about this the more utterly bizaare it seems.

Who do they think is paying these provocateurs? Federer? He's spent fifteen years polishing his halo and protecting his trillion dollar PR image but of course he's going to risk all that by paying some yobs to whistle at Novak.
 
What an idiot this guy is. His comment on Federer's style is too ridiculous for words.
And in a post as long as War and Peace, the only thing the OP did was bold the Roger part. The enmity and hatred oozes from every single pore. Never fails!

tumblr_m9h1cwNRV31qfzaz9o1_r1_500.gif
 
Back
Top