It is relevant to peak level of play where it matters the most, slam finals.
14-4 in slam finals, wow impressive that Pete.
17-8 in slam finals, wow amazing that Roger.
14-6 in slam finals, good, no?
11-5 in slam finals, Borg was a beast.
Peak Federer is overrated, never had a dominant h2h against Nadal at his best seasons unlike Djokovic who dominated Rafa 6-0 and Federer 4-1 in 2011. How some can say that peak Federer is better than peak Djokovic is just ridiculous.
Federer's h2h against Nadal:
2004: 0-1
2005: 1-1
2006: 2-4
2007: 3-2
The stat that truly counts from that same period (slams)...
2004 : 3-0
2005 : 2-1
2006 : 3-1
2007 : 3-1
(11-3)
Delete thread.
Ban OP.
Peak Federer is overrated, never had a dominant h2h against Nadal at his best seasons unlike Djokovic who dominated Rafa 6-0 and Federer 4-1 in 2011. How some can say that peak Federer is better than peak Djokovic is just ridiculous.
Because Djokovic has been beating up late 20s Nadal, Federer had to deal with young fresh Nadal who didn't take off half the season. Stop overrating Djokovic, he isn't that good.
Another stupid thread by a fat little girl.
Djokovic's record in slam finals in his prime age exposes him. ******* 7 years past his prime with no forehand with his serve alone took him to 5 at Wimbledon.