Paris Masters 2025: Court will be slowed down.

Rattie

G.O.A.T.

According to the article:

“The surface of the Paris Masters 1000 will be slightly slowed down in order to get closer to the playing conditions of the ATP Finals in Turin, played a week later.”

Over the last 4 years, only in 2024 did Paris record faster playing conditions than Turin (45.5 vs 39.4 CPI, via courtspeed.com).

In fact, the 2024 Paris Masters reached 45.5 CPI, making it the fastest conditions on tour in more than 4 years.

Based on this article (interview with tournament director), I assume that this year’s court speed in Paris should be around 40+ CPI — still on the faster side, just not as lightning quick as last year.”


I guess Zverev will have something to say….
 
this isn't anything new. Bercy tournament organizers have been tinkering with tournament conditions and surfaces for 20 years. They famously wanted to get Fed to play the tournament (after 2003) and got rid of the carpet and put in a hardcourt to his team's nearly exact specifications in 2009 and 2010. Slowing the HCs at the Paris Masters isn't gonna be the end of the tennis world
 
They famously wanted to get Fed to play the tournament (after 2003) and got rid of the carpet and put in a hardcourt to his team's nearly exact specifications in 2009 and 2010.

Ballerina ended carpet.

But this couldn't avoid that he ended for 2 same era players as a fluffy doormat.

He should have advocated for carpet as a slam surface - because there were no Becker, Sampras ... around anymore.
 
Zverev's groundstrokes are slow no matter how fast the court is :rolleyes: whereas Alcaraz/Sinner's groundstrokes are faster than anything Zverev is capable of :cool: so the slower surfaces help Zverev stay in the rallies...but actually Zverev isn't even good enough to make it that far, as he's only played Alcaraz/Sinner ONCE each this year (AO and Cincy, and Zverev didn't win a set).
 
Last edited:
He should have advocated for carpet as a slam surface - because there were no Becker, Sampras ... around anymore.
It was for injury reasons. And to think that peak Federer would have feared Becker and Sampras is ridiculous. Remember Federer won the WTF undefeated 4 times. Becker and Sampras combined a big fat ZERO.
 
Zverev's gameplan on every surface is to push and wait for his opponent to make an unforced error.
Slow hardcourt gives Zverev his best chance of beating an elite player, with more time to retrieve and extend the rally.
If the court is faster, Alcaraz/Sinner would hit through him too easily, thereby ruining Z's mind-numbing artistry.
 
No matter how fast the court is, if they use tennis balls that are as fluffy as Angora Rabbits, everything is played like in a slo mo.

AVvXsEiz2EMoU4U0bWpBP4KiV2JOec8NnsRKYHcxbBikmfRW9TomuDJWXX6NdDAEte5Jxqo-c5tlkEqSZM52vRXS8TfqArWq7aHMKhMEgitSt_p6RqZGOa1WCJPhXNKu08RPQbutwtjr2fhQ4E7y


Screenshot%202025-10-25%20150659.png
 
Ballerina ended carpet.

But this couldn't avoid that he ended for 2 same era players as a fluffy doormat.

He should have advocated for carpet as a slam surface - because there were no Becker, Sampras ... around anymore.
this isn't anything new. Bercy tournament organizers have been tinkering with tournament conditions and surfaces for 20 years. They famously wanted to get Fed to play the tournament (after 2003) and got rid of the carpet and put in a hardcourt to his team's nearly exact specifications in 2009 and 2010. Slowing the HCs at the Paris Masters isn't gonna be the end of the tennis world
He skipped Paris in 2004 and 2005 because of injury and on 2006 because he prioritised Basel
 
I believe that Cinci was a clay court tournament, when it first began.
Yup was a clay court event until 1979--first on red brick and then on Har-Tru clay
He skipped Paris in 2004 and 2005 because of injury and on 2006 because he prioritised Basel
Which I totally understand, as Basel is his home tournament (and Bercy for me is one of the least prestigious M 1000s). But the tournament organizers still got rid of the carpet and installed a hardcourt to Fed's recommendations in order for him to eventually come there and eventually win (in a wonderful match vs Tsonga) in 2011. They've admitted to this in a L'Eqiupe magazine article a few years back
 
Paris used to be quite a bit slower back in the day. During the 10's it was like sandpaper. I felt like it got sped up near the end of that decade.
 
The saddest thing about this is that neither Sinner nor Alcaraz needed the courts to slow down for them to win.

That was the magic of the 1990s; in this sport, the winners were those who adapted to the conditions
Yeah I agree. I dont think they need them slowed down.
But I do think they both know they’re the few that can easily hit through slower conditions better than others.
 
... (and Bercy for me is one of the least prestigious M 1000s). But the tournament organizers still got rid of the carpet and installed a hardcourt to Fed's recommendations in order for him to eventually come there and eventually win (in a wonderful match vs Tsonga) in 2011. They've admitted to this in a L'Eqiupe magazine article a few years back
True. And the Paris Masters organizers adjusted the speed of a hardourt several times (during several years) to make it suitable to Fed.

¤¤ Jean-François Caujolle, former Paris Tournament Director shared some interesting words with L'Equipe (3 Nov 2018, translated from French):
"It was the year 2007 and since 2003 Federer hand't played the tournament. Then we put in contact with his team and asked them why he wasn't coming. It turned out that he didn't like the surface we had then at all (carpet) and advised us to contact an Austrian company which designed a type of resin similar to that of Vienna. We did and fulfilled his wishes. We got in contact in with the company and changed the surface. When he came to Paris he noticed that there wasn't much of a difference among surfaces in the circuit and told us that it felt like the ones in Indian Wells and Miami, where he had lost twice against Guillermo Cañas"

"I started looking for materials to give a lower bounce and turn the game faster. In 2010 we managed to build the fastest court in the world. That one clearly suited a lot better Federer's game than Nadal's [smiles]. The curious thing was that that year players like Ljubicic and Isner lost in the first round. The court didn't seem to favour the big servers but the best volleyers. Finally, in 2011 Federer was able to win the tournament. Since then, the court has been slowed down a bit but I'd still say it's the fastest one in the Masters circuit." ¤¤

 
True. And the Paris Masters organizers adjusted the speed of a hardourt several times (during several years) to make it suitable to Fed.

¤¤ Jean-François Caujolle, former Paris Tournament Director shared some interesting words with L'Equipe (3 Nov 2018, translated from French):
"It was the year 2007 and since 2003 Federer hand't played the tournament. Then we put in contact with his team and asked them why he wasn't coming. It turned out that he didn't like the surface we had then at all (carpet) and advised us to contact an Austrian company which designed a type of resin similar to that of Vienna. We did and fulfilled his wishes. We got in contact in with the company and changed the surface. When he came to Paris he noticed that there wasn't much of a difference among surfaces in the circuit and told us that it felt like the ones in Indian Wells and Miami, where he had lost twice against Guillermo Cañas"

"I started looking for materials to give a lower bounce and turn the game faster. In 2010 we managed to build the fastest court in the world. That one clearly suited a lot better Federer's game than Nadal's [smiles]. The curious thing was that that year players like Ljubicic and Isner lost in the first round. The court didn't seem to favour the big servers but the best volleyers. Finally, in 2011 Federer was able to win the tournament. Since then, the court has been slowed down a bit but I'd still say it's the fastest one in the Masters circuit." ¤¤

Ah well , poor Fed only got an M1000 .

Nadal would have never won two wimbledons if they hadn't shamelessly slowed down the grass to hardcourt level.
 
Ah well , poor Fed only got an M1000 .

Nadal would have never won two wimbledons if they hadn't shamelessly slowed down the grass to hardcourt level.
They slowed down Wimbledon since 2001, before your idol's dominance there began.
Leave opinions aside, the fact is that they made the change to make the game more homogeneous for everyone but the difference will always lie in the players with the greatest skills to impose their game on their opponents on the court.
:notworthy:
 
They slowed down Wimbledon since 2001, before your idol's dominance there began.
Leave opinions aside, the fact is that they made the change to make the game more homogeneous for everyone but the difference will always lie in the players with the greatest skills to impose their game on their opponents on the court.
:notworthy:
Who do you think would have benefited more if they hadn't ?
 

According to the article:

“The surface of the Paris Masters 1000 will be slightly slowed down in order to get closer to the playing conditions of the ATP Finals in Turin, played a week later.”

Over the last 4 years, only in 2024 did Paris record faster playing conditions than Turin (45.5 vs 39.4 CPI, via courtspeed.com).

In fact, the 2024 Paris Masters reached 45.5 CPI, making it the fastest conditions on tour in more than 4 years.

Based on this article (interview with tournament director), I assume that this year’s court speed in Paris should be around 40+ CPI — still on the faster side, just not as lightning quick as last year.”


I guess Zverev will have something to say….

that court is nowhere 40 cpi its more like 35/36 for what i see and what players have said. The court is really slooowwww, perfect for Alcaraz athleticism
 
why are green courts making a comeback?...I forget if this has been here in Paris (think it has) but I'm starting to see them on both tours a little more...thought we had agreed blue was better for viewing, but maybe now HD means we can see fine with green?...I guess indoors is better than outside in the sun at least
 
why are green courts making a comeback?...I forget if this has been here in Paris (think it has) but I'm starting to see them on both tours a little more...thought we had agreed blue was better for viewing, but maybe now HD means we can see fine with green?...I guess indoors is better than outside in the sun at least

Yeah Bercy was green, too.
 
why are green courts making a comeback?...I forget if this has been here in Paris (think it has) but I'm starting to see them on both tours a little more...thought we had agreed blue was better for viewing, but maybe now HD means we can see fine with green?...I guess indoors is better than outside in the sun at least
Rolex brand color is dark green.
 
Who do you think would have benefited more if they hadn't ?
You're talking about something that's been debated a lot of times.
Believe what you want, there are still differences between surfaces even if they are more homogeneous than in the past.
:notworthy:
 
Back
Top