Their grand slam winning percentages plus against non big 4 are very even. IIRC without the exact numbers: Raonic > Roddick > Nishikori > Hewitt.
Believe Roddick & Hewitt are 4-1 combined vs Nishikori & Raonic.Roddick/Hewitt are better and greater than Nishikori/Raonic. It's not even close.
Raonic beat Fed in a slam, unlike Hewitt or Roddick IIRCTheir grand slam winning percentages plus against non big 4 are very even. IIRC without the exact numbers: Raonic > Roddick > Nishikori > Hewitt.
Hypocrite propaganda or just propaganda?Typical gaslighting & propaganda.
Roddick and Hewitt by some margin, it's Potro you should compare them to.
The Sinner type of propaganda where we pretend we are seeing something better than we actually are.Hypocrite propaganda or just propaganda?
And Nishikori also beat a very good version of Djokovic at the USO..Raonic beat Fed in a slam, unlike Hewitt or Roddick IIRC
Millman beat Fed in a slam and almost did it again! Millman has the third highest peak of the modern era.Raonic beat Fed in a slam, unlike Hewitt or Roddick IIRC
The Sinner shall save tennis.The Sinner type of propaganda where we pretend we are seeing something better than we actually are.
Raonic beat Fed in a slam, unlike Hewitt or Roddick IIRC
Yes, one match against Fed decides this...And Nishikori also beat a very good version of Djokovic at the USO..
Don't be ridiculous, you don't need the third highest peak to beat Fed in a slam, unless you think that classless, talentless, PUSHER Djokovic has one of the highest peaks, lolMillman beat Fed in a slam and almost did it again! Millman has the third highest peak of the modern era.
Well one set (in a match he lost) decides that Roddick's mythical peak is one of the highest ever seen, so why not?Yes, one match against Fed decides this...
Modern era, i.e. the weakest era of all spacetime. Fred is ancient now.Don't be ridiculous, you don't need the third highest peak to beat Fed in a slam, unless you think that hypocrite, talentless, PUSHER Djokovic has one of the highest peaks, lol
yes, much weaker than the era of BlakeModern era, i.e. the weakest era of all spacetime. Fred is ancient now.
The Sinner shall save tennis.
Roddick is overall a more talented human than Fed imho. He's a world-class tennis talent, but also has natural charisma, is wicked smart, and very effortlessly funny. A great communicator as well. He's also very self-deprecating which makes him endearing. Fed by contrast is sort of a one trick pony, only a tennis talent, and pretty much everything else managed by the Queen.Wow. Roddick's stock has really dropped a lot in the last 10 years.
Consequently, so has Hewitt's.
Are we counting cripples now?Raonic beat Fed in a slam, unlike Hewitt or Roddick IIRC
Fed really has really overachieved eh?Roddick is overall a more talented human than Fed imho.
Nishikori also got Nole at the OpenAre we counting cripples now?
Andy got Djoker at HIS Open.Nishikori also got Nole at the Open
LOLRoddick is overall a more talented human than Fed imho. He's a world-class tennis talent, but also has natural charisma, is wicked smart, and very effortlessly funny. A great communicator as well. He's also very self-deprecating which makes him endearing. Fed by contrast is sort of a one trick pony, only a tennis talent, and pretty much everything else managed by the Queen.
Nole wasn't fully healthy in that match, nor was he in his prime yetAndy got Djoker at HIS Open.
Either was Fed at WC vs Raonic.Nole wasn't fully healthy in that match, nor was he in his prime yet
My claim actually has proof, i.e. he retired from the match for health related reasons. Federer was able to finish his match, and had peaked at the tournament the year prior in that very roundEither was Fed at WC vs Raonic.
Was a good match from Nishi but Djoker was in his 2012-2014 mug mode at the US Open. Worst match of the three he lost, in fact.Nishikori also got Nole at the Open
Fed was also in Mug Mode against Roddick at WC '09, and A-Rod couldn't get it done.Was a good match from Nishi but Djoker was in his 2012-2014 mug mode at the US Open. Worst match of the three he lost, in fact.
Ferrer beat healthy Nadal in slams? lolMy claim actually has proof, i.e. he retired from the match for health related reasons. Federer was able to finish his match, and had peaked at the tournament the year prior in that very round
Feds mug mode is like a thermal starbucks mug though.Fed was also in Mug Mode against Roddick at WC '09, and A-Rod couldn't get it done.
Was Nadal able to finish the match?Ferrer beat healthy Nadal in slams? lol
as Blake and Srichaphan can confirm. Did you interview them for this particular metaphor?Feds mug mode is like a thermal starbucks mug though.
Djokovic was healthy in that match. Roddick outlasted him in the heat. Deal with it.Nole wasn't fully healthy in that match, nor was he in his prime yet
Some players just dont have the heart.Djokovic was healthy in that match. Roddick outlasted him in the heat. Deal with it.
Novak retired, so unfortunately your post is unsubstantiated.Djokovic was healthy in that match. Roddick outlasted him in the heat. Deal with it.
If the Wimbledon 2009 final is your bar for "mug mode", then Djoker must have been CRAPOLA in his match. The kind of crap even a toilet wouldn't take.Fed was also in Mug Mode against Roddick at WC '09, and A-Rod couldn't get it done.
Fed played pretty well in Wim 09 final.Fed was also in Mug Mode against Roddick at WC '09, and A-Rod couldn't get it done.
Djokovic was also able, he just refused to.Was Nadal able to finish the match?
#21 is coming around the corner my friend, no amount of projection will change that.Fed played pretty well in Wim 09 final.
I felt bad for Roddick.
But I am also sorry that win of Fed burns you up so much, fed-hater.